• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症患者对癌症相关在线信息的信任程度:一项系统综述

The extent to which cancer patients trust in cancer-related online information: a systematic review.

作者信息

Lange Lukas, Peikert Mona Leandra, Bleich Christiane, Schulz Holger

机构信息

Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2019 Sep 30;7:e7634. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7634. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.7634
PMID:31592341
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6776066/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of the internet to satisfy information needs is widespread among cancer patients. Patients' decisions regarding whether to act upon the information they find strongly depend on the trustworthiness of the information and the medium. Patients who are younger, more highly educated and female are more likely to trust online information. The objectives of this systematic review were to examine the extent to which cancer patients trust in cancer-related online information, internet websites as a source of cancer-related information or the internet as a medium of cancer information.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using five databases (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42017070190). Studies of any kind were included if they measured cancer patients' trust in online health information. Study quality was assessed using the Research Triangle Institute (RTI) item bank. A narrative synthesis was undertaken to examine the included studies.

RESULTS

Of the 7,314 citations obtained by the search, seven cross-sectional studies were included in the synthesis. A total of 1,054 patients reported having some or a great deal of trust in online cancer information; 154 patients reported moderately trusting such information; and 833 patients reported having no or little trust in online cancer information, internet websites as a source of cancer-related information or the internet as a medium of cancer-related information. Two of the seven studies reported between group comparisons for the above-stated patient characteristics. The methodological quality of the included studies was diverse.

CONCLUSION

The results of the included studies indicates that approximately half of cancer patients appear to trust cancer-specific online information, internet websites as a source of cancer-related information or the internet as an information medium. However, the small number of included studies, high heterogeneity of participants, methods and outcomes calls for further systematic research. It is important to understand that cancer patients do and will increasingly use trusted cancer information websites to search for information concerning their disease. Therefore, physicians and other health care providers should provide more support and advice to these patients.

摘要

背景

利用互联网满足信息需求在癌症患者中很普遍。患者对于是否依据所获取信息采取行动的决定很大程度上取决于信息及信息媒介的可信度。年龄较小、受教育程度较高的女性患者更有可能信任在线信息。本系统评价的目的是考察癌症患者对癌症相关在线信息、作为癌症相关信息来源的互联网网站或作为癌症信息媒介的互联网的信任程度。

方法

使用五个数据库进行系统评价(PROSPERO注册号:CRD42017070190)。如果研究测量了癌症患者对在线健康信息的信任度,则纳入任何类型的研究。使用三角研究机构(RTI)题库评估研究质量。对纳入研究进行叙述性综合分析。

结果

在检索获得的7314条文献中,七项横断面研究纳入了综合分析。共有1054名患者报告对在线癌症信息有一定或很大程度的信任;154名患者报告对这类信息中度信任;833名患者报告对在线癌症信息、作为癌症相关信息来源的互联网网站或作为癌症相关信息媒介的互联网没有或几乎没有信任。七项研究中有两项报告了上述患者特征的组间比较。纳入研究的方法学质量各不相同。

结论

纳入研究的结果表明,大约一半的癌症患者似乎信任特定癌症的在线信息、作为癌症相关信息来源的互联网网站或作为信息媒介的互联网。然而,纳入研究数量少、参与者、方法和结果的高度异质性需要进一步的系统研究。必须认识到,癌症患者确实并且将越来越多地使用受信任的癌症信息网站来搜索有关其疾病的信息。因此,医生和其他医疗保健提供者应向这些患者提供更多支持和建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6feb/6776066/c26401d3bf04/peerj-07-7634-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6feb/6776066/c26401d3bf04/peerj-07-7634-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6feb/6776066/c26401d3bf04/peerj-07-7634-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The extent to which cancer patients trust in cancer-related online information: a systematic review.癌症患者对癌症相关在线信息的信任程度:一项系统综述
PeerJ. 2019 Sep 30;7:e7634. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7634. eCollection 2019.
2
In whom do cancer survivors trust online and offline?癌症幸存者在网上和网下信任谁?
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(15):6171-6. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.15.6171.
3
Trusted online sources of health information: differences in demographics, health beliefs, and health-information orientation.可靠的在线健康信息来源:人口统计学、健康观念和健康信息取向的差异。
J Med Internet Res. 2003 Jul-Sep;5(3):e21. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5.3.e21. Epub 2003 Sep 25.
4
Can Patients Trust Online Health Information? A Meta-narrative Systematic Review Addressing the Quality of Health Information on the Internet.患者能信任网上的健康信息吗?一项针对互联网健康信息质量的元叙述系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Sep;34(9):1884-1891. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05109-0. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
5
The Impact of Individuals' Attitudes Toward Health Websites on Their Perceived Quality of Health Information: An Empirical Study.个体对健康网站的态度对其感知健康信息质量的影响:一项实证研究。
Telemed J E Health. 2019 Nov;25(11):1099-1107. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0217. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
6
Online health information-seeking behaviour of patients attending a primary care clinic in Malaysia: a cross-sectional study.马来西亚一家初级保健诊所患者的在线健康信息搜索行为:一项横断面研究。
Fam Pract. 2022 Jan 19;39(1):38-45. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab099.
7
Trusting Social Media as a Source of Health Information: Online Surveys Comparing the United States, Korea, and Hong Kong.将社交媒体作为健康信息来源的信任度:比较美国、韩国和中国香港地区的在线调查
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 14;18(3):e25. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4193.
8
Use of the internet as a health information resource among French young adults: results from a nationally representative survey.法国年轻人将互联网用作健康信息资源的情况:一项全国代表性调查的结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 May 13;16(5):e128. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2934.
9
Factors Associated With Perceived Trust of False Abortion Websites: Cross-sectional Online Survey.与感知虚假人工流产网站可信度相关的因素:横断面在线调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 19;23(4):e25323. doi: 10.2196/25323.
10
The Role of Trust When Adolescents Search for and Appraise Online Health Information.当青少年搜索和评估在线健康信息时,信任的作用。
J Pediatr. 2020 Jun;221:215-223.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.02.074.

引用本文的文献

1
Is This the Right Link? How TikTok Views Oncoplastic Breast Surgery.这是正确的链接吗?TikTok 对肿瘤整形乳房手术的看法。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jul 19. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17858-w.
2
Factors Associated With the Level of Trust in Health Information Robots Among the General Population From a Socioecological Model Perspective: Network Analysis.从社会生态模型视角看普通人群中与健康信息机器人信任水平相关的因素:网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 13;27:e68299. doi: 10.2196/68299.
3
The influences of acculturation strategies on physician trust among internal migrants in Shanghai, China: a cross-sectional study in 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
eHealth literacy, Internet and eHealth service usage: a survey among cancer patients and their relatives.电子健康素养、互联网及电子健康服务使用情况:一项针对癌症患者及其亲属的调查
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov;143(11):2291-2299. doi: 10.1007/s00432-017-2475-6. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
2
Trust and Credibility in Web-Based Health Information: A Review and Agenda for Future Research.基于网络的健康信息中的信任与可信度:综述及未来研究议程
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 19;19(6):e218. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7579.
3
Health-Related Internet Use in People With Cancer: Results From a Cross-Sectional Study in Two Outpatient Clinics in Sweden.
文化适应策略对中国上海外来务工人员医生信任度的影响:2021年横断面研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 23;13:1506520. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1506520. eCollection 2025.
4
Segmented assimilation trajectories of physician trust among internal migrants in Shanghai, China: A cross-sectional study.中国上海外来务工人员对医生信任度的分段同化轨迹:一项横断面研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 18;10(19):e37833. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37833. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
5
Evaluating the Efficacy of ChatGPT as a Patient Education Tool in Prostate Cancer: Multimetric Assessment.评估 ChatGPT 在前列腺癌患者教育中的疗效:多指标评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 14;26:e55939. doi: 10.2196/55939.
6
Talking with clinicians about online cancer information: a survey of cancer patients and surrogate information seekers.与临床医生讨论在线癌症信息:对癌症患者和替代信息寻求者的调查。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 May 17;32(6):362. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08578-0.
7
An examination of psychometric properties of study quality assessment scales in meta-analysis: Rasch measurement model applied to the firefighter cancer literature.元分析中研究质量评估量表的心理测量特性研究:应用于消防员癌症文献的 Rasch 测量模型。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 26;18(7):e0284469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284469. eCollection 2023.
8
Factors influencing the e-health literacy in cancer patients: a systematic review.影响癌症患者电子健康素养的因素:系统评价。
J Cancer Surviv. 2023 Apr;17(2):425-440. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01260-6. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
9
AYAs' online information and eHealth needs: A comparison with healthcare professionals' perceptions.AYAs 的在线信息和电子健康需求:与医疗保健专业人员认知的比较。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jan;12(2):2016-2026. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5048. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
10
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2022 Apr 1;32(2):294-302. doi: 10.5737/23688076322294302. eCollection 2022 Spring.
癌症患者中与健康相关的互联网使用情况:瑞典两家门诊诊所的横断面研究结果
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 15;19(5):e163. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6830.
4
Robotic Prostatectomy on the Web: A Cross-Sectional Qualitative Assessment.网络上的机器人前列腺切除术:一项横断面定性评估
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016 Aug;14(4):e355-62. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.12.020. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
5
Evaluating the quality of internet information for breast cancer.评估乳腺癌互联网信息的质量。
Breast. 2016 Feb;25:34-7. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
6
Internet Usage Trends in Thoracic Surgery Patients and Their Caregivers.胸外科患者及其护理人员的互联网使用趋势
J Cancer Educ. 2017 Mar;32(1):91-96. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0934-9.
7
Quality of online information to support patient decision-making in breast cancer surgery.支持乳腺癌手术患者决策的在线信息质量
J Surg Oncol. 2015 Nov;112(6):575-80. doi: 10.1002/jso.24046. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
8
Association of Actual and Preferred Decision Roles With Patient-Reported Quality of Care: Shared Decision Making in Cancer Care.实际和期望的决策角色与患者报告的护理质量的关联:癌症护理中的共同决策。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Apr;1(1):50-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.112.
9
What cancer patients find in the internet: the visibility of evidence-based patient information - analysis of information on German websites.癌症患者在互联网上找到的内容:基于证据的患者信息的可见性 - 对德国网站信息的分析。
Oncol Res Treat. 2015;38(5):212-8. doi: 10.1159/000381739. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
10
Cancer-Related Information Seeking Among Cancer Survivors: Trends Over a Decade (2003-2013).癌症幸存者中与癌症相关的信息寻求:十年(2003 - 2013年)趋势
J Cancer Educ. 2016 Jun;31(2):348-57. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0802-7.