Kampman Haleigh M, Rivera Rebecca L, Park Seho, Schaffer Jason T, Hancock Amy, Rahurkar Saurabh, Musey Paul, Kuhn Diane, Vest Joshua R, Schleyer Titus K
Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health - Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN.
Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2025 May 22;2024:581-589. eCollection 2024.
The aim of our study was to characterize emergency department clinicians' health information exchange (HIE) use patterns after the implementation of a Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) application. Using longitudinal electronic health record log data, we categorized HIE use behavior as: no HIE use (0), Web-based viewer use only (1), FHIR application use only (2), or Web-based viewer and FHIR application use (3). We sequenced HIE use behavior from September 2019 to February 2023, then employed hierarchical agglomerative clustering to identify clinician characteristics associated with each HIE use pattern. Our results showed four usage patterns representing (1) clinicians who "lagged" in HIE use and continued as sporadic HIE users (n=66, 46.1%), (2) "late adopters" who had more consistent usage over time (n=32, 22.4%), (3) "legacy users" whose preferred modality was the Web-based viewer (n=25, 17.5%), and (4) "mixed modality users" who displayed frequent changes in HIE access modality (n=20, 14.0%).
我们研究的目的是描述在实施快速医疗保健互操作性资源(FHIR)应用程序后急诊科临床医生的健康信息交换(HIE)使用模式。利用纵向电子健康记录日志数据,我们将HIE使用行为分类为:不使用HIE(0)、仅使用基于网络的查看器(1)、仅使用FHIR应用程序(2)或同时使用基于网络的查看器和FHIR应用程序(3)。我们对2019年9月至2023年2月期间的HIE使用行为进行了排序,然后采用层次凝聚聚类来确定与每种HIE使用模式相关的临床医生特征。我们的结果显示了四种使用模式,分别代表(1)在HIE使用方面“滞后”并持续为偶尔使用HIE的临床医生(n = 66,46.1%),(2)随着时间推移使用更一致的“晚期采用者”(n = 32,22.4%),(3)偏好基于网络的查看器的“传统用户”(n = 25,17.5%),以及(4)在HIE访问模式上频繁变化的“混合模式用户”(n = 20,14.0%)。