Suppr超能文献

在商用设备上对“弗赖堡视力VEP”的评估。

Evaluation of the "Freiburg Acuity VEP" on Commercial Equipment.

作者信息

Bach Michael, Farmer Jeffrey D

机构信息

Section for Functional Vision Research, Eye Center, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Killianstr. 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.

Diagnosys LLC, Lowell, USA.

出版信息

Doc Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;140(2):139-145. doi: 10.1007/s10633-019-09726-2. Epub 2019 Oct 4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the implementation and outcome quality of the Freiburg Acuity VEP methodology (Bach et al. in Br J Ophthalmol 92:396-403, 2008) on the Diagnosys Espion Profile and E3 electrophysiology systems.

METHODS

We recorded visual evoked potentials (VEPs) from both eyes of 24 participants, where visual acuity (VA) was either full or reduced with scatter foils to approximately 0.5 and 0.8 LogMAR, resulting in a total of 144 recordings. Behavioral VA was measured in each case under the same conditions using the Freiburg Acuity Test (FrACT); VEP-based acuity was assessed with the "heuristic algorithm," which automatically selects points for regression to zero amplitude.

RESULTS

Behavioral VA ranged from - 0.2 to 1.0 LogMAR. The fully automatic heuristic VEP algorithm resulted in 8 of 144 recordings (6%) that were scored as "no result." The other 136 recordings (94%) had an outcome of - 0.20 to 1.3 LogMAR (which corresponds to a range of 20/12.5-20/400, or 6/3.8-6/120, in Snellen ratios; or 1.6-0.1 in decimal acuity). The heuristic VEP algorithm agreed with the behavioral VA to within ± 0.31 LogMAR (95% limits of agreement), which is equivalent to approximately three lines on a VA chart.

CONCLUSIONS

The successful implementation of the Freiburg Acuity VEP "heuristic algorithm" on a commercial system makes this capability available to a wider group of users. The limits of agreement of ± 0.31 LogMAR are close to the original implementation at the University of Freiburg and we believe are clinically acceptable for a fully automatic, largely objective assessment of visual acuity.

摘要

目的

评估在Diagnosys Espion Profile和E3电生理系统上弗赖堡视力VEP方法(Bach等人,《英国眼科杂志》92:396 - 403,2008年)的实施情况和结果质量。

方法

我们记录了24名参与者双眼的视觉诱发电位(VEP),其中视力(VA)要么正常,要么通过散射箔片降低至约0.5和0.8 LogMAR,共进行了144次记录。在相同条件下,使用弗赖堡视力测试(FrACT)测量每种情况下的行为视力;基于VEP的视力通过“启发式算法”进行评估,该算法会自动选择用于回归到零振幅的点。

结果

行为视力范围为 - 0.2至1.0 LogMAR。全自动启发式VEP算法在144次记录中有8次(6%)被判定为“无结果”。其他136次记录(94%)的结果为 - 0.20至1.3 LogMAR(对应于Snellen比率范围为20/12.5 - 20/400,或6/3.8 - 6/120;或小数视力范围为1.6 - 0.1)。启发式VEP算法与行为视力的一致性在±0.31 LogMAR范围内(95%一致性界限),这相当于视力表上大约三行。

结论

弗赖堡视力VEP“启发式算法”在商业系统上的成功实施,使更多用户能够使用此功能。±0.31 LogMAR的一致性界限与弗赖堡大学的原始实施情况相近,我们认为对于全自动、基本客观的视力评估在临床上是可接受的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验