• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于地理空间分析的家庭医生对结直肠癌筛查依从性的影响

Geospatial analysis of the influence of family doctor on colorectal cancer screening adherence.

机构信息

Department of Experimental Medicine, Public Health Section, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Umbria Cancer Registry, Perugia, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Oct 4;14(10):e0222396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222396. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0222396
PMID:31584952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6777754/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the well-recognised relevance of screening in colorectal cancer (CRC) control, adherence to screening is often suboptimal. Improving adherence represents an important public health strategy. We investigated the influence of family doctors (FDs) as determinant of CRC screening adherence by comparing each FDs practice participation probability to that of the residents in the same geographic areas using the whole population geocoded.

METHODS

We used multilevel logistic regression model to investigate factors associated with CRC screening adherence, among 333,843 people at their first screening invitation. Standardized Adherence Rates (SAR) by age, gender, and socioeconomic status were calculated comparing FDs practices to the residents in the same geographic areas using geocoded target population.

RESULTS

Screening adherence increased from 41.0% (95% CI, 40.8-41.2) in 2006-2008 to 44.7% (95% CI, 44.5-44.9) in 2011-2012. Males, the most deprived and foreign-born people showed low adherence. FD practices and the percentage of foreign-born people in a practice were significant clustering factors. SAR for 145 (21.4%) FDs practices differed significantly from people living in the same areas. Predicted probabilities of adherence were 31.7% and 49.0% for FDs with low and high adherence, respectively.

DISCUSSION

FDs showed a direct and independent effect to the CRC screening adherence of the people living in their practice. FDs with significantly high adherence level could be the key to adherence improvement.

IMPACT

Most deprived individuals and foreigners represent relevant targets for interventions in public health aimed to improve CRC screening adherence.

摘要

背景

尽管筛查在结直肠癌(CRC)防控中具有明显的相关性,但筛查的依从性往往并不理想。提高依从性是一项重要的公共卫生策略。我们通过比较每个家庭医生(FD)的实践参与概率与同一地理区域的居民的概率,研究了 FD 作为 CRC 筛查依从性决定因素的影响,使用了整个人口地理编码。

方法

我们使用多水平逻辑回归模型,调查了 333843 名首次筛查邀请者中与 CRC 筛查依从性相关的因素。使用地理编码目标人群,比较 FD 实践与同一地理区域的居民,计算了按年龄、性别和社会经济地位标准化的依从率(SAR)。

结果

筛查依从性从 2006-2008 年的 41.0%(95%CI,40.8-41.2)增加到 2011-2012 年的 44.7%(95%CI,44.5-44.9)。男性、最贫困和外国出生的人依从性较低。FD 实践和实践中外国出生人口的比例是显著的聚类因素。145(21.4%)个 FD 实践的 SAR 与生活在同一地区的人有显著差异。FD 实践中低依从性和高依从性的预测依从率分别为 31.7%和 49.0%。

讨论

FD 对生活在其实践中的人的 CRC 筛查依从性有直接和独立的影响。具有显著高依从性水平的 FD 可能是提高依从性的关键。

影响

最贫困的人和外国人是旨在提高 CRC 筛查依从性的公共卫生干预的重要目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a45/6777754/16579e6abfa7/pone.0222396.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a45/6777754/13d68234f880/pone.0222396.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a45/6777754/0f15bef34b7e/pone.0222396.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a45/6777754/16579e6abfa7/pone.0222396.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a45/6777754/13d68234f880/pone.0222396.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a45/6777754/0f15bef34b7e/pone.0222396.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a45/6777754/16579e6abfa7/pone.0222396.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Geospatial analysis of the influence of family doctor on colorectal cancer screening adherence.基于地理空间分析的家庭医生对结直肠癌筛查依从性的影响
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 4;14(10):e0222396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222396. eCollection 2019.
2
Viewpoints of the target population regarding barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in the Czech Republic.目标人群对捷克共和国结直肠癌筛查障碍和促进因素的观点。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar 7;25(9):1132-1141. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1132.
3
Population-based screening for colorectal cancer using an immunochemical faecal occult blood test: a comparison of two invitation strategies.基于人群的免疫化学粪便潜血试验筛查结直肠癌:两种邀请策略的比较。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2012 Oct;36(5):e317-24. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 May 5.
4
Factors that could influence women's participation in colorectal cancer screening: an Italian study.可能影响女性参与结直肠癌筛查的因素:一项意大利研究。
Ann Ig. 2017 Mar-Apr;29(2):151-160. doi: 10.7416/ai.2017.2142.
5
A national survey of primary care physicians' colorectal cancer screening recommendations and practices.一项关于初级保健医生结直肠癌筛查建议与实践的全国性调查。
Prev Med. 2003 Mar;36(3):352-62. doi: 10.1016/s0091-7435(02)00066-x.
6
Family history and colorectal cancer screening: a survey of physician knowledge and practice patterns.家族病史与结直肠癌筛查:医生知识与实践模式调查
Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Apr;97(4):1031-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05624.x.
7
[Compliance rate of screening colonoscopy and its associated factors among high-risk populations of colorectal cancer in urban China].[中国城市结直肠癌高危人群筛查结肠镜检查的依从率及其相关因素]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Mar 6;52(3):231-237. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2018.03.004.
8
[Analysis of predictive factors for non-adherence to organized screening for colorectal and breast cancers in the pre-pandemic period (2018-2019) in Lombardy Region (Northern Italy)].[意大利北部伦巴第大区大流行前时期(2018 - 2019年)结直肠癌和乳腺癌有组织筛查不依从的预测因素分析]
Epidemiol Prev. 2024 Mar-Apr;48(2):118-129. doi: 10.19191/EP24.2.A720.039.
9
Determinants of adherence to screening by colonoscopy in individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer.有结直肠癌家族史人群行结肠镜筛查依从性的影响因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Nov;93(2):272-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.06.029. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
10
Assessing Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence of Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries Age 76 to 95 Years.评估年龄在76至95岁之间的医疗保险按服务收费受益人的结直肠癌筛查依从性。
J Oncol Pract. 2016 Jun;12(6):e670-80. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.009118. Epub 2016 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of individual and contextual socioeconomic factors on colorectal cancer screening adherence in Turin, Italy: a multilevel analysis.意大利都灵个体及背景社会经济因素对结直肠癌筛查依从性的影响:一项多层次分析
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 1;25(1):1235. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22396-x.
2
Language as a barrier to colorectal cancer screening in flanders: an ecological study.语言作为弗拉芒地区结直肠癌筛查的障碍:一项生态学研究。
Arch Public Health. 2025 Mar 25;83(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01541-3.
3
Geospatial distribution of the adoption of dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors for type 2 diabetes among Medicare beneficiaries.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethnic density and cancer: A review of the evidence.民族密度与癌症:证据回顾。
Cancer. 2018 May 1;124(9):1877-1903. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31177. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
2
Perceptions of colorectal cancer screening and recommendation behaviors among physicians in Korea.韩国医生对结直肠癌筛查的认知及推荐行为。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Dec 16;17(1):860. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3881-5.
3
Reducing the socioeconomic gradient in uptake of the NHS bowel cancer screening Programme using a simplified supplementary information leaflet: a cluster-randomised trial.
医疗保险受益人中2型糖尿病患者使用二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂的地理空间分布情况。
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2025 Feb;52:100711. doi: 10.1016/j.sste.2025.100711. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
4
Effectiveness of tailored talks between a cancer screening specialist and general practitioners to improve the uptake of colorectal cancer screening in Ancona (Italy) during the pandemic period.在大流行期间,癌症筛查专家与全科医生之间进行针对性谈话以提高意大利安科纳地区结直肠癌筛查接受率的有效性。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2024 Dec;30(1):2340672. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2340672. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
5
Quantifying the Impact of Family Doctors on the Care Experiences of Patients with Cancer: Exploring Evidence from the 2021 Ambulatory Oncology Patient Satisfaction Survey in Alberta, Canada.量化家庭医生对癌症患者护理体验的影响:探索加拿大阿尔伯塔省 2021 年肿瘤门诊患者满意度调查的证据。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Jan 4;30(1):641-652. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30010049.
6
Addressing Cancer Screening Inequities by Promoting Cancer Prevention Knowledge, Awareness, Self-Efficacy, and Screening Uptake Among Low-Income and Illiterate Immigrant Women in France.在法国,通过提高贫困和文盲移民妇女的癌症预防知识、意识、自我效能和筛查率来解决癌症筛查不平等问题。
Int J Public Health. 2021 Jun 15;66:1604055. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2021.1604055. eCollection 2021.
7
Area-Level Determinants in Colorectal Cancer Spatial Clustering Studies: A Systematic Review.基于区域水平的结直肠癌空间聚类研究的决定因素:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 6;18(19):10486. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910486.
8
Spatial Insights for Understanding Colorectal Cancer Screening in Disproportionately Affected Populations, Central Texas, 2019.了解中得克萨斯州受影响不成比例人群中结直肠癌筛查情况的空间洞察,2019 年。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2021 Mar 4;18:E20. doi: 10.5888/pcd18.200362.
9
What are the contextual risk factors for low colorectal cancer screening uptake in El Paso County, Texas? Spatial cross-sectional analysis.德克萨斯州埃尔帕索县结直肠癌筛查参与率低的情境风险因素有哪些?空间横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 10;10(10):e038342. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038342.
采用简化补充信息传单降低 NHS 肠癌筛查计划的社会经济梯度参与率:一项聚类随机试验。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Aug 14;17(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3512-1.
4
Interventions to increase uptake of faecal tests for colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.提高结直肠癌筛查粪便检测接受率的干预措施:一项系统评价
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2018 May;27(3):227-236. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000344.
5
Invitation coverage and participation in Italian cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening programmes.意大利宫颈癌、乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查项目的邀请覆盖范围与参与情况。
J Med Screen. 2018 Mar;25(1):17-23. doi: 10.1177/0969141317704476. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
6
Intermediate and advanced topics in multilevel logistic regression analysis.多级逻辑回归分析中的中级和高级主题。
Stat Med. 2017 Sep 10;36(20):3257-3277. doi: 10.1002/sim.7336. Epub 2017 May 23.
7
GP participation in increasing uptake in a national bowel cancer screening programme: the PEARL project.全科医生参与提高全国肠癌筛查项目的参与率:PEARL项目
Br J Cancer. 2017 Jun 6;116(12):1551-1557. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.129. Epub 2017 May 18.
8
Assessing global transitions in human development and colorectal cancer incidence.评估人类发展与结直肠癌发病率的全球转变。
Int J Cancer. 2017 Jun 15;140(12):2709-2715. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30686. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
9
Primary Care Provider Perceptions of Colorectal Cancer Screening Barriers: Implications for Designing Quality Improvement Interventions.初级保健提供者对结直肠癌筛查障碍的看法:对设计质量改进干预措施的启示
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017;2017:1619747. doi: 10.1155/2017/1619747. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
10
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2564-2575. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5989.