Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking (CATALYST), The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Mar 1;28(3):622-627. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa226.
Prior research on health information exchange (HIE) typically measured provider usage through surveys or they summarized the availability of HIE services in a healthcare organization. Few studies utilized user log files. Using HIE access log files, we measured HIE use in real-world clinical settings over a 7-year period (2011-2017). Use of HIE increased in inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department (ED) settings. Further, while extant literature has generally viewed the ED as the most relevant setting for HIE, the greatest change in HIE use was observed in the inpatient setting, followed by the ED setting and then the outpatient setting. Our findings suggest that in addition to federal incentives, the implementation of features that address barriers to access (eg, Single Sign On), as well as value-added services (eg, interoperability with external data sources), may be related to the growth in user-initiated HIE.
先前关于健康信息交换 (HIE) 的研究通常通过调查来衡量提供者的使用情况,或者总结医疗保健组织中 HIE 服务的可用性。很少有研究使用用户日志文件。我们使用 HIE 访问日志文件,在 7 年时间内(2011-2017 年)测量了现实临床环境中的 HIE 使用情况。HIE 在住院、门诊和急诊 (ED) 环境中的使用有所增加。此外,尽管现有文献通常将 ED 视为 HIE 最相关的环境,但在住院环境中观察到 HIE 使用的最大变化,其次是 ED 环境,然后是门诊环境。我们的研究结果表明,除了联邦激励措施外,实施解决访问障碍的功能(例如单点登录)以及增值服务(例如与外部数据源的互操作性)可能与用户发起的 HIE 增长有关。