Suppr超能文献

社区出诊医疗计划中评估项目的相关性:一项改良德尔菲研究的结果。

Relevance of assessment items in community paramedicine home visit programmes: results of a modified Delphi study.

机构信息

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Emergency Health Services, Prince Edward Island Department of Health and Wellness, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 11;11(11):e048504. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048504.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Guidelines for a structured assessment in community paramedicine home visit programmes have not been established and evidence to inform their creation is lacking. We sought to investigate the relevance of assessment items to the practice of community paramedics according to a pre-established clarity-utility matrix.

DESIGN

We designed a modified-Delphi study consisting of predetermined thresholds for achieving consensus, number of rounds of for scoring items, a defined meeting and discussion process, and a sample of participants that was purposefully representative.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We established a panel of 26 community paramedics representing 20 municipal paramedic services in Ontario, Canada. The sample represented a majority of paramedic services within the province that were operating a community paramedicine home visit programme.

MEASURES

Drawing from a bank of standardised assessment items grouped according to domains aligned with the International Classification on Functioning, Disability, and Health taxonomy, 64 previously pilot-tested assessment items were scored according to their clarity (being free from ambiguity and easy to understand) and utility (being valued in care planning or case management activities). Assessment items covered a broad range of health, social and environmental domains. To conclude scoring rounds, assessment items that did not achieve consensus for relevance to assessment practices were discussed among participants with opportunities to modify assessment items for subsequent rounds of scoring.

RESULTS

Resulting from the first round of scoring, 54 assessment items were identified as being relevant to assessment practices and 3 assessment items were removed from subsequent rounds. The remaining 7 assessment items were modified, with some parts removed from the final items that achieved consensus in the final rounds of scoring.

CONCLUSION

A broadly representative panel of community paramedics identified consensus for 61 assessment items that could be included in a structured, multidomain, assessment instrument for guiding practice in community paramedicine home visit programmes.

TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN58273216.

摘要

目的

社区急救员上门服务计划的结构化评估指南尚未建立,缺乏相关证据。我们试图根据预先确定的清晰-效用矩阵,调查评估项目与社区急救员实践的相关性。

设计

我们设计了一项改良的德尔菲研究,包括达成共识的预定阈值、评分项目的轮数、明确的会议和讨论过程以及有针对性的代表性样本。

设置和参与者

我们成立了一个由 26 名代表加拿大安大略省 20 个市立急救服务机构的社区急救员组成的小组。该样本代表了该省大部分正在开展社区急救员上门服务计划的急救服务机构。

措施

从根据与国际功能、残疾和健康分类法(ICF)分类相一致的领域分组的标准评估项目库中,对 64 项先前经过试点测试的评估项目进行了评分,以衡量其清晰度(避免歧义且易于理解)和实用性(在护理计划或病例管理活动中具有价值)。评估项目涵盖了广泛的健康、社会和环境领域。为了结束评分轮次,对于那些未达成共识认为与评估实践相关的评估项目,参与者之间将进行讨论,并为后续轮次的评分提供修改评估项目的机会。

结果

第一轮评分后,确定了 54 项与评估实践相关的评估项目,并从后续轮次中删除了 3 项评估项目。其余 7 项评估项目被修改,一些部分从最终项目中删除,这些项目在最后几轮评分中达成了共识。

结论

一个具有广泛代表性的社区急救员小组确定了共识,认为 61 项评估项目可以纳入社区急救员上门服务计划的结构化、多领域评估工具,以指导实践。

临床试验注册号

ISRCTN58273216。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fec5/8587454/5eade768af09/bmjopen-2020-048504f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验