• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Effect of Large-Capacity Magazine Bans on High-Fatality Mass Shootings, 1990-2017.大容量弹匣禁令对 1990-2017 年高致命性大规模枪击事件的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Dec;109(12):1754-1761. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305311. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
2
Public Mass Shootings: Counterfactual Trend Analysis of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban.公共场所大规模枪击事件:联邦攻击性武器禁令的反事实趋势分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Sep 20;10:e62952. doi: 10.2196/62952.
3
Impact of Firearm Surveillance on Gun Control Policy: Regression Discontinuity Analysis.枪支监管对枪支控制政策的影响:回归不连续分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Apr 22;7(4):e26042. doi: 10.2196/26042.
4
Large-Capacity Magazine Bans Linked With Fewer Mass Shootings, Deaths.大容量弹匣禁令与大规模枪击事件及死亡人数减少有关。
JAMA. 2020 Jan 14;323(2):108-109. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.20457.
5
A Time-Series Analysis of Firearm Purchasing After Mass Shooting Events in the United States.美国大规模枪击事件后枪支购买的时间序列分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e191736. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1736.
6
The relation between state gun laws and the incidence and severity of mass public shootings in the United States, 1976-2018.美国 1976-2018 年州枪支法律与大规模公共枪击事件发生率和严重程度的关系。
Law Hum Behav. 2020 Oct;44(5):347-360. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000378.
7
Another Two Mass Shootings: Déjà Vu All Over Again.又发生两起大规模枪击事件:似曾相识的感觉再次袭来。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Jun;174(6):862-863. doi: 10.7326/M21-1505. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
8
State gun laws, gun ownership, and mass shootings in the US: cross sectional time series.美国的州级枪支法律、枪支拥有量和大规模枪击事件:横断面时间序列研究。
BMJ. 2019 Mar 6;364:l542. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l542.
9
Reaching critical mass on mass shootings.大规模枪击事件达到临界规模。
Lancet. 2019 Aug 17;394(10198):541. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31938-5.
10
Effect of mass shootings on gun sales-A 20-year perspective.大规模枪击事件对枪支销售的影响:20 年的视角。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Sep;87(3):531-540. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002399.

引用本文的文献

1
Public Mass Shootings: Counterfactual Trend Analysis of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban.公共场所大规模枪击事件:联邦攻击性武器禁令的反事实趋势分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Sep 20;10:e62952. doi: 10.2196/62952.
2
How firearm legislation impacts firearm mortality internationally: A scoping review.枪支立法如何在国际上影响枪支死亡率:一项范围综述。
Health Policy Open. 2024 Aug 17;7:100127. doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2024.100127. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.
3
The Views of Police Officers Toward Gun Legislation and Public Health Policies Driven by Firearm Safety Concerns.警察对枪支立法和公共卫生政策的看法,这些政策是由枪支安全问题驱动的。
J Community Health. 2024 Jun;49(3):415-428. doi: 10.1007/s10900-023-01302-9. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
4
Gun Control for Health: A Public Health of Consequence, December 2022.《健康的枪支管制:重大公共卫生问题》,2022年12月
Am J Public Health. 2022 Dec;112(12):1710-1712. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.307133.
5
The Perfect Gun Policy Study in a Not So Perfect Storm.在一场并非完美的风暴中的完美枪支政策研究。
Am J Public Health. 2022 Dec;112(12):1707-1709. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.307120. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
6
State firearm laws, gun ownership, and K-12 school shootings: Implications for school safety.州枪支法律、枪支拥有情况与中小学枪击事件:对校园安全的影响
J Sch Violence. 2022;21(2):132-146. doi: 10.1080/15388220.2021.2018332. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
7
The Revolution Will Be Hard to Evaluate: How Co-Occurring Policy Changes Affect Research on the Health Effects of Social Policies.《评估难:政策并存如何影响社会政策健康影响研究》
Epidemiol Rev. 2022 Jan 14;43(1):19-32. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxab009.
8
What to Do When Everything Happens at Once: Analytic Approaches to Estimate the Health Effects of Co-Occurring Social Policies.当一切同时发生时该怎么办:分析方法估计同时发生的社会政策对健康的影响。
Epidemiol Rev. 2022 Jan 14;43(1):33-47. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxab005.
9
Impact of Firearm Surveillance on Gun Control Policy: Regression Discontinuity Analysis.枪支监管对枪支控制政策的影响:回归不连续分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Apr 22;7(4):e26042. doi: 10.2196/26042.

本文引用的文献

1
State gun laws, gun ownership, and mass shootings in the US: cross sectional time series.美国的州级枪支法律、枪支拥有量和大规模枪击事件:横断面时间序列研究。
BMJ. 2019 Mar 6;364:l542. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l542.
2
How to Stop Mass Shootings.如何制止大规模枪击事件。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Sep 27;379(13):1193-1196. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1807277.
3
Public Support for Gun Violence Prevention Policies Among Gun Owners and Non-Gun Owners in 2017.2017 年枪支拥有者和非枪支拥有者对枪支暴力预防政策的公众支持
Am J Public Health. 2018 Jul;108(7):878-881. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304432. Epub 2018 May 17.
4
Rampage shootings: an historical, empirical, and theoretical overview.狂怒式枪击事件:历史、实证与理论综述。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2018 Feb;19:28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.025. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
5
Criminal Use of Assault Weapons and High-Capacity Semiautomatic Firearms: an Updated Examination of Local and National Sources.攻击性武器和大容量半自动枪支的犯罪使用:对地方和国家来源的最新审查。
J Urban Health. 2018 Jun;95(3):313-321. doi: 10.1007/s11524-017-0205-7.
6
Good news, bad news: An analysis of 11,294 gunshot wounds (GSWs) over two decades in a single center.好消息,坏消息:对一个中心二十多年来的11294例枪伤进行的分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Jan;84(1):58-65. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001635.
7
Unrelenting violence: an analysis of 6,322 gunshot wound patients at a Level I trauma center.无情的暴力:对一级创伤中心 6322 名枪伤患者的分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jan;76(1):2-9; discussion 9-11. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab19e7.
8
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.停电:为什么小样本量会破坏神经科学的可靠性。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 May;14(5):365-76. doi: 10.1038/nrn3475. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
9
Yankee Doodling: Guns don't kill crowds, people with semi-automatics do.扬基歌:枪不会杀死人群,使用半自动武器的人才会。 需要说明的是,该内容包含片面观点且可能会引起争议。枪支暴力是一个复杂的社会问题,不能简单地将责任完全归咎于某一方,而应该从多个角度,包括枪支管控政策、社会环境、心理健康等方面来综合看待和解决。
BMJ. 2011 Jan 25;342:d477. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d477.
10
Epidemiologic changes in gunshot wounds in Washington, DC, 1983-1990.1983 - 1990年华盛顿特区枪伤的流行病学变化
Arch Surg. 1992 Jun;127(6):694-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420060066010.

大容量弹匣禁令对 1990-2017 年高致命性大规模枪击事件的影响。

The Effect of Large-Capacity Magazine Bans on High-Fatality Mass Shootings, 1990-2017.

机构信息

Louis Klarevas is with the Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY. Andrew Conner is with the Frank H. Netter, MD, School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, North Haven, CT. David Hemenway is with the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2019 Dec;109(12):1754-1761. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305311. Epub 2019 Oct 17.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2019.305311
PMID:31622147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6836798/
Abstract

To evaluate the effect of large-capacity magazine (LCM) bans on the frequency and lethality of high-fatality mass shootings in the United States. We analyzed state panel data of high-fatality mass shootings from 1990 to 2017. We first assessed the relationship between LCM bans overall, and then federal and state bans separately, on (1) the occurrence of high-fatality mass shootings (logit regression) and (2) the deaths resulting from such incidents (negative binomial analysis). We controlled for 10 independent variables, used state fixed effects with a continuous variable for year, and accounted for clustering. Between 1990 and 2017, there were 69 high-fatality mass shootings. Attacks involving LCMs resulted in a 62% higher mean average death toll. The incidence of high-fatality mass shootings in non-LCM ban states was more than double the rate in LCM ban states; the annual number of deaths was more than 3 times higher. In multivariate analyses, states without an LCM ban experienced significantly more high-fatality mass shootings and a higher death rate from such incidents. LCM bans appear to reduce both the incidence of, and number of people killed in, high-fatality mass shootings.

摘要

评估大容量弹匣(LCM)禁令对美国高致命性大规模枪击事件的频率和致命性的影响。我们分析了 1990 年至 2017 年高致命性大规模枪击事件的州面板数据。我们首先评估了 LCM 禁令整体,以及联邦和州禁令分别对(1)高致命性大规模枪击事件的发生(逻辑回归)和(2)此类事件造成的死亡人数(负二项式分析)的关系。我们控制了 10 个独立变量,使用连续变量的州固定效应,并考虑了聚类。在 1990 年至 2017 年期间,发生了 69 起高致命性大规模枪击事件。涉及 LCM 的袭击导致平均死亡人数增加了 62%。非 LCM 禁令州的高致命性大规模枪击事件发生率是 LCM 禁令州的两倍多;每年的死亡人数高出 3 倍多。在多变量分析中,没有 LCM 禁令的州经历了更多的高致命性大规模枪击事件,此类事件的死亡率也更高。LCM 禁令似乎减少了高致命性大规模枪击事件的发生频率和死亡人数。