• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

组胺2受体拮抗剂、质子泵抑制剂或钾竞争性酸阻滞剂预防内镜黏膜下剥离术后迟发性出血的Meta分析

Histamine2-Receptor Antagonists, Proton Pump Inhibitors, or Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers Preventing Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Jiang Xin, Li Jiahao, Xie Jingmei, Liang Zhuoru, Wan Ning, Jiang Jie, Zhang Tiantian, Wu Yingyu

机构信息

School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.

College of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2019 Sep 19;10:1055. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01055. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2019.01055
PMID:31607912
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6761621/
Abstract

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was commonly used for en bloc resection in gastric cancer and adenoma with the risk of delayed bleeding after ESD. We conducted a direct and indirect comparison meta-analysis to evaluate the best choice in preventing post-ESD bleeding among proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine-receptor antagonists (HRAs), and the most widely used potassium-competitive acid blocker, vonoprazan. The Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched for randomized trials. We pooled odds ratios (OR) for preventing post-ESD bleeding using meta-analysis. Sixteen randomized trials met the inclusion criteria including 2,062 patients. Direct comparisons showed slightly significant efficacy in PPIs rather than HRAs in preventing post-ESD bleeding [OR: 1.83; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10 to 3.05] and vonoprazan was better than PPIs (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.86). The adjusted indirect comparison indicated vonoprazan was superior to HRAs (OR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.74). In subgroup analysis, PPIs had similar efficacy as HRAs in 4 weeks, while PPIs were better than HRAs in 8 weeks' treatment (OR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.08 to 3.40). The superiority of vonoprazan than PPIs was more significant in combination therapy (OR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.69). There was a significant difference in vonoprazan for 8 weeks of medication (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.92). The effects of vonoprazan is better than PPIs than HRAs in preventing bleeding after ESD. When vonoprazan combined with mucosal protective antiulcer drug in treatment or used in 8 weeks of medication, the efficacy may be even better.

摘要

内镜下黏膜剥离术(ESD)常用于胃癌和腺瘤的整块切除,但ESD术后有延迟出血的风险。我们进行了直接和间接比较的荟萃分析,以评估质子泵抑制剂(PPI)、组胺受体拮抗剂(HRA)以及使用最广泛的钾竞争性酸阻滞剂沃克奥美拉唑在预防ESD术后出血方面的最佳选择。我们在PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和Embase中检索了随机试验。我们使用荟萃分析汇总了预防ESD术后出血的比值比(OR)。16项随机试验符合纳入标准,包括2062例患者。直接比较显示,PPI在预防ESD术后出血方面比HRA略有显著疗效[OR:1.83;95%置信区间(CI):1.10至3.05],且沃克奥美拉唑优于PPI(OR:0.46;95%CI:0.25至0.86)。调整后的间接比较表明,沃克奥美拉唑优于HRA(OR:0.30,95%CI:0.12至0.74)。在亚组分析中,PPI在4周时与HRA疗效相似,而在8周治疗时PPI优于HRA(OR:1.91;95%CI:1.08至3.40)。沃克奥美拉唑在联合治疗中比PPI的优势更显著(OR:0.18;95%CI:0.04至0.69)。沃克奥美拉唑用药8周有显著差异(OR:0.44;95%CI:0.21至0.92)。在预防ESD术后出血方面,沃克奥美拉唑的效果优于PPI和HRA。当沃克奥美拉唑与黏膜保护抗溃疡药物联合治疗或用药8周时,疗效可能更好。

相似文献

1
Histamine2-Receptor Antagonists, Proton Pump Inhibitors, or Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers Preventing Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Meta-Analysis.组胺2受体拮抗剂、质子泵抑制剂或钾竞争性酸阻滞剂预防内镜黏膜下剥离术后迟发性出血的Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Sep 19;10:1055. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01055. eCollection 2019.
2
The efficacy of vonoprazan for management of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection ulcers compared with proton pump inhibitors: A meta-analysis.比较 vonoprazan 与质子泵抑制剂治疗内镜黏膜下剥离术后溃疡的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
J Dig Dis. 2019 Oct;20(10):503-511. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12813. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
3
Vonoprazan vs proton pump inhibitors in treating post-endoscopic submucosal dissection ulcers and preventing bleeding: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies.沃克酰胺与质子泵抑制剂治疗内镜黏膜下剥离术后溃疡及预防出血的比较:一项随机对照试验和观察性研究的荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(9):e19357. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019357.
4
Vonoprazan versus proton pump inhibitors for the management of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced artificial ulcer: A systematic review with meta-analysis.沃克替尼与质子泵抑制剂用于治疗胃内镜黏膜下剥离术后人工溃疡:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(24):e15860. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015860.
5
Comparison of vonoprazan and proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced ulcer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.比较 vonoprazan 和质子泵抑制剂治疗胃内镜黏膜下剥离术后溃疡:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 15;24(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03198-8.
6
Vonoprazan versus proton pump inhibitors in treating post-endoscopic submucosal dissection ulcers and preventing bleeding: Protocol for meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies.沃克(Vonoprazan)与质子泵抑制剂治疗内镜黏膜下剥离术后溃疡及预防出血的比较:随机对照试验和观察性研究的Meta分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(8):e14381. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014381.
7
Comparative efficacy of various anti-ulcer medications after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.各种抗溃疡药物在胃内镜黏膜下剥离术后的疗效比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):1271-1283. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6409-4. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
8
Efficacy of vonoprazan in prevention of bleeding from endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced gastric ulcers: a prospective randomized phase II study.vonoprazan 预防内镜黏膜下剥离术所致胃溃疡出血的疗效:一项前瞻性随机 II 期研究。
J Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb;54(2):122-130. doi: 10.1007/s00535-018-1487-6. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
9
Effect of proton pump inhibitors compared to histamine-2 receptor antagonists on bleeding management and wound healing after endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.与组胺-2受体拮抗剂相比,质子泵抑制剂对内镜黏膜切除术或内镜黏膜下剥离术后出血管理及伤口愈合的影响:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2024 Dec;33(12):1317-1327. doi: 10.17219/acem/176892.
10
Comparison of the Use of Vonoprazan and Proton Pump Inhibitors for the Treatment of Peptic Ulcers Resulting from Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗后消化性溃疡中使用 vonoprazan 与质子泵抑制剂的效果比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Feb 13;25:1169-1176. doi: 10.12659/MSM.911886.

引用本文的文献

1
Vonoprazan or Proton Pump Inhibitor for Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients Taking Antithrombotic Agents.沃克或质子泵抑制剂用于接受抗血栓药物治疗患者的胃内镜黏膜下剥离术
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Aug;40(8):1890-1898. doi: 10.1111/jgh.17027. Epub 2025 May 27.
2
Intermittent Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy in Low-Risk Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding May Be Significantly Cost-Saving.低风险非静脉曲张性上消化道出血的间歇性质子泵抑制剂治疗可能显著节省成本。
Medicines (Basel). 2023 Jul 20;10(7):44. doi: 10.3390/medicines10070044.
3
A narrative review of postoperative bleeding in patients with gastric cancer treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection.

本文引用的文献

1
A prospective randomized trial of a potassium competitive acid blocker vs proton pump inhibitors on the effect of ulcer healing after endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric neoplasia.一项关于钾竞争性酸阻滞剂与质子泵抑制剂对胃肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术后溃疡愈合效果影响的前瞻性随机试验。
J Int Med Res. 2019 Apr;47(4):1441-1452. doi: 10.1177/0300060519828514. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
2
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effects of Vonoprazan Plus Rebamipide and Esomeprazole Plus Rebamipide on Gastric Ulcer Healing Induced by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.比较沃克+瑞巴派特与埃索美拉唑+瑞巴派特对内镜下黏膜下剥离术后胃溃疡愈合影响的随机对照试验
Intern Med. 2019 Jan 15;58(2):159-166. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1146-18. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
3
关于接受内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗的胃癌患者术后出血的叙述性综述。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Feb;13(1):413-425. doi: 10.21037/jgo-21-466.
4
Early vs. Delayed Feeding after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.早期与延迟喂养在胃癌内镜黏膜下剥离术后的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Nov 27;56(12):653. doi: 10.3390/medicina56120653.
Vonoprazan versus proton-pump inhibitors for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.沃克索拉唑与质子泵抑制剂治疗胃内镜黏膜下剥离术后溃疡的系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Dec;30(12):1416-1421. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001204.
4
Efficacy of vonoprazan in prevention of bleeding from endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced gastric ulcers: a prospective randomized phase II study.vonoprazan 预防内镜黏膜下剥离术所致胃溃疡出血的疗效:一项前瞻性随机 II 期研究。
J Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb;54(2):122-130. doi: 10.1007/s00535-018-1487-6. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
5
Effects of Vonoprazan Compared with Esomeprazole on the Healing of Artificial Postendoscopic Submucosal Dissection Ulcers: A Prospective, Multicenter, Two-Arm, Randomized Controlled Trial.沃克帕唑与埃索美拉唑对人工内镜下黏膜剥离术后溃疡愈合的影响:一项前瞻性、多中心、双臂、随机对照试验。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2018 Feb 18;2018:1615092. doi: 10.1155/2018/1615092. eCollection 2018.
6
Comparison of the Effects of Vonoprazan and Lansoprazole for Treating Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection-Induced Artificial Ulcers.比较 Vonoprazan 与 Lansoprazole 治疗内镜黏膜下剥离术所致人工溃疡的效果。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Apr;63(4):974-981. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-4948-0. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
7
Vonoprazan is Superior to Rabeprazole for Healing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Induced Ulcers.Vonoprazan 优于雷贝拉唑,可治愈内镜黏膜下剥离术诱导的溃疡。
Digestion. 2018;97(2):170-176. doi: 10.1159/000485028. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
8
Short-term efficacy of potassium-competitive acid blocker following gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a propensity score analysis.胃内镜黏膜下剥离术后钾离子竞争性酸阻滞剂的短期疗效:一项倾向评分分析
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Feb;53(2):243-251. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1410569. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
9
Effect of vonoprazan on the treatment of artificial gastric ulcers after endoscopic submucosal dissection: Prospective randomized controlled trial.vonoprazan 对内镜黏膜下剥离术后人工溃疡治疗效果的影响:前瞻性随机对照试验。
Dig Endosc. 2017 Jul;29(5):576-583. doi: 10.1111/den.12857. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
10
Vonoprazan prevents bleeding from endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced gastric ulcers.沃克预防内镜黏膜下剥离术所致胃溃疡出血。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Sep;44(6):583-91. doi: 10.1111/apt.13747. Epub 2016 Jul 28.