Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, D- 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Department of Psychology, University Siegen, Adolf-Reichwein-Str. 2a, D- 57076, Siegen, Germany.
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Oct 7;18(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0463-0.
Increasing the quality of life with short interventions for vulnerable patients is one of the objectives of palliative care. Biographical approaches are used in a range of different interventions which may require considerable resources of staff time and energy. This study evaluated the feasibility of training hospice volunteers in biographical interviews of patients confronted with a life-limiting disease. For the purpose of this study, we evaluated resources such as time needed for training, coordination and supervision, outcome such as completion of the intervention in appropriate time and risks such as causing distress in patients or volunteers as major determinants of feasibility.
Nine volunteers from a hospice service attended an advanced training with an introduction to palliative care, biography work, interview techniques, transcribing and writing. Volunteers interviewed a patient and developed a written narrative from the interview. Volunteers completed a questionnaire before training and were interviewed at the end of the project. The interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and evaluated using descriptive and qualitative content analysis.
Patients provided positive feedback from the intervention. Volunteers felt that their involvement was personally rewarding and were moved by the courage and confidence of the patients. There were no systematic problems or negative experiences reported neither by volunteers nor by patients.
We found the use of volunteers for biography work with patients in palliative care feasible and effective in this study. Volunteers needed supervision and ongoing support in providing this intervention.
通过对弱势患者进行短期干预来提高生活质量是姑息治疗的目标之一。传记方法被应用于一系列不同的干预措施中,这些干预措施可能需要大量的员工时间和精力。本研究评估了在面临生命有限疾病的患者中对临终关怀志愿者进行传记访谈培训的可行性。为此,我们评估了培训、协调和监督所需的时间等资源、干预措施在适当时间内完成的结果以及给患者或志愿者造成痛苦等风险作为可行性的主要决定因素。
来自临终关怀服务的 9 名志愿者参加了高级培训,培训内容包括姑息治疗、传记工作、访谈技巧、转录和写作。志愿者采访了一名患者,并根据访谈内容撰写了一份书面叙述。志愿者在培训前填写了一份问卷,并在项目结束时接受了采访。采访内容被录音、转录,并使用描述性和定性内容分析进行评估。
患者对干预措施给予了积极的反馈。志愿者认为他们的参与是个人有益的,并被患者的勇气和信心所感动。志愿者和患者都没有报告系统性问题或负面体验。
我们发现,在本研究中,使用志愿者对姑息治疗中的患者进行传记工作是可行且有效的。志愿者在提供这种干预措施时需要监督和持续支持。