• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

这是给你的:协作互动中近端与远端空间的社会调节。

This is for you: Social modulations of proximal vs. distal space in collaborative interaction.

机构信息

Department of Linguistics, Cognitive Science and Semiotics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Interacting Minds Centre, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 18;9(1):14967. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51134-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-51134-8
PMID:31628367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6802403/
Abstract

Human spatial representations are shaped by affordances for action offered by the environment. A prototypical example is the organization of space into peripersonal (within reach) and extrapersonal (outside reach) regions, mirrored by proximal (this/here) and distal (that/there) linguistic expressions. The peri-/extrapersonal distinction has been widely investigated in individual contexts, but little is known about how spatial representations are modulated by interaction with other people. Is near/far coding of space dynamically adapted to the position of a partner when space, objects, and action goals are shared? Over two preregistered experiments based on a novel interactive paradigm, we show that, in individual and social contexts involving no direct collaboration, linguistic coding of locations as proximal or distal depends on their distance from the speaker's hand. In contrast, in the context of collaborative interactions involving turn-taking and role reversal, proximal space is shifted towards the partner, and linguistic coding of near space ('this' / 'here') is remapped onto the partner's action space.

摘要

人类的空间表征是由环境提供的行动可能性塑造的。一个典型的例子是将空间组织为近体(可触及的)和远体(不可及的)区域,这与近端(这个/这里)和远端(那个/那里)的语言表达相对应。近/远体区分已在个体情境中得到广泛研究,但对于空间表征如何受到与他人互动的影响知之甚少。当空间、物体和动作目标共享时,空间的近/远编码是否会根据伙伴的位置进行动态调整?在两个基于新颖交互范式的预先注册实验中,我们表明,在不涉及直接协作的个体和社交情境中,语言对位置的近端或远端编码取决于它们与说话者手的距离。相比之下,在涉及轮流和角色转换的协作互动情境中,近端空间会向伙伴移动,近空间(“这个”/“这里”)的语言编码会重新映射到伙伴的动作空间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce2/6802403/f2dccc1ffa70/41598_2019_51134_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce2/6802403/87e03d88dc66/41598_2019_51134_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce2/6802403/5699080f3815/41598_2019_51134_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce2/6802403/614100d17151/41598_2019_51134_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce2/6802403/648c3078a2a6/41598_2019_51134_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce2/6802403/5e79b9e18fdf/41598_2019_51134_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce2/6802403/bef2ce599973/41598_2019_51134_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce2/6802403/07ea20cc1794/41598_2019_51134_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce2/6802403/18e1908bb824/41598_2019_51134_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce2/6802403/2495f73f6798/41598_2019_51134_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce2/6802403/f2dccc1ffa70/41598_2019_51134_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce2/6802403/87e03d88dc66/41598_2019_51134_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce2/6802403/5699080f3815/41598_2019_51134_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce2/6802403/614100d17151/41598_2019_51134_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce2/6802403/648c3078a2a6/41598_2019_51134_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce2/6802403/5e79b9e18fdf/41598_2019_51134_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce2/6802403/bef2ce599973/41598_2019_51134_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce2/6802403/07ea20cc1794/41598_2019_51134_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce2/6802403/18e1908bb824/41598_2019_51134_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce2/6802403/2495f73f6798/41598_2019_51134_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce2/6802403/f2dccc1ffa70/41598_2019_51134_Fig10_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
This is for you: Social modulations of proximal vs. distal space in collaborative interaction.这是给你的:协作互动中近端与远端空间的社会调节。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 18;9(1):14967. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51134-8.
2
Spatial demonstratives and perceptual space: To reach or not to reach?空间指示词与感知空间:伸手可及还是遥不可及?
Cognition. 2019 Oct;191:103989. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.06.001. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
3
Visual search patterns in neglect: comparison of peripersonal and extrapersonal space.忽视症中的视觉搜索模式:个人周边空间与个人外部空间的比较。
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Feb;47(3):869-78. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.020. Epub 2008 Dec 30.
4
Neural bases of personal and extrapersonal neglect in humans.人类个人及空间忽视的神经基础。
Brain. 2007 Feb;130(Pt 2):431-41. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl265. Epub 2006 Sep 28.
5
Manipulating time and space: Collision prediction in peripersonal and extrapersonal space.操控时间与空间:个人周边空间和个人外部空间中的碰撞预测
Cognition. 2017 Sep;166:107-117. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.024. Epub 2017 May 26.
6
"Near" and "far" in language and perception.语言与认知中的“近”和“远”
Cognition. 1999 Nov 9;73(1):35-63. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00040-2.
7
Gradients of detection in neglect: comparison of peripersonal and extrapersonal space.忽视症中的检测梯度:个人周边空间与个人外部空间的比较
Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(3):346-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.08.008.
8
Effects of prismatic adaptation on judgements of spatial extent in peripersonal and extrapersonal space.棱镜适应对个人周边空间和个人外部空间中空间范围判断的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(4):493-503. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00090-8.
9
Close interpersonal proximity modulates visuomotor processing of object affordances in shared, social space.在共享的社会空间中,亲密的人际距离会调节对物体可供性的视觉运动加工。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Jan;80(1):54-68. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1413-7.
10
Social scaling of extrapersonal space: target objects are judged as closer when the reference frame is a human agent with available movement potentialities.个人空间之外的社会尺度:当参照系是具有潜在移动能力的人类主体时,目标物体被判断为更近。
Cognition. 2015 Jan;134:50-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatial communication systems across languages reflect universal action constraints.跨语言的空间通讯系统反映了普遍的动作约束。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Dec;7(12):2099-2110. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01697-4. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
2
Learning others is good, others is better: the role of social interaction in human acquisition of new knowledge.向他人学习是好的,向他人学习更好:社会互动在人类获取新知识中的作用。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Feb 13;378(1870):20210357. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0357. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
3
Effects of Scale on Multimodal Deixis: Evidence From Quiahije Chatino.

本文引用的文献

1
This shoe, that tiger: Semantic properties reflecting manual affordances of the referent modulate demonstrative use.这只鞋,那只老虎:反映所指对象手动可及性的语义属性调节指示词的使用。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 7;14(1):e0210333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210333. eCollection 2019.
2
The body talks: Sensorimotor communication and its brain and kinematic signatures.身体的语言:感觉运动通讯及其大脑和运动学特征。
Phys Life Rev. 2019 Mar;28:1-21. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2018.06.014. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
3
Social perception of others shapes one's own multisensory peripersonal space.
规模对多模态指示语的影响:来自基亚希耶·查蒂诺语的证据
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 12;11:584231. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584231. eCollection 2020.
4
Demonstratives in Spatial Language and Social Interaction: An Interdisciplinary Review.空间语言与社会互动中的指示语:跨学科综述
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 25;11:555265. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.555265. eCollection 2020.
5
A conceptual framework for the study of demonstrative reference.指示参照研究的概念框架。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Apr;28(2):409-433. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01822-8. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
6
Demonstrative Reference and Semantic Space: A Large-Scale Demonstrative Choice Task Study.指示性参照与语义空间:一项大规模指示性选择任务研究。
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 7;11:629. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00629. eCollection 2020.
他人的社会感知塑造了自身的多感觉近体空间。
Cortex. 2018 Jul;104:163-179. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.08.033. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
4
Autistic traits affect interpersonal motor coordination by modulating strategic use of role-based behavior.自闭症特质通过调节基于角色行为的策略性使用来影响人际运动协调。
Mol Autism. 2017 Jun 9;8:23. doi: 10.1186/s13229-017-0141-0. eCollection 2017.
5
Joint Action: Mental Representations, Shared Information and General Mechanisms for Coordinating with Others.联合行动:心理表征、共享信息与与他人协调的一般机制
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 4;7:2039. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02039. eCollection 2016.
6
Language and memory for object location.语言与物体位置记忆。
Cognition. 2016 Aug;153:99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.04.016. Epub 2016 May 11.
7
A heart for interaction: Shared physiological dynamics and behavioral coordination in a collective, creative construction task.互动之心:集体创造性构建任务中的共享生理动态与行为协调
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Sep;42(9):1297-310. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000207. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
8
This and That Revisited: A Social and Multimodal Approach to Spatial Demonstratives.再探“这个”与“那个”:一种关于空间指示语的社会及多模态研究方法
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 16;7:222. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00222. eCollection 2016.
9
Investigating Conversational Dynamics: Interactive Alignment, Interpersonal Synergy, and Collective Task Performance.探究对话动态:互动对齐、人际协同与集体任务表现
Cogn Sci. 2016 Jan;40(1):145-71. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12251. Epub 2015 May 19.
10
Electrophysiological evidence for the role of shared space in online comprehension of spatial demonstratives.共享空间在空间指示语在线理解中作用的电生理证据。
Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:64-84. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.010. Epub 2014 Dec 6.