• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知偏差、黑暗模式和“隐私悖论”。

Cognitive biases, dark patterns, and the 'privacy paradox'.

机构信息

Princeton University, Center for Information Technology Policy, Princeton, NJ 08540, United States; New York Law School, 185 West Broadway, New York, NY 10013, United States.

出版信息

Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Feb;31:105-109. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.025. Epub 2019 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.025
PMID:31590106
Abstract

Scholars and commentators often argue that individuals do not care about their privacy, and that users routinely trade privacy for convenience. This ignores the cognitive biases and design tactics platforms use to manipulate users into disclosing information. This essay highlights some of those cognitive biases - from hyperbolic discounting to the problem of overchoice - and discusses the ways in which platform design can manipulate disclosure. It then explains how current law allows this manipulative and anti-consumer behavior to continue and proposes a new approach to reign in the phenomenon.

摘要

学者和评论员常常认为,个人并不关心自己的隐私,用户通常会为了方便而牺牲隐私。这种观点忽略了认知偏见和平台设计策略,这些策略可以操纵用户披露信息。本文重点介绍了一些认知偏见,从过度贴现到选择过多的问题,并讨论了平台设计如何操纵披露信息。然后,本文解释了现行法律如何允许这种操纵和反消费者的行为继续存在,并提出了一种新的方法来控制这种现象。

相似文献

1
Cognitive biases, dark patterns, and the 'privacy paradox'.认知偏差、黑暗模式和“隐私悖论”。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Feb;31:105-109. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.025. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
2
Mastering the challenge of balancing self-disclosure and privacy in social media.掌握社交媒体中自我表露和隐私保护之间的平衡挑战。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Feb;31:67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.003. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
3
Informing the design of better privacy policies.为制定更好的隐私政策提供信息。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Feb;31:89-93. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.007. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
4
Health Privacy Information Self-Disclosure in Online Health Community.在线健康社区中的健康隐私信息自披露。
Front Public Health. 2021 Feb 4;8:602792. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.602792. eCollection 2020.
5
Disclosure of genetic information to at-risk relatives: privacy law and professional guidance in New Zealand.向高危亲属披露遗传信息:新西兰的隐私法与专业指南
J Prim Health Care. 2011 Sep 1;3(3):237-9.
6
Privacy and disclosure of official records and information. Final rules.官方记录与信息的隐私及披露。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2007 Apr 27;72(81):20935-42.
7
Disentangling privacy from property: toward a deeper understanding of genetic privacy.区分隐私与财产:迈向对基因隐私的更深入理解
George Washington Law Rev. 2004 Apr;72(4):737-814.
8
The Fitbit Fault Line: Two Proposals to Protect Health and Fitness Data at Work.Fitbit故障线:两项保护工作场所健康与健身数据的提议。
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics. 2016 Winter;16(1):1-49.
9
Do Smartphone Power Users Protect Mobile Privacy Better than Nonpower Users? Exploring Power Usage as a Factor in Mobile Privacy Protection and Disclosure.智能手机重度用户比非重度用户更能保护移动隐私吗?探究手机使用情况在移动隐私保护和披露方面的作用。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2016 Mar;19(3):179-85. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2015.0340. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
10
Personal privacy and common goods: a framework for balancing under the national health information privacy rule.个人隐私与公共利益:国家健康信息隐私规则下的平衡框架
Minn Law Rev. 2002 Jun;86(6):1439-79.

引用本文的文献

1
The analysis of marketing performance in E-commerce live broadcast platform based on big data and deep learning.基于大数据和深度学习的电子商务直播平台营销绩效分析
Sci Rep. 2025 May 4;15(1):15594. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00546-w.
2
Relevance theory for mapping cognitive biases in fact-checking: an argumentative approach.用于在事实核查中映射认知偏差的关联理论:一种论证方法。
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 12;15:1468879. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1468879. eCollection 2024.
3
Comparing Decentralized Learning Methods for Health Data Models to Nondecentralized Alternatives: Protocol for a Systematic Review.
比较健康数据模型的去中心化学习方法与非去中心化替代方法:一项系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jun 19;12:e45823. doi: 10.2196/45823.
4
Human-Centered Design to Address Biases in Artificial Intelligence.以人为中心的设计来解决人工智能中的偏见。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 24;25:e43251. doi: 10.2196/43251.
5
The Impact of Patient-Centered Care on Cancer Patients' QOC, Self-Efficacy, and Trust Towards Doctors: Analysis of a National Survey.以患者为中心的护理对癌症患者的生活质量、自我效能感及对医生的信任的影响:一项全国性调查分析
J Patient Exp. 2023 Jan 17;10:23743735231151533. doi: 10.1177/23743735231151533. eCollection 2023.
6
"Now You See Me, Now You Don't": How Digital Consumers Manage Their Online Visibility in Game-Like Conditions.“你看得到我,现在又看不到了”:数字消费者如何在类似游戏的情境中管理自己的网络可见性。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 13;13:795264. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.795264. eCollection 2022.
7
Addressing Online Health Privacy Risks for Older Adults: A Perspective on Ethical Considerations and Recommendations.应对老年人在线健康隐私风险:伦理考量与建议视角
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2022 Apr 21;8:23337214221095705. doi: 10.1177/23337214221095705. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.