Kinreich Sivan, Meyers Jacquelyn L, Maron-Katz Adi, Kamarajan Chella, Pandey Ashwini K, Chorlian David B, Zhang Jian, Pandey Gayathri, Subbie-Saenz de Viteri Stacey, Pitti Dan, Anokhin Andrey P, Bauer Lance, Hesselbrock Victor, Schuckit Marc A, Edenberg Howard J, Porjesz Bernice
Department of Psychiatry, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Mol Psychiatry. 2021 Apr;26(4):1133-1141. doi: 10.1038/s41380-019-0534-x. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
Predictive models have succeeded in distinguishing between individuals with Alcohol use Disorder (AUD) and controls. However, predictive models identifying who is prone to develop AUD and the biomarkers indicating a predisposition to AUD are still unclear. Our sample (n = 656) included offspring and non-offspring of European American (EA) and African American (AA) ancestry from the Collaborative Study of the Genetics of Alcoholism (COGA) who were recruited as early as age 12 and were unaffected at first assessment and reassessed years later as AUD (DSM-5) (n = 328) or unaffected (n = 328). Machine learning analysis was performed for 220 EEG measures, 149 alcohol-related single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from a recent large Genome-wide Association Study (GWAS) of alcohol use/misuse and two family history (mother DSM-5 AUD and father DSM-5 AUD) features using supervised, Linear Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier to test which features assessed before developing AUD predict those who go on to develop AUD. Age, gender, and ancestry stratified analyses were performed. Results indicate significant and higher accuracy rates for the AA compared with the EA prediction models and a higher model accuracy trend among females compared with males for both ancestries. Combined EEG and SNP features model outperformed models based on only EEG features or only SNP features for both EA and AA samples. This multidimensional superiority was confirmed in a follow-up analysis in the AA age groups (12-15, 16-19, 20-30) and EA age group (16-19). In both ancestry samples, the youngest age group achieved higher accuracy score than the two other older age groups. Maternal AUD increased the model's accuracy in both ancestries' samples. Several discriminative EEG measures and SNPs features were identified, including lower posterior gamma, higher slow wave connectivity (delta, theta, alpha), higher frontal gamma ratio, higher beta correlation in the parietal area, and 5 SNPs: rs4780836, rs2605140, rs11690265, rs692854, and rs13380649. Results highlight the significance of sampling uniformity followed by stratified (e.g., ancestry, gender, developmental period) analysis, and wider selection of features, to generate better prediction scores allowing a more accurate estimation of AUD development.
预测模型已成功区分患有酒精使用障碍(AUD)的个体和对照组。然而,识别哪些人容易患上AUD的预测模型以及表明AUD易感性的生物标志物仍不明确。我们的样本(n = 656)包括来自酒精中毒遗传学合作研究(COGA)的欧美裔(EA)和非裔美国人(AA)血统的后代和非后代,他们最早在12岁时被招募,首次评估时未受影响,数年后重新评估时被诊断为AUD(DSM-5)(n = 328)或未受影响(n = 328)。对220项脑电图测量、来自最近一项关于酒精使用/滥用的大型全基因组关联研究(GWAS)的149个与酒精相关的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)以及两个家族史特征(母亲DSM-5 AUD和父亲DSM-5 AUD)进行了机器学习分析,使用监督式线性支持向量机(SVM)分类器来测试在发展为AUD之前评估的哪些特征能够预测那些继续发展为AUD的人。进行了年龄、性别和血统分层分析。结果表明,与EA预测模型相比,AA的预测模型具有显著更高的准确率,并且在两个血统中,女性的模型准确率趋势高于男性。对于EA和AA样本,脑电图和SNP特征组合模型的表现优于仅基于脑电图特征或仅基于SNP特征的模型。在AA年龄组(12 - 15岁、16 - 19岁、20 - 30岁)和EA年龄组(16 - 19岁)的后续分析中证实了这种多维优势。在两个血统样本中,最年轻的年龄组比其他两个年龄组获得了更高的准确率得分。母亲患有AUD提高了两个血统样本中模型的准确率。识别出了几种有判别力的脑电图测量和SNP特征,包括较低的后部伽马波、较高的慢波连通性(δ波、θ波、α波)、较高的额叶伽马波比率、顶叶区域较高的β波相关性,以及5个SNP:rs4780836、rs2605140、rs11690265、rs692854和rs13380649。结果强调了抽样均匀性的重要性,随后进行分层(如血统、性别、发育阶段)分析以及更广泛地选择特征,以生成更好的预测分数,从而更准确地估计AUD的发展。