• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

连续股神经阻滞在治疗全膝关节置换术后疼痛方面比连续收肌管阻滞更有效:一项随机、双盲、对照试验。

Continuous femoral nerve block is more effective than continuous adductor canal block for treating pain after total knee arthroplasty: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.

作者信息

Borys Michał, Domagała Michał, Wencław Krzysztof, Jarczyńska-Domagała Joanna, Czuczwar Mirosław

机构信息

Second Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Medical University of Lublin.

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Sep;98(39):e17358. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017358.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000017358
PMID:31574881
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6775428/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Previous studies comparing adductor canal block (ACB) with femoral nerve block (FNB) are inconclusive with regard to patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) induced by opioids. Moreover, some postoperative pain severity results differ between previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary aim of the current study was to compare total intravenous morphine consumption administered via PCA during the first postoperative day in continuous FNB and ACB groups after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Secondary aims included evaluation of postoperative pain via a visual analog scale, degree of knee extension, quadriceps muscle strength, and ability to sit, stand upright, and walk.

METHODS

The study was a RCT. Inclusion criteria were presence of gonarthrosis, age >18 and <75 years, and scheduled for TKA under single-shot spinal anesthesia.

RESULTS

A number of morphine uses was lower in the FNB group than in the ACB group (14, range 12-15 vs 20, range 18-22; P = .0001), and they perceived less severe pain at the 8th (P = .00003) and 24th hours. However, ACB was significantly superior with regard to most of the other parameters pertaining to mobility, including muscle strength at the 8th and 24th hours, degree of knee extension at the 8th hour, sitting at the 8th hour, standing upright at the 24th hour, and walking at the 24th and 48th hours.

DISCUSSION

FNB was associated with the perception of less severe pain after TKAs. However, ACB was associated with earlier mobility rehabilitation.

摘要

目的

以往比较股内侧肌管阻滞(ACB)与股神经阻滞(FNB)的研究在阿片类药物诱导的患者自控镇痛(PCA)方面尚无定论。此外,以往的随机对照试验(RCT)之间的一些术后疼痛严重程度结果有所不同。本研究的主要目的是比较全膝关节置换术(TKA)后连续FNB组和ACB组术后第一天通过PCA给予的静脉注射吗啡总量。次要目的包括通过视觉模拟量表评估术后疼痛、膝关节伸展程度、股四头肌力量以及坐、直立和行走的能力。

方法

本研究为RCT。纳入标准为存在膝关节病、年龄>18岁且<75岁,并计划在单次脊麻下进行TKA。

结果

FNB组的吗啡使用次数低于ACB组(14次,范围12 - 15次 vs 20次,范围18 - 22次;P = 0.0001),且在第8小时(P = 0.00003)和第24小时时,他们感觉到的疼痛较轻。然而,在与活动能力相关的大多数其他参数方面,ACB明显更优,包括第8小时和第24小时的肌肉力量、第8小时的膝关节伸展程度、第8小时的坐姿、第24小时的直立姿势以及第24小时和第48小时的行走能力。

讨论

FNB与TKA后较轻的疼痛感知相关。然而,ACB与更早的活动能力康复相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc41/6775428/09002bb36daf/medi-98-e17358-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc41/6775428/83b3dd640d2d/medi-98-e17358-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc41/6775428/09002bb36daf/medi-98-e17358-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc41/6775428/83b3dd640d2d/medi-98-e17358-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc41/6775428/09002bb36daf/medi-98-e17358-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Continuous femoral nerve block is more effective than continuous adductor canal block for treating pain after total knee arthroplasty: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.连续股神经阻滞在治疗全膝关节置换术后疼痛方面比连续收肌管阻滞更有效:一项随机、双盲、对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Sep;98(39):e17358. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017358.
2
Effects of multi-site infiltration analgesia on pain management and early rehabilitation compared with femoral nerve or adductor canal block for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.全膝关节置换术患者多部位浸润镇痛与股神经或收肌管阻滞相比对疼痛管理和早期康复的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
Int Orthop. 2017 Jan;41(1):75-83. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3278-0. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
3
Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind study.收肌管阻滞与股神经阻滞用于全膝关节置换术后镇痛的随机、双盲研究。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Nov-Dec;38(6):526-32. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000015.
4
Does Patient Perception Differ Following Adductor Canal Block and Femoral Nerve Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Simultaneous Bilateral Randomized Study.全膝关节置换术中内收肌管阻滞与股神经阻滞术后患者感知是否存在差异?一项双侧同步随机研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jun;32(6):1856-1861. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.025. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
5
A randomised controlled trial comparing adductor canal block and femoral nerve block for knee arthroplasty.一项比较收肌管阻滞与股神经阻滞用于膝关节置换术的随机对照试验。
Singapore Med J. 2019 Mar;60(3):145-149. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2018082. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
6
The Risk of Falls After Total Knee Arthroplasty with the Use of a Femoral Nerve Block Versus an Adductor Canal Block: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Study.全膝关节置换术后使用股神经阻滞与内收肌管阻滞的跌倒风险:一项双盲随机对照研究。
Anesth Analg. 2016 May;122(5):1696-703. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001237.
7
[Comparision for clinical efficiency of continuous adductor canal block and femoral nerve block in total knee arthroplasty].[全膝关节置换术中连续收肌管阻滞与股神经阻滞的临床疗效比较]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017 Feb 18;49(1):142-7.
8
Efficacy of Single-Shot Adductor Canal Block Combined With Posterior Capsular Infiltration on Postoperative Pain and Functional Outcome After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study.单次收肌管阻滞联合后囊浸润对全膝关节置换术后疼痛和功能结局的疗效:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Aug;34(8):1650-1655. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.076. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
9
Is Adductor Canal Block Better Than Femoral Nerve Block in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty? A GRADE Analysis of the Evidence Through a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.在初次全膝关节置换术中,收肌管阻滞比股神经阻滞更好吗?通过系统评价和荟萃分析对证据进行的GRADE分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Oct;32(10):3238-3248.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 May 17.
10
Comparison of Analgesic Effects of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block, Femoral Triangle Block, and Adductor Block After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial.全膝关节置换术后连续股神经阻滞、股三角阻滞和收肌管阻滞的镇痛效果比较:一项随机临床试验。
Clin J Pain. 2024 Jun 1;40(6):373-382. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001211.

引用本文的文献

1
Research trends and frontiers in rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: based on bibliometric and visualization analysis.全膝关节置换术后康复的研究趋势与前沿:基于文献计量学与可视化分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Dec 31;19(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05377-5.
2
Continuous Adductor Canal Block Compared to Epidural Anesthesia for Total Knee Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术中连续收肌管阻滞与硬膜外麻醉的比较。
J Pain Res. 2024 Nov 13;17:3729-3740. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S462079. eCollection 2024.
3
Different peripheral nerve blocks for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

本文引用的文献

1
Early rehabilitation after elective total knee arthroplasty.择期全膝关节置换术后的早期康复
Acta Biomed. 2017 Oct 18;88(4S):56-61. doi: 10.23750/abm.v88i4-S.5154.
2
Anesthesia for the patient undergoing total knee replacement: current status and future prospects.全膝关节置换患者的麻醉:现状与未来展望
Local Reg Anesth. 2017 Mar 8;10:1-7. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S101373. eCollection 2017.
3
Incidence and prevalence of total joint replacements due to osteoarthritis in the elderly: risk factors and factors associated with late life prevalence in the AGES-Reykjavik Study.
不同外周神经阻滞用于全膝关节置换术患者:一项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Sep;144(9):4179-4206. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05507-y. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
4
Continuous adductor canal block versus continuous femoral nerve block for postoperative pain in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.连续内收肌管阻滞与连续股神经阻滞用于膝关节置换术后疼痛的比较:随机对照试验的最新荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 1;19(8):e0306249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306249. eCollection 2024.
5
Continuous lumbar erector spinae plane block as an alternative to epidural analgesia in pain treatment in patients undergoing hip replacement surgery - a prospective pilot study.连续腰方肌平面阻滞作为髋关节置换术后疼痛治疗中硬膜外镇痛的替代方法 - 一项前瞻性初步研究。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2023;55(4):272-276. doi: 10.5114/ait.2023.132517.
6
Femoral nerve block using lower concentration ropivacaine preserves quadriceps strength while providing similar analgesic effects after knee arthroscopy.关节镜检查术后,使用较低浓度罗哌卡因行股神经阻滞可保留股四头肌肌力,同时提供相似的镇痛效果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Nov;31(11):4988-4995. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07549-y. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
7
Effect of Femoral Nerve Block with Different Concentrations of Chloroprocaine on Early Postoperative Rehabilitation Training After Total Knee Arthroplasty.不同浓度氯普鲁卡因股神经阻滞对全膝关节置换术后早期康复训练的影响。
Med Sci Monit. 2023 Aug 23;29:e939858. doi: 10.12659/MSM.939858.
8
Adductor Canal Blocks Are Not Associated With Improved Early Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty.内收肌管阻滞与全膝关节置换术患者术后早期疗效改善无关。
Ochsner J. 2023 Spring;23(1):9-15. doi: 10.31486/toj.22.0074.
9
Femoral nerve blockade versus local infiltration analgesia for primary knee arthroplasty. Randomised controlled trial.股神经阻滞与局部浸润镇痛用于初次全膝关节置换术的效果比较。随机对照试验。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2022;54(5):387-392. doi: 10.5114/ait.2022.123346.
10
Motor-Sparing Effect of Adductor Canal Block for Knee Analgesia: An Updated Review and a Subgroup Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Based on a Corrected Classification System.收肌管阻滞用于膝关节镇痛的运动保留效应:基于校正分类系统的随机对照试验的最新综述与亚组分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 10;11(2):210. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11020210.
老年人骨关节炎导致的全关节置换的发病率和患病率:AGES-雷克雅未克研究中的风险因素及与晚年患病率相关的因素
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jan 12;17:14. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-0864-7.
4
Prevalence of Total Hip and Knee Replacement in the United States.美国全髋关节和膝关节置换的患病率。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Sep 2;97(17):1386-97. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01141.
5
Patient controlled opioid analgesia versus non-patient controlled opioid analgesia for postoperative pain.患者自控阿片类镇痛与非患者自控阿片类镇痛用于术后疼痛的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 2;2015(6):CD003348. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003348.pub3.
6
Ultrasound-guided continuous adductor canal block for analgesia after total knee replacement.超声引导下连续收肌管阻滞用于全膝关节置换术后镇痛
Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(23):4077-81.
7
Effect of adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength, mobilization, and pain after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, blinded study.股神经阻滞与收肌管阻滞对全膝关节置换术后股四头肌肌力、活动度和疼痛的影响:一项随机、盲法研究。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):3-10. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000169.
8
Subsartorial adductor canal vs femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee replacement.全膝关节置换术后镇痛:股内侧收肌管阻滞与股神经阻滞的比较
Int Orthop. 2015 Apr;39(4):673-80. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2527-3. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
9
Is continuous adductor canal block better than continuous femoral nerve block after total knee arthroplasty? Effect on ambulation ability, early functional recovery and pain control: a randomized controlled trial.全膝关节置换术后,连续收肌管阻滞是否优于连续股神经阻滞?对步行能力、早期功能恢复及疼痛控制的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Nov;29(11):2224-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.06.010. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
10
Is the pain visual analogue scale linear and responsive to change? An exploration using Rasch analysis.疼痛视觉模拟量表是否呈线性且对变化有反应?一项使用拉施分析的探索。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 12;9(6):e99485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099485. eCollection 2014.