Departments of Pathology.
Urology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2020 Feb;44(2):191-197. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001384.
Postoperative biochemical recurrence occurs in up to 40% of prostate carcinoma patients treated with radical prostatectomy. Primary tumor grade and cribriform architecture are important parameters for clinical outcome; however, their relevance at positive surgical margins has not been completely elucidated yet. We reviewed 835 radical prostatectomy specimens and recorded pT-stage, surgical margin status, Grade Group, and cribriform architecture of the primary tumor and at positive surgical margins. Clinicopathologic parameters and biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) were used as endpoints. Positive surgical margins were present in 284 (34%) patients, with a median cumulative length of 5.0 mm. In 46%, the Grade Group at the margin was equal to the primary tumor grade, while being lower in 42% and higher in 12%. In multivariable analysis, Grade Group at the margin outperformed the Grade Group of the primary tumor in predicting BCRFS. Among primary Grade Group 2 patients, 56% had Grade Group 1 disease at the margin. Multivariable analysis identified cumulative length, Grade Group at the margin, and lymph node metastasis as independent predictors for BCRFS, while percentage Gleason pattern 4, tertiary Gleason pattern 5 of the primary tumor, and cribriform architecture at the margin were not. In conclusion, the Grade Group at the positive surgical margin was dissimilar to the primary tumor grade in 54% and better predicted BCRFS than the primary tumor grade. Cumulative length and tumor grade at the margin were independent predictors for BCRFS, whereas cribriform architecture at the margin was not.
术后生化复发发生在高达 40%接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗的前列腺癌患者中。原发肿瘤分级和筛状结构是临床结果的重要参数;然而,它们在阳性手术切缘的相关性尚未完全阐明。我们回顾了 835 例根治性前列腺切除术标本,记录了原发肿瘤和阳性手术切缘的 pT 分期、手术切缘状态、分级组和筛状结构。临床病理参数和生化无复发生存(BCRFS)用作终点。284 例(34%)患者存在阳性手术切缘,其累积长度中位数为 5.0mm。在 46%的病例中,边缘的分级组与原发肿瘤分级相等,而在 42%的病例中分级较低,在 12%的病例中分级较高。多变量分析表明,边缘的分级组在预测 BCRFS 方面优于原发肿瘤的分级组。在原发性 2 级组患者中,56%的患者边缘有 1 级疾病。多变量分析确定累积长度、边缘的分级组和淋巴结转移是 BCRFS 的独立预测因素,而原发性肿瘤的 Gleason 模式 4 百分比、三级 Gleason 模式 5 和边缘的筛状结构不是。总之,阳性手术切缘的分级组与原发肿瘤分级在 54%的病例中不同,并且比原发肿瘤分级更好地预测 BCRFS。累积长度和边缘的肿瘤分级是 BCRFS 的独立预测因素,而边缘的筛状结构则不是。