Hépatologie et réanimation hépato-digestive, Hôpital Beaujon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, France.
Département d'Epidémiologie Biostatistique et Recherche Clinique, Hôpital Bichat, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; INSERM CIC-EC 1425, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France; Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France.
J Hepatol. 2020 Mar;72(3):463-471. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Whether non-selective beta blockers (NSBBs) are deleterious in patients with end-stage cirrhosis and refractory ascites has been widely debated. We hypothesized that only the subset of patients on the liver transplant waiting list who had impaired cardiac performance would be at increased risk of mortality if receiving NSBBs.
This study included 584 consecutive patients with cirrhosis evaluated for transplantation between 1999 and 2014. All patients had right heart catheterization with hemodynamic measurements at evaluation. Fifty percent received NSBBs. Refractory ascites was present in 33%. Cardiac performance was assessed by left ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI). Waiting list mortality without liver transplantation was explored using competing risk analysis.
LVSWI was significantly lower in patients with refractory ascites. In multivariate analysis using competing risk, refractory ascites, NSBBs and LVSWI were associated with waiting list mortality in the whole population, with a statistically significant interaction between NSBBs and LVSWI. The most discriminant value of LVSWI was 64.1 g-m/m. In the final model, refractory ascites (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.52; 95% CI1.01-2.28; p = 0.0083) and treatment by NSBBs with LVSWI <64.1 g-m/m (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.96; 95% CI 1.32-2.90; p = 0.0009) were significantly associated with waiting list mortality, taking into account serum sodium and the model for end-stage liver disease score.
This study suggests that compromised cardiac performance is more common in patients with refractory ascites and that NSBBs are deleterious in cirrhotic patients with compromised cardiac performance. These results highlight the prognostic value of cardiac function in patients with end-stage cirrhosis.
There are still controversies concerning the impact of non-selective beta blockers on outcomes in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, especially in those with refractory ascites. In this study of 584 cirrhotic patients evaluated for liver transplantation, who underwent right heart catheterization, we have shown that global cardiac performance measured by left ventricular stroke work index is lower in patients with refractory ascites. Administration of non-selective beta blockers in patients with compromised cardiac performance may increase waiting list mortality. These results highlight the prognostic value of global cardiac performance in patients with end-stage cirrhosis.
非选择性β受体阻滞剂(NSBBs)是否对终末期肝硬化伴难治性腹水患者有害,这一问题一直存在广泛争议。我们假设,只有在等待肝移植的患者亚组中,如果存在心功能受损,那么接受 NSBB 治疗的患者死亡风险才会增加。
本研究纳入了 1999 年至 2014 年期间接受评估的 584 例连续肝硬化患者。所有患者在评估时均接受了右心导管检查和血流动力学测量。其中 50%的患者接受了 NSBB 治疗。33%的患者存在难治性腹水。左心室每搏功指数(LVSWI)用于评估心功能。采用竞争风险分析探讨无肝移植的等待名单死亡率。
难治性腹水患者的 LVSWI 明显较低。多变量竞争风险分析显示,难治性腹水、NSBB 和 LVSWI 与全人群的等待名单死亡率相关,NSBB 和 LVSWI 之间存在统计学显著的交互作用。LVSWI 的最佳临界值为 64.1 g-m/m。在最终模型中,难治性腹水(亚分布风险比 1.52;95%CI1.01-2.28;p=0.0083)和 LVSWI<64.1 g-m/m 时接受 NSBB 治疗(亚分布风险比 1.96;95%CI 1.32-2.90;p=0.0009)与等待名单死亡率显著相关,同时考虑了血清钠和终末期肝病模型评分。
本研究表明,难治性腹水患者心功能更易受损,而 NSBB 在存在心功能受损的肝硬化患者中是有害的。这些结果突出了心功能在终末期肝硬化患者中的预后价值。
说明:这段文本的内容较为复杂,包含较多医学术语。在翻译过程中,我尽量保留了文本的原意和专业性。