Bispebjerg Hospital, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Parkinsons Dis. 2020;10(1):47-57. doi: 10.3233/JPD-191726.
Deterioration of working memory(WM) is a common cognitive deficit in Parkinson's disease (PD), and severely influences the ability to lead an independent life. Interventions which can delay the impact of WM deficits could positively impact the independence and quality of life of patients.
To evaluate effects of computer-based cognitive rehabilitation (CBCR) on WM in patients with PD.
Pubmed, Embase, Psycinfo and Cochrane Library were systematically searched. Authors of included studies were contacted to detect unpublished data or articles not found by database-search. Broad selection criteria were applied because literature was expected to be limited. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they investigated the effects of CBCR on WM in a sample consisting of at least 50% PD patients, or in which the results of PD patients could be isolated. Studies were further eligible for inclusion in a planned meta-analysis if the effects of the CBCR intervention could be isolated, the CBCR intervention was compared to active or passive control groups consisting solely of PD patients, and the WM outcome measure could be isolated.
Only six studies were included despite broad inclusion criteria. Study results were heterogeneous, and the risk of bias in study methodology was either unclear or high. Two studies were eligible for meta-analysis. A meta-analysis was not performed, because these studies used different measures of WM which were not rated as equally valid and reliable.
Existing literature is sparse and provides insufficient evidence to conclude if CBCR benefits WM in PD patients.
工作记忆(WM)的恶化是帕金森病(PD)患者常见的认知缺陷,严重影响了独立生活的能力。能够延缓 WM 缺陷影响的干预措施可能会对患者的独立性和生活质量产生积极影响。
评估基于计算机的认知康复(CBCR)对 PD 患者 WM 的影响。
系统检索了 Pubmed、Embase、Psycinfo 和 Cochrane Library。联系了纳入研究的作者,以发现未发表的数据或未通过数据库搜索找到的文章。由于预期文献有限,因此应用了广泛的选择标准。如果研究调查了 CBCR 对至少 50% PD 患者样本中 WM 的影响,或者可以分离出 PD 患者的结果,则研究符合纳入标准。如果可以分离出 CBCR 干预的效果、CBCR 干预与仅由 PD 患者组成的主动或被动对照组进行比较,并且可以分离 WM 结果测量,则研究进一步符合计划进行荟萃分析的纳入标准。
尽管纳入标准广泛,但仅纳入了六项研究。研究结果存在异质性,研究方法的偏倚风险要么不明确,要么很高。两项研究符合荟萃分析的条件。由于这些研究使用了不同的 WM 测量方法,这些方法被认为不具有同等的有效性和可靠性,因此未进行荟萃分析。
现有文献稀少,无法得出 CBCR 是否有益于 PD 患者 WM 的结论。