• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将阿尔茨海默病和痴呆患者的家庭护理人员纳入临床预约:确定潜在的最佳实践。

Integrating Family Caregivers of People With Alzheimer's Disease and Dementias into Clinical Appointments: Identifying Potential Best Practices.

机构信息

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Nov;39(11):1184-1194. doi: 10.1177/0733464819880449. Epub 2019 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1177/0733464819880449
PMID:31603041
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7454004/
Abstract

Family caregiver engagement in clinical encounters can promote relationship-centered care and optimize outcomes for people with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). Little is known, however, about effective ways for health care providers to engage family caregivers in clinical appointments to provide the highest quality care. We describe what caregivers of people with ADRD and people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) consider potential best practices for engaging caregivers as partners in clinical appointments. Seven online focus groups were convened. Three groups included spousal caregivers ( = 42), three included non-spousal caregivers ( = 36), and one included people with MCI ( = 15). Seven potential best practices were identified, including the following: "acknowledge caregivers' role and assess unmet needs and capacity to care" and "communicate directly with person with ADRD yet provide opportunities for caregivers to have separate interactions with providers." Participants outlined concrete steps for providers and health care systems to improve care delivery quality for people with ADRD.

摘要

家庭护理人员参与临床诊疗可以促进以关系为中心的护理,并优化阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症(ADRD)患者的治疗效果。然而,对于医疗服务提供者来说,很少有关于有效方法的知识来让家庭护理人员参与临床预约,以提供最高质量的护理。我们描述了患有 ADRD 和轻度认知障碍(MCI)的人的护理人员认为的潜在最佳实践,以将护理人员作为临床预约的合作伙伴。我们组织了七次在线焦点小组。三个小组包括配偶护理人员(=42),三个小组包括非配偶护理人员(=36),一个小组包括 MCI 患者(=15)。确定了七种潜在的最佳实践,包括以下内容:“承认护理人员的角色,评估未满足的需求和照顾能力”和“与 ADRD 患者直接沟通,但为护理人员提供与提供者进行单独互动的机会。”参与者为提供者和医疗保健系统概述了改善 ADRD 患者护理服务质量的具体步骤。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b74/7454004/f1fdebafed0f/nihms-1620909-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b74/7454004/f1fdebafed0f/nihms-1620909-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b74/7454004/f1fdebafed0f/nihms-1620909-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Integrating Family Caregivers of People With Alzheimer's Disease and Dementias into Clinical Appointments: Identifying Potential Best Practices.将阿尔茨海默病和痴呆患者的家庭护理人员纳入临床预约:确定潜在的最佳实践。
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Nov;39(11):1184-1194. doi: 10.1177/0733464819880449. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
2
Examining Online Behaviors of Adult-Child and Spousal Caregivers for People Living With Alzheimer Disease or Related Dementias: Comparative Study in an Open Online Community.探讨阿尔茨海默病或相关痴呆患者的成年子女和配偶照护者的在线行为:开放在线社区中的对比研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 17;25:e48193. doi: 10.2196/48193.
3
A Conceptual Model to Improve Care for Individuals with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias and Their Caregivers: Qualitative Findings in an Online Caregiver Forum.改善阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症患者及其照护者护理的概念模型:在线照护者论坛中的定性发现。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;81(4):1673-1684. doi: 10.3233/JAD-210167.
4
Transitional Care of People With Dementia and Caregivers in the ADRD-PC Trial: A Mixed Methods Study.ADRD-PC 试验中痴呆症患者和照料者的过渡护理:一项混合方法研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Nov;68(5):435-442. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.07.026. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
5
Views on Firearm Safety Among Caregivers of People With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias.照顾阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症患者的人群对枪支安全的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e207756. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7756.
6
Caregivers of Adults Living With Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia in 2020: A Secondary Analysis.2020 年阿尔茨海默病或痴呆症成人照护者:二次分析。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2022 Sep;48(9):15-25. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20220805-02. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
7
2022 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.2022 年阿尔茨海默病事实和数据。
Alzheimers Dement. 2022 Apr;18(4):700-789. doi: 10.1002/alz.12638. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
8
Direct and indirect cost of managing alzheimer's disease and related dementias in the United States.美国阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症管理的直接和间接成本。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Apr;17(2):189-202. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1313118.
9
Where are caregivers in the clinical trial? Evaluation of caregiver responsibilities in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias clinical trials.照护者在临床试验中扮演什么角色?对阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症临床试验中照护者职责的评估。
Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Nov;19(11):5316-5322. doi: 10.1002/alz.13418. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
10
Quality of Mobile Apps for Care Partners of People With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias: Mobile App Rating Scale Evaluation.用于阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆患者护理者的移动应用程序质量:移动应用程序评级量表评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Mar 29;10(3):e33863. doi: 10.2196/33863.

引用本文的文献

1
Bridging the Care Gap: Integrating Family Caregiver Partnerships into Healthcare Provider Education.弥合照护差距:将家庭照护者伙伴关系纳入医疗服务提供者教育
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 4;13(15):1899. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151899.
2
Managing medications among individuals with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: Patient-caregiver perspectives.管理轻度认知障碍和痴呆症个体的药物治疗:患者-照护者视角。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Oct;72(10):3011-3021. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19065. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
3
Chatting: Family Carers' Perspectives on Receiving Support from Dementia Crisis Teams.

本文引用的文献

1
Enhancing Empathy: a Role for Virtual Reality?增强同理心:虚拟现实能发挥作用吗?
Acad Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;42(6):747-752. doi: 10.1007/s40596-018-0995-2. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
2
Utilization of online focus groups to include mothers: A use-case design, reflection, and recommendations.利用在线焦点小组纳入母亲群体:一个用例设计、反思与建议
Digit Health. 2018 Jun 6;4:2055207618777675. doi: 10.1177/2055207618777675. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
3
The Theory of Dyadic Illness Management.双元疾病管理理论。
访谈:家庭照顾者对获得痴呆症危机应对小组支持的看法
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 30;12(11):1122. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12111122.
4
Triadic Communication in Medical Encounters Including Individuals With Dementia: A Scoping Review.包括痴呆症患者在内的医疗问诊中的三元沟通:一项范围综述
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2024;38(2):213-225. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000626. Epub 2024 May 30.
5
Goal Setting for Aging Adults and Care Partners: A Scoping Review.老年成年人及护理伙伴的目标设定:一项范围综述
Innov Aging. 2023 Dec 22;8(1):igad135. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igad135. eCollection 2024.
6
Persons living with dementia and caregivers' communication preferences for receiving a dementia diagnosis.痴呆症患者及护理人员对于接受痴呆症诊断的沟通偏好。
PEC Innov. 2024 Jan 11;4:100253. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100253. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Shared decision-making in persons living with dementia: A scoping review.痴呆患者的共同决策:范围综述。
Dementia (London). 2023 May;22(4):875-909. doi: 10.1177/14713012231156976. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
8
What Motivates Physicians to Address Caregiver Needs? The Role of Experiential Similarity.激励医生关注照护者需求的因素是什么?体验相似性的作用。
J Appl Gerontol. 2023 May;42(5):1003-1012. doi: 10.1177/07334648231151937. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
9
The role of care partners in medical visits of older adults with hearing loss and dementia: A national study.照顾者在老年听力损失和痴呆症患者就诊中的作用:一项全国性研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Mar;71(3):909-915. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18151. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
10
Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Among Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias.少数民族阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆患者对医疗保健提供者和系统的评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2233436. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33436.
J Fam Nurs. 2018 Feb;24(1):8-28. doi: 10.1177/1074840717745669. Epub 2018 Jan 20.
4
Sensitive Health Topics With Underserved Patient Populations: Methodological Considerations for Online Focus Group Discussions.服务不足患者群体的敏感健康话题:在线焦点小组讨论的方法学考虑。
Qual Health Res. 2018 Aug;28(10):1658-1673. doi: 10.1177/1049732317705355. Epub 2017 May 4.
5
The Support, Health, Activities, Resources, and Education program for early stage dementia: Results from a randomized controlled trial.早期痴呆症支持、健康、活动、资源与教育项目:一项随机对照试验的结果
Dementia (London). 2019 Aug;18(6):2122-2139. doi: 10.1177/1471301217743033. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
6
Virtual Versus In-Person Focus Groups: Comparison of Costs, Recruitment, and Participant Logistics.虚拟焦点小组与面对面焦点小组:成本、招募及参与者安排的比较
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Mar 22;19(3):e80. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6980.
7
Recognizing decision needs: first step for collaborative deliberation in dementia care networks.识别决策需求:痴呆症照护网络中协作审议的第一步。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jul;100(7):1329-1337. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.01.024. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
8
Inviting patients and care partners to read doctors' notes: OpenNotes and shared access to electronic medical records.邀请患者及其护理伙伴阅读医生记录:开放式病历与电子病历的共享访问。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e166-e172. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw108.
9
Managing Your Loved One's Health: Development of a New Care Management Measure for Dementia Family Caregivers.管理亲人健康:为痴呆症家庭照顾者开发新的护理管理措施。
J Appl Gerontol. 2018 May;37(5):620-643. doi: 10.1177/0733464816657472. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
10
Communication differences when patients and caregivers are seen separately or together.患者和护理人员分开就诊或一起就诊时的沟通差异。
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2015 Nov;21(11):557-63. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2015.21.11.557.