• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者报告结局测量在切口疝诊断中的应用:PROMIS问卷,一项初步研究。

Patient reported outcome measurements in the diagnosis of incisional hernia: PROMIS questionnaire, a pilot study.

作者信息

Jairam An P, Wilson Michael, Steyerberg Ewout W, Jeekel Johannes, Lange Johannes F

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2016 Jun 15;203(2):378-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2016.03.005
PMID:27363646
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Incisional hernia (IH) is the most frequent complication after abdominal surgery. Long-term follow-up is crucial. Patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) are able to monitor patients' disease progression after treatment. Until now, there are no PROMs that assess patients after abdominal surgery or that detects patients with IH. We aimed to develop a reliable questionnaire to assist in diagnosing IH, called the "PROMIS questionnaire": Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements in the Diagnosis of Incisional Hernias. In this pilot study, the reliability of this questionnaire is being determined.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with IH between 2013 and 2014 were included. A questionnaire with seven questions was developed. Patients were asked whether they thought they had IH, whether they felt any pain at the site of the scar, and whether they saw or felt a lump or a bulge. Furthermore, smoking history and patients' weight and height were taken into account. Patients were approached three times by telephone, with an interval of 1 week. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and sensitivity were measured.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients were included. Test-retest reliability was 1.0, and internal consistency was 0.56. The question regarding patients' pain was least consistent with other questions. The overall sensitivity of the questionnaire was 95%.

CONCLUSIONS

The PROMIS questionnaire is a highly reliable questionnaire, but the internal consistency is modest. The clinical relevancy of pain in IH patients is essential. Therefore, this question will be kept in the current PROMIS questionnaire. It needs further validation in a prospective cohort study, to use it as a diagnostic tool in the future to detect IH.

摘要

背景

切口疝(IH)是腹部手术后最常见的并发症。长期随访至关重要。患者报告结局测量(PROMs)能够监测患者治疗后的疾病进展。到目前为止,尚无用于评估腹部手术后患者或检测切口疝患者的PROMs。我们旨在开发一种可靠的问卷,以协助诊断切口疝,即“PROMIS问卷”:切口疝诊断中的患者报告结局测量。在这项初步研究中,正在确定该问卷的可靠性。

方法

纳入2013年至2014年间诊断为切口疝的患者。编制了一份包含七个问题的问卷。询问患者是否认为自己患有切口疝,是否在瘢痕部位感到疼痛,以及是否看到或摸到肿块或隆起。此外,还考虑了吸烟史以及患者的体重和身高。通过电话对患者进行三次随访,间隔为1周。测量了重测信度、内部一致性和敏感性。

结果

纳入43例患者。重测信度为1.0,内部一致性为0.56。关于患者疼痛的问题与其他问题的一致性最差。问卷的总体敏感性为95%。

结论

PROMIS问卷是一种高度可靠的问卷,但内部一致性一般。切口疝患者疼痛的临床相关性至关重要。因此,这个问题将保留在当前的PROMIS问卷中。需要在前瞻性队列研究中进一步验证,以便将来将其用作检测切口疝的诊断工具。

相似文献

1
Patient reported outcome measurements in the diagnosis of incisional hernia: PROMIS questionnaire, a pilot study.患者报告结局测量在切口疝诊断中的应用:PROMIS问卷,一项初步研究。
J Surg Res. 2016 Jun 15;203(2):378-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
2
Incisional Hernia Cannot Be Diagnosed by a Patient-Reported Diagnostic Questionnaire.切口疝无法通过患者报告的诊断问卷进行诊断。
J Surg Res. 2020 Jan;245:656-662. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.030. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
3
The arthritic patients' perspective of measuring treatment efficacy: Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) as a quality tool.关节炎患者对治疗效果的评估:患者报告的体验测量(PREMs)作为一种质量工具。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014 Jul-Aug;32(4):547-52. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
4
A Risk Model and Cost Analysis of Incisional Hernia After Elective, Abdominal Surgery Based Upon 12,373 Cases: The Case for Targeted Prophylactic Intervention.基于12373例病例的择期腹部手术后切口疝的风险模型与成本分析:靶向预防性干预的案例
Ann Surg. 2016 May;263(5):1010-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001394.
5
Patient reported outcomes after incisional hernia repair-establishing the ventral hernia recurrence inventory.切口疝修补术后患者报告的结局——建立腹疝复发量表
Am J Surg. 2016 Jul;212(1):81-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.06.007. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
6
Are women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse treated by open mesh sacrocolpopexy at risk of secondary incisional hernia?接受开放式网片骶骨阴道固定术治疗的晚期盆腔器官脱垂女性是否有发生继发性切口疝的风险?
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Nov;26(11):1673-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2758-x. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
7
Predicting incisional hernia after bariatric surgery: a risk stratification model based upon 2161 operations.预测减重手术后的切口疝:基于2161例手术的风险分层模型
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Sep-Oct;12(8):1466-1473. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.03.022. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
8
Comparing different modalities for the diagnosis of incisional hernia: a systematic review.比较不同方式诊断切口疝:一项系统评价。
Hernia. 2018 Apr;22(2):229-242. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1725-5. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
9
Long-term results of retromuscular hernia repair: a single center experience.肌后疝修补术的长期结果:单中心经验
Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Jun 20;27:132. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.27.132.9367. eCollection 2017.
10
Incisional Hernia After Liver Transplant.肝移植术后切口疝
Exp Clin Transplant. 2017 Feb;15(Suppl 1):185-189. doi: 10.6002/ect.mesot2016.P65.

引用本文的文献

1
Hernia reduction following laparotomy using small stitch abdominal wall closure with and without mesh augmentation (the HULC trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.开腹手术后使用小缝线腹壁闭合术加或不加网片增强进行疝修补(HULC试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2019 Dec 16;20(1):738. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3921-3.
2
Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Ventral Hernia Repair: Designing a Qualitative Assessment Tool.患者报告的腹疝修补术后结果:定性评估工具的设计。
Patient. 2018 Apr;11(2):225-234. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0275-3.