• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

切口疝无法通过患者报告的诊断问卷进行诊断。

Incisional Hernia Cannot Be Diagnosed by a Patient-Reported Diagnostic Questionnaire.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2020 Jan;245:656-662. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.030. Epub 2019 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.030
PMID:31585352
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Incisional hernia (IH) is one of the most frequent complications after abdominal surgery. Follow-up with regard to IH remains challenging. Physical examination and imaging to diagnose IH are time-consuming and costly, require devotion of both the physician and patient, and are often not prioritized. Therefore, a patient-reported diagnostic questionnaire for the diagnosis of IH was developed. Objective of this study was to validate this questionnaire in a consecutive sample of patients.

METHODS

All patients above 18 y of age who underwent abdominal surgery with a midline incision at least 12 mo ago were eligible for inclusion. Included patients visited the outpatient clinic where they filled out the diagnostic questionnaire and underwent physical examination. The questionnaire answers were compared with the physical examination results. The diagnostic accuracy of the entire questionnaire was assessed by multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

In total, 241 patients visited the outpatient clinic prospectively. 54 (22%) patients were diagnosed with IH during physical examination. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the diagnostic questionnaire was 0.82. Sensitivity and specificity were respectively 81.5% and 77.5%. The positive and negative predictive values were 51.2% and 94%, respectively. Ten (19%) patients with IH were missed by the questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

The patient-reported diagnostic questionnaire as currently proposed cannot be used to diagnose IH. However, given the high negative predictive value, the questionnaire might be used to rule out an IH. Long-term follow-up for the diagnosis of IH should be performed by clinical examination.

摘要

背景

切口疝(IH)是腹部手术后最常见的并发症之一。IH 的随访仍然具有挑战性。物理检查和影像学检查来诊断 IH 既耗时又昂贵,需要医生和患者共同投入,而且往往不被优先考虑。因此,开发了一种用于诊断 IH 的患者报告诊断问卷。本研究的目的是在连续的患者样本中验证该问卷。

方法

所有年龄在 18 岁以上、至少 12 个月前接受过中线切口腹部手术的患者均有资格入选。入选患者到门诊就诊,填写诊断问卷并进行体格检查。将问卷答案与体格检查结果进行比较。通过多变量逻辑回归评估整个问卷的诊断准确性。

结果

共有 241 名患者前瞻性地到门诊就诊。54 名(22%)患者在体格检查中被诊断为 IH。诊断问卷的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.82。敏感性和特异性分别为 81.5%和 77.5%。阳性和阴性预测值分别为 51.2%和 94%。10 名(19%)IH 患者被问卷遗漏。

结论

目前提出的患者报告诊断问卷不能用于诊断 IH。然而,鉴于其较高的阴性预测值,该问卷可用于排除 IH。应通过临床检查对 IH 进行长期随访诊断。

相似文献

1
Incisional Hernia Cannot Be Diagnosed by a Patient-Reported Diagnostic Questionnaire.切口疝无法通过患者报告的诊断问卷进行诊断。
J Surg Res. 2020 Jan;245:656-662. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.030. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
2
Patient reported outcome measurements in the diagnosis of incisional hernia: PROMIS questionnaire, a pilot study.患者报告结局测量在切口疝诊断中的应用:PROMIS问卷,一项初步研究。
J Surg Res. 2016 Jun 15;203(2):378-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
3
Incisional hernia in pediatric surgery - experience at a single UK tertiary centre.小儿外科中的切口疝——英国一家三级中心的经验
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Nov;51(11):1791-1794. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.013. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
4
Midline incision vs. transverse incision for specimen extraction is not a significant risk factor for developing incisional hernia after minimally invasive colorectal surgery: multivariable analysis of a large cohort from a single tertiary center in Korea.经多变量分析,微创结直肠手术后,对于发生切口疝而言,标本提取的中线切口与横向切口并非显著风险因素:来自韩国单一三级中心的大样本队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):1199-1205. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08388-z. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
5
Comparing different modalities for the diagnosis of incisional hernia: a systematic review.比较不同方式诊断切口疝:一项系统评价。
Hernia. 2018 Apr;22(2):229-242. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1725-5. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
6
Predicting incisional hernia after bariatric surgery: a risk stratification model based upon 2161 operations.预测减重手术后的切口疝:基于2161例手术的风险分层模型
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Sep-Oct;12(8):1466-1473. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.03.022. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
7
Are women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse treated by open mesh sacrocolpopexy at risk of secondary incisional hernia?接受开放式网片骶骨阴道固定术治疗的晚期盆腔器官脱垂女性是否有发生继发性切口疝的风险?
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Nov;26(11):1673-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2758-x. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
8
Incisional Hernia After Midline Versus Transverse Specimen Extraction Incision: A Randomized Trial in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colectomy.腹腔镜结肠切除术患者中线切口与横向标本提取切口术后切口疝:一项随机试验。
Ann Surg. 2018 Jul;268(1):41-47. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002615.
9
Retrospective observational study on the incidence of incisional hernias after reversal of a temporary diverting ileostomy following rectal carcinoma resection with follow-up CT scans.一项关于直肠癌切除术后临时转流性回肠造口回纳术后切口疝发生率的回顾性观察研究,并进行随访CT扫描。
Hernia. 2016 Apr;20(2):271-7. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1419-9. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
10
Incidence and predictors of incisional hernia after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.细胞减灭术和腹腔内热化疗后切口疝的发生率和预测因素。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2019;36(1):812-816. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2019.1641634.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical outcomes of open abdominal wall reconstruction with the use of a polypropylene reinforced tissue matrix: a multicenter retrospective study.使用聚丙烯增强组织基质进行开放式腹壁重建的临床结果:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Hernia. 2022 Oct;26(5):1241-1250. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02604-y. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
2
Long-term outcomes after contaminated complex abdominal wall reconstruction.污染性复杂腹壁重建术后的长期结果。
Hernia. 2020 Jun;24(3):459-468. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02124-7. Epub 2020 Feb 20.