Suppr超能文献

不同外周神经阻滞用于全膝关节置换术患者:一项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。

Different peripheral nerve blocks for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Lishui People's Hospital, Lishui Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, No. 1188 Liyang Street, Lishui, Zhejiang, 323000, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Sep;144(9):4179-4206. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05507-y. Epub 2024 Oct 7.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To comprehensively compare the effect of different peripheral nerve blocks for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were comprehensively searched. The outcomes included postoperative pain, postoperative function, adverse events, oral morphine equivalent (OME), and perioperative indicators. Network plots, forest plots, league tables and rank probabilities were drawn for all outcomes.

RESULTS

Totally 30 studies were included. For postoperative pain, continuous adductor canal block (cACB) + genicular nerve block (GNB) was most likely to be the most effective block regarding rest pain score at 24 h; cACB + GNB was most likely to result in the lowest rest pain score at 48 h; patients undergoing cACB + infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the knee (IPACK) + GNB was most likely to have the lowest motion pain score at 24 h; patients undergoing cACB + GNB was most likely to have the lowest motion pain score at 48 h. For postoperative function, patients undergoing cACB + IPACK + GNB had the highest likelihood to exhibit the shortest time in Timed Up and Go test (TUG); cACB + tibial nerve block (TNB) was most likely to be the most effective block in terms of range of motion (ROM); cACB + IPACK was most likely to be the optimal block concerning the ambulation distance.

CONCLUSION

cACB combined with IPACK/GNB may be the most favorable block after TKA, continuous blocks may be better than single-shot blocks, and combined blocks may be better than separate blocks.

摘要

简介

全面比较不同周围神经阻滞对全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者的影响。

材料和方法

全面检索 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science。结局包括术后疼痛、术后功能、不良事件、口服吗啡等效物(OME)和围手术期指标。对所有结局均绘制网络图、森林图、联赛图和秩概率。

结果

共纳入 30 项研究。对于术后疼痛,连续收肌管阻滞(cACB)+关节囊下神经阻滞(GNB)在 24 小时静息疼痛评分方面最有可能是最有效的阻滞方法;cACB+GNB 最有可能导致 48 小时静息疼痛评分最低;行 cACB+胭动脉与膝关节囊之间浸润(IPACK)+GNB 的患者在 24 小时时运动疼痛评分最低;行 cACB+GNB 的患者在 48 小时时运动疼痛评分最低。对于术后功能,行 cACB+IPACK+GNB 的患者最有可能在计时起立行走测试(TUG)中表现出最短的时间;cACB+胫神经阻滞(TNB)在运动范围(ROM)方面最有可能是最有效的阻滞方法;cACB+IPACK 最有可能是最佳的步行距离阻滞方法。

结论

cACB 联合 IPACK/GNB 可能是 TKA 后最有利的阻滞方法,连续阻滞可能优于单次阻滞,联合阻滞可能优于单独阻滞。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e695/11564395/d790f88e8b42/402_2024_5507_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验