• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨阿尔茨海默病或相关痴呆患者的成年子女和配偶照护者的在线行为:开放在线社区中的对比研究。

Examining Online Behaviors of Adult-Child and Spousal Caregivers for People Living With Alzheimer Disease or Related Dementias: Comparative Study in an Open Online Community.

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 17;25:e48193. doi: 10.2196/48193.

DOI:10.2196/48193
PMID:37976095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10692884/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Alzheimer disease or related dementias (ADRD) are severe neurological disorders that impair the thinking and memory skills of older adults. Most persons living with dementia receive care at home from their family members or other unpaid informal caregivers; this results in significant mental, physical, and financial challenges for these caregivers. To combat these challenges, many informal ADRD caregivers seek social support in online environments. Although research examining online caregiving discussions is growing, few investigations have distinguished caregivers according to their kin relationships with persons living with dementias. Various studies have suggested that caregivers in different relationships experience distinct caregiving challenges and support needs.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to examine and compare the online behaviors of adult-child and spousal caregivers, the 2 largest groups of informal ADRD caregivers, in an open online community.

METHODS

We collected posts from ALZConnected, an online community managed by the Alzheimer's Association. To gain insights into online behaviors, we first applied structural topic modeling to identify topics and topic prevalence between adult-child and spousal caregivers. Next, we applied VADER (Valence Aware Dictionary for Sentiment Reasoning) and LIWC (Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count) to evaluate sentiment changes in the online posts over time for both types of caregivers. We further built machine learning models to distinguish the posts of each caregiver type and evaluated them in terms of precision, recall, F-score, and area under the precision-recall curve. Finally, we applied the best prediction model to compare the temporal trend of relationship-predicting capacities in posts between the 2 types of caregivers.

RESULTS

Our analysis showed that the number of posts from both types of caregivers followed a long-tailed distribution, indicating that most caregivers in this online community were infrequent users. In comparison with adult-child caregivers, spousal caregivers tended to be more active in the community, publishing more posts and engaging in discussions on a wider range of caregiving topics. Spousal caregivers also exhibited slower growth in positive emotional communication over time. The best machine learning model for predicting adult-child, spousal, or other caregivers achieved an area under the precision-recall curve of 81.3%. The subsequent trend analysis showed that it became more difficult to predict adult-child caregiver posts than spousal caregiver posts over time. This suggests that adult-child and spousal caregivers might gradually shift their discussions from questions that are more directly related to their own experiences and needs to questions that are more general and applicable to other types of caregivers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that it is important for researchers and community organizers to consider the heterogeneity of caregiving experiences and subsequent online behaviors among different types of caregivers when tailoring online peer support to meet the specific needs of each caregiver group.

摘要

背景

阿尔茨海默病或相关痴呆症(ADRD)是严重的神经退行性疾病,会损害老年人的思维和记忆能力。大多数痴呆症患者在家中接受家庭成员或其他无薪非正式照顾者的照顾;这给这些照顾者带来了巨大的精神、身体和经济挑战。为了应对这些挑战,许多非正式的 ADRD 照顾者在在线环境中寻求社会支持。尽管研究在线护理讨论的研究在不断增加,但很少有研究根据与痴呆症患者的亲属关系来区分照顾者。多项研究表明,不同关系的照顾者体验到不同的护理挑战和支持需求。

目的

本研究旨在考察和比较最大的两个非正式 ADRD 照顾者群体,即成年子女和配偶照顾者,在一个开放的在线社区中的在线行为。

方法

我们从阿尔茨海默病协会管理的在线社区 ALZConnected 中收集帖子。为了深入了解在线行为,我们首先应用结构主题建模来识别成年子女和配偶照顾者之间的主题和主题普遍性。接下来,我们应用 VADER(情感感知词典用于情感推理)和 LIWC(语言调查和词频)来评估两种类型的照顾者随时间在线帖子中的情绪变化。我们进一步构建了机器学习模型来区分每个照顾者类型的帖子,并根据精度、召回率、F 分数和精度-召回曲线下的面积来评估它们。最后,我们应用最佳预测模型来比较这两种类型的照顾者在帖子中预测关系能力的时间趋势。

结果

我们的分析表明,两种类型的照顾者的帖子数量都遵循长尾分布,这表明该在线社区的大多数照顾者都是不频繁的用户。与成年子女照顾者相比,配偶照顾者在社区中往往更活跃,发布的帖子更多,并且更广泛地参与了各种护理主题的讨论。配偶照顾者的积极情感沟通也随着时间的推移呈现出较慢的增长。用于预测成年子女、配偶或其他照顾者的最佳机器学习模型的精度-召回曲线下面积达到 81.3%。随后的趋势分析表明,随着时间的推移,预测成年子女照顾者帖子比预测配偶照顾者帖子变得更加困难。这表明成年子女和配偶照顾者可能会逐渐将他们的讨论从更直接与自己的经验和需求相关的问题转移到更普遍且适用于其他类型照顾者的问题。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,研究人员和社区组织者在根据每个照顾者群体的特定需求定制在线同伴支持时,考虑不同类型照顾者的照顾经验和随后的在线行为的异质性非常重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e83/10692884/8dbf831c619e/jmir_v25i1e48193_fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e83/10692884/3ab04ea48012/jmir_v25i1e48193_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e83/10692884/c298210fc397/jmir_v25i1e48193_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e83/10692884/724e7626eb46/jmir_v25i1e48193_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e83/10692884/21c441aa6213/jmir_v25i1e48193_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e83/10692884/c1dc32ba5381/jmir_v25i1e48193_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e83/10692884/5118d7858c8c/jmir_v25i1e48193_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e83/10692884/bee33e37fe4d/jmir_v25i1e48193_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e83/10692884/8dbf831c619e/jmir_v25i1e48193_fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e83/10692884/3ab04ea48012/jmir_v25i1e48193_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e83/10692884/c298210fc397/jmir_v25i1e48193_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e83/10692884/724e7626eb46/jmir_v25i1e48193_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e83/10692884/21c441aa6213/jmir_v25i1e48193_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e83/10692884/c1dc32ba5381/jmir_v25i1e48193_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e83/10692884/5118d7858c8c/jmir_v25i1e48193_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e83/10692884/bee33e37fe4d/jmir_v25i1e48193_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e83/10692884/8dbf831c619e/jmir_v25i1e48193_fig8.jpg

相似文献

1
Examining Online Behaviors of Adult-Child and Spousal Caregivers for People Living With Alzheimer Disease or Related Dementias: Comparative Study in an Open Online Community.探讨阿尔茨海默病或相关痴呆患者的成年子女和配偶照护者的在线行为:开放在线社区中的对比研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 17;25:e48193. doi: 10.2196/48193.
2
Diabetes-Related Topics in an Online Forum for Caregivers of Individuals Living With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias: Qualitative Inquiry.针对阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症患者照料者的在线论坛中与糖尿病相关的话题:定性调查
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 6;22(7):e17851. doi: 10.2196/17851.
3
A Conceptual Model to Improve Care for Individuals with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias and Their Caregivers: Qualitative Findings in an Online Caregiver Forum.改善阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症患者及其照护者护理的概念模型:在线照护者论坛中的定性发现。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;81(4):1673-1684. doi: 10.3233/JAD-210167.
4
Experiences of Alzheimer's disease and related dementia family caregivers on Reddit communities: A topic modeling and sentiment analysis.阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症家庭照护者在Reddit社区的经历:主题建模与情感分析
Artif Intell Health. 2024;1(3):127-135. doi: 10.36922/aih.3075. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
5
Family dynamics in dementia care: A phenomenological exploration of the experiences of family caregivers of relatives with dementia.痴呆症护理中的家庭动态:对痴呆症亲属的家庭照顾者的体验的现象学探索。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Dec;29(6):861-872. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12822. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
6
Perceptions and Utilization of Online Peer Support Among Informal Dementia Caregivers: Survey Study.非专业痴呆症照护者对在线同伴支持的认知和利用情况:调查研究。
JMIR Aging. 2024 May 31;7:e55169. doi: 10.2196/55169.
7
Social Media Discourse Related to Caregiving for Older Adults Living With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias: Computational and Qualitative Study.社交媒体论谈及老年痴呆症和相关痴呆症患者的照护:计算与定性研究。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Jun 19;7:e59294. doi: 10.2196/59294.
8
Online Support Groups for Family Caregivers: Scoping Review.在线支持小组为家庭照顾者:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 13;25:e46858. doi: 10.2196/46858.
9
Subjective burden among spousal and adult-child informal caregivers of older adults: results from a longitudinal cohort study.老年人配偶及成年子女非正式照料者的主观负担:一项纵向队列研究的结果
BMC Geriatr. 2016 Dec 7;16(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0387-y.
10
Effectiveness of interventions to improve family-staff relationships in the care of people with dementia in residential aged care: a systematic review protocol.改善老年护理机构中痴呆症患者护理中家庭与工作人员关系的干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):52-63. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2415.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility and Usability of a Web-Based Peer Support Network for Care Partners of People With Serious Illness (ConnectShareCare): Observational Study.针对重症患者护理伙伴的基于网络的同伴支持网络(ConnectShareCare)的可行性和可用性:观察性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 11;9:e70206. doi: 10.2196/70206.
2
Findings from a social media listening study on Chinese patients with Alzheimer's disease: a content analysis.一项针对中国阿尔茨海默病患者的社交媒体倾听研究结果:内容分析
Gen Psychiatr. 2025 Feb 25;38(1):e101794. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2024-101794. eCollection 2025.
3
Harnessing Social Media Data to Understand Information Needs About Kidney Diseases and Emotional Experiences With Disease Management: Topic and Sentiment Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
2023 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.2023 年阿尔茨海默病事实和数据。
Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Apr;19(4):1598-1695. doi: 10.1002/alz.13016. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
2
"We Moved Her Too Soon": Navigating Guilt Among Adult Child and Spousal Caregivers of Persons Living with Dementia Following a Move into Residential Long-Term Care.“我们转移她太早了”:痴呆症患者入住长期护理机构后,成年子女和配偶照顾者如何应对内疚感
Couple Family Psychol. 2022 Dec;11(4):300-314. doi: 10.1037/cfp0000150. Epub 2021 May 13.
3
"Please Don't Forget Us": A Descriptive Qualitative Study of Caregivers of Older Adults With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
利用社交媒体数据了解肾脏疾病的信息需求及疾病管理中的情感体验:主题与情感分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 25;27:e64838. doi: 10.2196/64838.
4
Sentiment Dynamics Among Informal Caregivers in Web-Based Alzheimer Communities: Systematic Analysis of Emotional Support and Interaction Patterns.基于网络的阿尔茨海默病社区中非正式照料者的情绪动态:情感支持与互动模式的系统分析
JMIR Aging. 2024 Dec 4;7:e60050. doi: 10.2196/60050.
《请不要忘记我们》:COVID-19 大流行期间,阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症老年患者照护者的描述性定性研究。
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2022 Sep-Oct;15(5):217-228. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20220829-01. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
4
Analysis of family stigma and socioeconomic factors impact among caregivers of patients with early- and late-onset Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia.分析早发性和晚发性阿尔茨海默病及额颞叶痴呆患者照料者的家庭耻辱感和社会经济因素影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 25;12(1):12663. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16400-2.
5
"Please Advise": Understanding the Needs of Informal Caregivers of People with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia from Online Communities Through a Structured Topic Modeling Approach.“请指教”:通过结构化主题建模方法了解阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆患者非正规照护者的需求。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2022 May 23;2022:149-158. eCollection 2022.
6
Alzheimer Caregiving Problems According to ADLs: Evidence from Facebook Support Groups.根据日常生活活动评估的阿尔茨海默病照料问题:来自 Facebook 支持小组的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 25;19(11):6423. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116423.
7
Exploring the Needs of Spousal, Adult Child, and Adult Sibling Informal Caregivers: A Mixed-Method Systematic Review.探索配偶、成年子女和成年兄弟姐妹等非正式照料者的需求:一项混合方法的系统评价
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 25;13:832974. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.832974. eCollection 2022.
8
Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.2019 年全球痴呆症患病率估计及 2050 年预测患病率:2019 年全球疾病负担研究分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Feb;7(2):e105-e125. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00249-8. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
9
Social Media Discussions Predict Mental Health Consultations on College Campuses.社交媒体讨论可预测大学校园的心理健康咨询。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 7;12(1):123. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03423-4.
10
Inferring the patient's age from implicit age clues in health forum posts.从健康论坛帖子中的隐含年龄线索推断患者年龄。
J Biomed Inform. 2022 Jan;125:103976. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103976. Epub 2021 Dec 11.