Suppr超能文献

自闭症患者中存在和不存在述情障碍者认知表现的相反模式。

An opposite pattern of cognitive performance in autistic individuals with and without alexithymia.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability.

出版信息

J Abnorm Psychol. 2019 Oct;128(7):735-737. doi: 10.1037/abn0000408.

Abstract

Oakley, Brewer, Bird, and Catmur (2016) investigated whether the Reading the Minds in the Eyes Test (RMET) measures emotion recognition rather than theory of mind (ToM). To explore this, 19 participants with autism and 23 controls, matched on alexithymia traits, were tested with the RMET, as well as the ToM Movie for Assessment of Social Cognition (MASC). The authors found a significant difference between the two groups on the MASC but not on the RMET, but dividing the groups based on alexithymia resulted in a significantly lower performance on the RMET but not on the MASC for the alexithymia group. Therefore, they conclude that difficulties on the RMET are associated with alexithymia, not autism, while difficulties on the MASC are associated with autism, not alexithymia. Here we investigated what seems to be opposite patterns of performance on the two cognitive tasks within the autism group, which modified the authors' interpretation of their data. This was examined by correlating the alexithymia scores with the RMET and a subscale of the MASC scores, referred to as the cognitive MASC. We found a negative correlation between the alexithymia score and the RMET score while also finding a positive correlation between the alexithymia score and the cognitive MASC score in the autism group. Such an opposite pattern of performance suggests the presence of distinct patterns of ToM difficulties within the autism group. This also indicates that, contrary to what is reported by Oakley et al., there is an association between alexithymia and the MASC within the autism group. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

奥克利、布鲁尔、伯德和卡特默(2016)研究了“读心测试(RMET)”是否衡量情感识别而非心理理论(ToM)。为了探索这一点,19 名自闭症患者和 23 名对照者,在 RMET 以及社会认知评估电影测试(MASC)上进行了测试,这些对照者在述情障碍特征上与患者相匹配。作者发现,两组在 MASC 上存在显著差异,但在 RMET 上则没有;但是根据述情障碍将两组分组后,在 RMET 上,述情障碍组的表现明显较低,而在 MASC 上则没有。因此,他们得出结论,RMET 上的困难与述情障碍有关,而不是自闭症,而 MASC 上的困难则与自闭症有关,而不是述情障碍。在这里,我们研究了自闭症组中在这两项认知任务中的表现似乎相反的模式,这改变了作者对其数据的解释。这是通过将述情障碍评分与 RMET 以及 MASC 评分的一个子量表,即认知 MASC 相关联来进行检验的。我们发现,自闭症组的述情障碍评分与 RMET 评分呈负相关,同时发现述情障碍评分与认知 MASC 评分呈正相关。这种表现模式的相反表明,自闭症组中存在不同的心理理论困难模式。这也表明,与奥克利等人的报告相反,自闭症组中述情障碍与 MASC 之间存在关联。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验