• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Criminal Justice Contact Across Generations: Assessing the intergenerational Labeling Hypothesis.跨代刑事司法接触:评估代际标签假设
J Dev Life Course Criminol. 2019 Jun;5(2):137-175. doi: 10.1007/s40865-019-00118-3. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
2
Intergenerational Continuity and Discontinuity in Substance Use: The Role of Concurrent Parental Marijuana Use.物质使用中的代际连续性与不连续性:父母同时使用大麻的作用。
J Dev Life Course Criminol. 2021 Jun;7(2):127-150. doi: 10.1007/s40865-021-00159-7. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
3
Intergenerational Patterns in Offending: Lessons from the Rochester Intergenerational Study-ASC Division of Developmental and Life Course Criminology David P. Farrington Lecture, 2019.犯罪的代际模式:来自罗切斯特代际研究的经验教训——发展与生命历程犯罪学ASC部门大卫·P·法林顿讲座,2019年
J Dev Life Course Criminol. 2020 Dec;6(4):381-397. doi: 10.1007/s40865-020-00150-8. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
4
The Protective Effects of Family Support on the Relationship between Official Intervention and General Delinquency across the Life Course.家庭支持对一生中官方干预与一般犯罪行为之间关系的保护作用。
J Dev Life Course Criminol. 2017 Mar;3(1):39-61. doi: 10.1007/s40865-016-0051-4. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
5
Intergenerational Continuity in Substance Abuse: Does Offspring's Friendship Network Make a Difference?代际物质滥用的连续性:子女的友谊网络有影响吗?
J Adolesc Health. 2018 Aug;63(2):205-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.02.014.
6
Frequency and seriousness of parental offending and their impact on juvenile offending.父母犯罪的频率和严重程度及其对青少年犯罪的影响。
J Adolesc. 2009 Aug;32(4):893-908. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.10.005. Epub 2008 Nov 21.
7
Exploring Intergenerational Continuity in Gang Membership.探索帮派成员身份的代际延续性。
J Crime Justice. 2017;40(3):252-274. doi: 10.1080/0735648X.2017.1337556. Epub 2017 Jun 11.
8
Exploring Intergenerational Discontinuity in Problem Behavior: Bad Parents with Good Children.探索问题行为中的代际不连续性:不良父母与优秀子女
Youth Violence Juv Justice. 2015 Apr 1;13(2):99-122. doi: 10.1177/1541204014527119.
9
Stigma Arising from Youth Police Contact: The Protective Role of Mother-Youth Closeness.青少年与警方接触所产生的污名:母子亲密关系的保护作用。
J Marriage Fam. 2023 Apr;85(2):477-493. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12886. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
10
Intergenerational relations for drinking motives: invariant for same- and opposite-sex parent-child dyads?代际关系对饮酒动机的影响:在同性别和异性别父母-子女对子中是否一致?
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012 Jan;73(1):63-70. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2012.73.63.

引用本文的文献

1
Does Early Adolescent Arrest Alter the Developmental Course of Offending into Young Adulthood?青少年早期被捕会改变犯罪行为发展至青年期的进程吗?
J Youth Adolesc. 2022 Apr;51(4):724-745. doi: 10.1007/s10964-022-01576-7. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
2
An Exploratory Investigation of Parental Incarceration, Emotional Independence, and Adult Children's Criminal Activity.关于父母监禁、情感独立与成年子女犯罪活动的探索性调查。
J Dev Life Course Criminol. 2021 Jun;7(2):151-175. doi: 10.1007/s40865-021-00164-w. Epub 2021 May 20.
3
Validation of the Polish version of the Motivational Postures (Toward Taxes) Questionnaire.验证波兰版动机姿势(纳税倾向)问卷。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 15;16(6):e0252937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252937. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring Intergenerational Continuity in Gang Membership.探索帮派成员身份的代际延续性。
J Crime Justice. 2017;40(3):252-274. doi: 10.1080/0735648X.2017.1337556. Epub 2017 Jun 11.
2
The Protective Effects of Family Support on the Relationship between Official Intervention and General Delinquency across the Life Course.家庭支持对一生中官方干预与一般犯罪行为之间关系的保护作用。
J Dev Life Course Criminol. 2017 Mar;3(1):39-61. doi: 10.1007/s40865-016-0051-4. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
3
Seattle's Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD): Program effects on recidivism outcomes.西雅图执法协助转处计划(LEAD):该计划对累犯结果的影响。
Eval Program Plann. 2017 Oct;64:49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 May 10.
4
Labeling and intergenerational transmission of crime: The interaction between criminal justice intervention and a convicted parent.犯罪的标签与代际传递:刑事司法干预与被定罪父母之间的相互作用
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 8;12(3):e0172419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172419. eCollection 2017.
5
Demographic Patterns of Cumulative Arrest Prevalence By Ages 18 and 23.18岁和23岁时累计被捕率的人口统计学模式。
Crime Delinq. 2014 Apr;60(3):471-486. doi: 10.1177/0011128713514801.
6
The Apple Doesn't Fall Far from the Tree (or Does It?): Intergenerational Patterns of Antisocial Behavior-The American Society of Criminology 2008 Sutherland Address.有其父必有其子(果真如此吗?):反社会行为的代际模式——美国犯罪学学会2008年萨瑟兰演讲
Criminology. 2009 May;47(2):297-325. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00153.x.
7
The effects of police contact on trajectories of violence: a group-based, propensity score matching analysis.警察接触对暴力轨迹的影响:基于群组的倾向评分匹配分析。
J Interpers Violence. 2014 Feb;29(3):440-75. doi: 10.1177/0886260513505219. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
8
Growth in externalizing and internalizing problems in childhood: a prospective study of psychopathology across three generations.儿童期外化和内化问题的增长:三代人精神病理学的前瞻性研究。
Child Dev. 2012 Nov;83(6):1945-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01821.x. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
9
The effect of general and drug-specific family environments on comorbid and drug-specific problem behavior: a longitudinal examination.一般家庭环境和药物特异性家庭环境对共病和药物特异性问题行为的影响:纵向研究。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Jun;49(6):1151-64. doi: 10.1037/a0029309. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
10
Parental Incarceration during Childhood, Family Context, and Youth Problem Behavior across Adolescence.童年时期父母入狱、家庭环境与青少年整个青春期的问题行为
J Offender Rehabil. 2011 Jan 1;50(1):18-36. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2011.536720.

跨代刑事司法接触:评估代际标签假设

Criminal Justice Contact Across Generations: Assessing the intergenerational Labeling Hypothesis.

作者信息

Augustyn Megan Bears, Ward Jeffrey T, Krohn Marvin D, Dong Beidi

机构信息

Department of Criminal Justice, University of Texas at San Antonio, 4.220 Durango Building, 501 W. Cesar Chavez Blvd., San Antonio, TX 78207, USA.

Department of Criminal Justice, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Dev Life Course Criminol. 2019 Jun;5(2):137-175. doi: 10.1007/s40865-019-00118-3. Epub 2019 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1007/s40865-019-00118-3
PMID:31592428
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6779300/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The present study assesses the intergenerational labeling hypothesis and examines whether the relationship between a child's involuntary contact with the police and subsequent offending depends on parental arrest history (and its timing in the life course of the child) and parent sex.

METHODS

Using data from 312 parent-child dyads from the Rochester Youth Development Study and Rochester Intergenerational Study, generalized linear regression models estimate the main and interactive effects of a child's involuntary contact and parental arrest history on subsequent delinquency as well as potential mechanisms for deviance amplification.

RESULTS

Main effects are consistent with labeling theory and moderation analyses reveal that the impact of involuntary contact on subsequent delinquency depends on parental arrest history. More specifically, contact with the police on subsequent offending is greater when the focal parent has an arrest history, regardless of when the most recent arrest occurs in the life course of the child. However, some differences in the magnitude of the exacerbating effect of recent parental arrest emerged. Results also speak to potential mechanisms across mother-child and father-child dyads with respect to deviance amplification.

CONCLUSIONS

This research supports the life-course principles of "linked lives" and "timing in lives" and their application to labeling theory in an intergenerational context. To reduce deviance amplification, special attention should be paid to youth who experience a police contact in the context of a parental arrest history.

摘要

目的

本研究评估代际标签假设,并检验儿童非自愿与警方接触和随后犯罪之间的关系是否取决于父母的被捕历史(及其在孩子生命历程中的时间)以及父母的性别。

方法

利用来自罗切斯特青年发展研究和罗切斯特代际研究的312对亲子二元组数据,广义线性回归模型估计儿童非自愿接触和父母被捕历史对随后犯罪的主要和交互作用,以及偏差放大的潜在机制。

结果

主要效应与标签理论一致,调节分析表明非自愿接触对随后犯罪的影响取决于父母的被捕历史。更具体地说,当焦点父母有被捕历史时,与警方接触对随后犯罪的影响更大,无论最近一次被捕发生在孩子生命历程中的何时。然而,最近父母被捕的加剧效应在程度上存在一些差异。结果还说明了母子和父子二元组中偏差放大的潜在机制。

结论

本研究支持“关联生活”和“生命中的时机”的生命历程原则及其在代际背景下对标签理论的应用。为了减少偏差放大,应特别关注在父母有被捕历史的情况下与警方接触的青少年。