On Ising models and algorithms for the construction of symptom networks in psychopathological research.

During the past 5 to 10 years, an estimation method known as has been used extensively to produce symptom networks (or, more precisely, symptom dependence graphs) from binary data in psychopathological research. The method is based on a particular type of Ising model that corresponds to binary pairwise Markov random fields, and its popularity is due, in part, to an efficient estimation process that is based on a series of ₁-regularized logistic regressions. In this article, we offer an unprecedented critique of the Ising model and . We provide a careful assessment of the conditions that underlie the Ising model as well as specific limitations associated with the estimation algorithm. This assessment leads to serious concerns regarding the implementation of in psychopathological research. Some potential strategies for eliminating or, at least, mitigating these concerns include (a) the use of partitioning or mixture modeling to account for unobserved heterogeneity in the sample of respondents, and (b) the use of co-occurrence measures for symptom similarity to either replace or supplement the covariance/correlation measure associated with . Two psychopathological data sets are used to highlight the concerns that are raised in the critique. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).