ShamsiMeymandi Simin, Dabiri Shahriar, ZeynadiniMeymand Alireza, Iranpour Maryam, Khalili Maryam, Alijani Sorour, Aflatoonian Mahin
Pathology and Stem Cell Research Center, Dermatopathology Department, Afzalipour Teaching Hospital, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Pathology and Stem Cell Research Center, Afzalipour Teaching Hospital, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Iran J Pathol. 2019 Summer;14(3):193-196. doi: 10.30699/ijp.2019.82907.1781. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is classified into BCC1 or low risk (nodular, superficial type) and BCC2 or high risk (micronodular, morpheaform, infiltrative, and basosquamous types) based on clinical behavior. This study attempts to evaluate immunohistochemical (IHC) findings and clinical features associated with local aggressiveness and recurrence in BCC lesions.
This is a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted on 42 paraffin blocks (22 BCC1, 20 in BCC2) at Pathology Department of Afzalipour Teaching Hospital. First, demographic features of the patients were recorded and pathology blocks were classified by two dermatopathologists based on histopathological types of BCC1 and BCC2. Then, primary monoclonal antibodies including CD10, CD1a, SMA, Ki67, CD34, and P53 were utilized for IHC study. We compared BCC1 and BCC2 according to IHC markers, demographic features of patients, and tumoral features.
The mean number of Langerhans cells (LCs) within epidermis above tumor mass was 14+1.92 and 4.7±1.23 in BCC1 and BCC2, respectively; these results show a significant difference between the two groups (=0.001). P53 was positive in 41.13±6.39% and 74.5 ±6.26% of the tumor cells in BCC1 and BCC2 groups, which was statistically significant (=0.001). Also, the mean number of blood vessels was 14.40±1.30 and 21.40±1.97 in BCC1 and BCC2, that was statistically significant (=0.005).
Higher numbers of angiogenesis (SMA positive) and positive P53 were observed in BCC2 than BCC1. Also, more active positive CD1a cells were observed in BCC1 compared to BCC2.
根据临床行为,基底细胞癌(BCC)分为BCC1型或低风险型(结节型、表浅型)和BCC2型或高风险型(微结节型、硬斑病样型、浸润型和基底鳞状细胞型)。本研究旨在评估与BCC病变局部侵袭性和复发相关的免疫组化(IHC)结果及临床特征。
这是一项在阿夫扎利普尔教学医院病理科对42个石蜡块(22个BCC1型,20个BCC2型)进行的横断面描述性研究。首先,记录患者的人口统计学特征,由两位皮肤病理学家根据BCC1和BCC2的组织病理学类型对病理块进行分类。然后,使用包括CD10、CD1a、平滑肌肌动蛋白(SMA)、Ki67、CD34和P53在内的原发性单克隆抗体进行免疫组化研究。我们根据免疫组化标志物、患者的人口统计学特征和肿瘤特征对BCC1和BCC2进行比较。
肿瘤块上方表皮内朗格汉斯细胞(LCs)的平均数量在BCC1型和BCC2型中分别为14±1.92和4.7±1.23;两组结果显示出显著差异(P=0.001)。P53在BCC1组和BCC2组肿瘤细胞中的阳性率分别为41.13±6.39%和74.5±6.26%,具有统计学意义(P=0.001)。此外,BCC1型和BCC2型中血管的平均数量分别为14.40±1.30和21.40±1.97,具有统计学意义(P=0.005)。
与BCC1型相比,BCC2型中观察到更高的血管生成数量(SMA阳性)和P53阳性。此外,与BCC2型相比,BCC1型中观察到更多活跃的CD1a阳性细胞。