• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭背景与天赋II:科学领域的诺贝尔奖获得者

Family background and genius II: Nobel laureates in science.

作者信息

Rothenberg Albert

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachussetts, USA.

出版信息

Can J Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;50(14):918-25. doi: 10.1177/070674370505001406.

DOI:10.1177/070674370505001406
PMID:16494261
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In a previous study of literary creative achievement, we presented evidence refuting the still-influential statistical studies of Frances Galton on the inheritance of genius and also described a family background constellation of creativity. This study aims to assess empirically the hereditary transmission hypothesis with respect to creative achievement in the natural sciences.

METHODS

Family background data were collected on 435 of all 488 Nobel laureates in chemistry, physics, and medicine and physiology, from 1901 through 2003. These were compared with a matching group of 548 eminent nonscientists for incidence of occupational inheritance (that is, same parent-offspring occupations) and with 560 high-IQ nonprizewinners for predominant type of occupation.

RESULTS

The incidence of one or both parents having the same occupation was only 2% for science Nobel laureates but 20% for eminent nonscientists (P < 0.001). The predominant family background constellation (63%) for science Nobel laureates consisted of the same-sex parent either having a performance-equivalent occupation involving applied science, technology, or a natural-world focus and skills (P < 0.001, compared with the matching group) or having an unrelated occupation with unfulfilled scientific interests and wishes for creative expression.

CONCLUSIONS

Nobel laureates in the natural sciences do not manifest direct inheritance of creativity from their parents; instead, congruent-sex parents are predominantly in applied or performance-equivalent occupations, with unfulfilled creative and scientific wishes. Early developmental influences on motivation involving identification and competition with the congruent-sex parent are suggested.

摘要

目的

在先前一项关于文学创作成就的研究中,我们提供了证据,反驳了弗朗西斯·高尔顿(Frances Galton)关于天才遗传的仍具影响力的统计研究,并描述了创造力的家庭背景组合。本研究旨在通过实证评估自然科学领域创造性成就的遗传传递假说。

方法

收集了1901年至2003年期间488位化学、物理、医学和生理学诺贝尔奖获得者中435人的家庭背景数据。将这些数据与一组548位杰出非科学家的匹配组进行职业遗传发生率(即父母与子女职业相同)的比较,并与560位高智商非获奖者进行主要职业类型的比较。

结果

父母一方或双方从事相同职业的发生率,科学诺贝尔奖获得者仅为2%,而杰出非科学家为20%(P<0.001)。科学诺贝尔奖获得者的主要家庭背景组合(63%)包括同性父母一方从事涉及应用科学、技术或自然世界重点及技能的等效职业(与匹配组相比,P<0.001),或者从事与未实现的科学兴趣和创造性表达愿望无关的职业。

结论

自然科学领域的诺贝尔奖获得者并未表现出从父母那里直接继承创造力;相反,同性父母主要从事应用或等效职业,有着未实现的创造性和科学愿望。研究表明早期发展对动机的影响涉及与同性父母的认同和竞争。

相似文献

1
Family background and genius II: Nobel laureates in science.家庭背景与天赋II:科学领域的诺贝尔奖获得者
Can J Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;50(14):918-25. doi: 10.1177/070674370505001406.
2
Family background and genius.家庭背景与天赋。
Can J Psychiatry. 2004 Mar;49(3):185-91. doi: 10.1177/070674370404900306.
3
Why there should be more science Nobel prizes and laureates - And why proportionate credit should be awarded to institutions.为何应该设立更多诺贝尔科学奖奖项以及获奖者——以及为何应给予各机构相应的荣誉。
Med Hypotheses. 2007;68(3):471-3. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.11.003. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
4
Institutional environments and breakthroughs in science. Comparison of France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States.制度环境与科学突破:法国、德国、英国和美国的比较。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 30;15(9):e0239805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239805. eCollection 2020.
5
Reflections from Nobel laureates in chemistry.化学诺贝尔奖得主的反思。
Cell Chem Biol. 2024 Aug 15;31(8):1388-1390. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2024.07.016.
6
Give science and peace a chance: Speeches by Nobel laureates in the sciences, 1901-2018.给科学和和平一个机会:诺贝尔奖得主在科学领域的演讲,1901-2018 年。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 8;14(10):e0223505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223505. eCollection 2019.
7
[Commentary on the Nobel Prize that has been granted in Medicine-Physiology, Chemistry and Physics to noteable investigators].[关于授予杰出研究人员的诺贝尔医学-生理学奖、化学奖和物理学奖的评论]
Gac Med Mex. 2015 Mar-Apr;151(2):281-6.
8
[A message for young child neurologists: a lesson from the Nobel Prize centennial].[给年轻儿童神经科医生的一则信息:来自诺贝尔奖百年纪念的一课]
No To Hattatsu. 2004 Mar;36(2):106-13.
9
The Colombian scientific elite-Science mapping and a comparison with Nobel Prize laureates using a composite citation indicator.哥伦比亚科学界精英——科学图谱绘制与使用综合引文指标与诺贝尔奖得主的比较
PLoS One. 2022 May 26;17(5):e0269116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269116. eCollection 2022.
10
Nobel laureates in the history of the vitamins.历史上的维生素诺贝尔奖得主。
Ann Nutr Metab. 2012;61(3):265-9. doi: 10.1159/000343122. Epub 2012 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
What Makes a Nobel Prize Innovator? Early Growth Experiences and Personality Traits.是什么造就了诺贝尔奖得主式的创新者?早期成长经历和性格特质。
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 10;13:845164. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.845164. eCollection 2022.