• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

静脉注射环磷酰胺脉冲治疗是治疗早期系统性硬皮病患者皮肤纤维化的有效方法。

Treatment with cyclophosphamide i.v. pulse therapy is an option for effective treatment of skin fibrosis in patients with early systemic sclerosis.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatic Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center.

Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Jul 1;59(7):1550-1555. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez487.

DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/kez487
PMID:31628802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7310100/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

SSc is a autoimmune disease characterized by fibrosis of the skin and internal organs. There is a lack of evidence for the efficacy of i.v. CYC pulse therapy on skin thickening. We aimed to examine the response of i.v. CYC pulse therapy on skin thickening in our cohort of SSc patients and analysed factors that predict this response.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the data for 143 patients with SSc from baseline to 12, 24 and 36 months. All patients were treated with at least 6 i.v. CYC pulses (750 mg/m2/month). We applied the modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) to assess skin thickening. A clinically relevant response was defined as a decrease in mRSS of 5 points and 25% from baseline. Different baseline variables for predicting response on month 12 were tested in logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics of the patients with dcSSc and lcSSc were collected. Forty-three percent (n = 42) of dcSSc patients had a clinically relevant response on month 12. Non-responding on month 6 predicts non-response on month 12 (odds ratio 37.1; 95% CI 4.5, 306.4).

CONCLUSION

We concluded that i.v. CYC pulse therapy should be considered as an effective treatment option for skin thickening in dcSSc patients, because 43% of this group of patients were found to have a clinically relevant response. Of the dcSSC patients who did not respond by month 6, only 29% had a response by month 12. This finding can help the physician and patient in shared decision making about whether or not to continue therapy.

摘要

目的

硬皮病是一种自身免疫性疾病,其特征是皮肤和内部器官纤维化。静脉注射环磷酰胺脉冲疗法对皮肤增厚的疗效缺乏证据。我们旨在检查我们的硬皮病患者队列中静脉注射环磷酰胺脉冲疗法对皮肤增厚的反应,并分析预测这种反应的因素。

方法

我们回顾性评估了 143 例硬皮病患者从基线到 12、24 和 36 个月的数据。所有患者均接受至少 6 个静脉注射环磷酰胺脉冲(750mg/m2/月)治疗。我们应用改良罗德纳皮肤评分(mRSS)评估皮肤增厚。临床相关反应定义为 mRSS 从基线下降 5 分和 25%。在逻辑回归分析中测试了不同的基线变量来预测 12 个月时的反应。

结果

收集了局限性硬皮病和弥漫性硬皮病患者的基线特征。43%(n=42)的局限性硬皮病患者在 12 个月时有临床相关反应。6 个月时无反应预测 12 个月时无反应(优势比 37.1;95%置信区间 4.5,306.4)。

结论

我们得出结论,静脉注射环磷酰胺脉冲疗法应被视为硬皮病患者皮肤增厚的有效治疗选择,因为 43%的此类患者有临床相关反应。在 6 个月时无反应的局限性硬皮病患者中,只有 29%在 12 个月时有反应。这一发现可以帮助医生和患者共同决策是否继续治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0918/7310100/6d2b7a6e8cc9/kez487f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0918/7310100/6d2b7a6e8cc9/kez487f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0918/7310100/6d2b7a6e8cc9/kez487f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Treatment with cyclophosphamide i.v. pulse therapy is an option for effective treatment of skin fibrosis in patients with early systemic sclerosis.静脉注射环磷酰胺脉冲治疗是治疗早期系统性硬皮病患者皮肤纤维化的有效方法。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Jul 1;59(7):1550-1555. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez487.
2
Long-term follow-up of patients with scleroderma interstitial lung disease treated with intravenous cyclophosphamide pulse therapy: a single-center experience.接受静脉注射环磷酰胺脉冲疗法治疗的硬皮病间质性肺疾病患者的长期随访:单中心经验
Isr Med Assoc J. 2015 Mar;17(3):150-6.
3
Predicting treatment outcomes and responder subsets in scleroderma-related interstitial lung disease.预测硬皮病相关间质性肺疾病的治疗结果和反应亚组。
Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Sep;63(9):2797-808. doi: 10.1002/art.30438.
4
Rituximab therapy is more effective than cyclophosphamide therapy for Japanese patients with anti-topoisomerase I-positive systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease.利妥昔单抗治疗比环磷酰胺治疗更有效用于日本抗拓扑异构酶 I 阳性系统性硬皮病相关间质性肺病患者。
J Dermatol. 2019 Nov;46(11):1006-1013. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.15079. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
5
Outcome of pulse oral cyclophosphamide therapy in scleroderma interstitial lung disease.脉冲式口服环磷酰胺治疗硬皮病间质性肺病的疗效
Clin Rheumatol. 2021 Jan;40(1):205-211. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05217-x. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
6
Cyclophosphamide versus mycophenolate mofetil in scleroderma interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) as induction therapy: a single-centre, retrospective analysis.环磷酰胺与霉酚酸酯用于硬皮病间质性肺病(SSc-ILD)诱导治疗的单中心回顾性分析
Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 Jun 2;18(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-1015-0.
7
Prediction of therapeutic response before and during i.v. cyclophosphamide pulse therapy for interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis: A longitudinal observational study.系统性硬皮病间质性肺病患者静脉环磷酰胺冲击治疗前和治疗期间治疗反应的预测:一项纵向观察性研究。
J Dermatol. 2018 Dec;45(12):1425-1433. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.14669. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
8
Efficacy of Mycophenolate Mofetil and Oral Cyclophosphamide on Skin Thickness: Post Hoc Analyses From Two Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials.霉酚酸酯和口服环磷酰胺对皮肤厚度的疗效:两项随机安慰剂对照试验的事后分析。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Mar;70(3):439-444. doi: 10.1002/acr.23282. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
9
Low-dose pulse cyclophosphamide in interstitial lung disease associated with systemic sclerosis (SSc-ILD): efficacy of maintenance immunosuppression in responders and non-responders.低剂量脉冲环磷酰胺治疗系统性硬化症相关间质性肺病(SSc-ILD):应答者和无应答者维持免疫抑制的疗效。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015 Feb;44(4):437-44. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
10
Autologous non-myeloablative haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation compared with pulse cyclophosphamide once per month for systemic sclerosis (ASSIST): an open-label, randomised phase 2 trial.自体非清髓性造血干细胞移植与每月一次脉冲环磷酰胺治疗系统性硬化症的比较(ASSIST):一项开放标签、随机 2 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2011 Aug 6;378(9790):498-506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60982-3. Epub 2011 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of cyclophosphamide for skin fibrosis in systemic sclerosis: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.环磷酰胺治疗系统性硬化症皮肤纤维化的疗效:一项系统评价和单臂荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jun;81(6):863-874. doi: 10.1007/s00228-025-03837-3. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
2
Efficacy of methylprednisolone in very early systemic sclerosis: results of the 'Hit Hard and Early' randomized controlled trial.甲泼尼龙治疗极早期系统性硬化症的疗效:“早期强效治疗”随机对照试验结果
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Mar 1;64(3):1261-1269. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae156.
3
Relapsing Polychondritis Presenting 2 Years after Systemic Sclerosis with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

本文引用的文献

1
Intravenous cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in interstitial lung disease associated with systemic sclerosis in a retrospective open-label study: influence of the extent of inflammation on pulmonary function.一项回顾性开放性研究:静脉注射环磷酰胺脉冲疗法治疗系统性硬化症相关间质性肺病:炎症程度对肺功能的影响。
Clin Rheumatol. 2018 Oct;37(10):2715-2722. doi: 10.1007/s10067-018-4171-6. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
2
Patterns and predictors of skin score change in early diffuse systemic sclerosis from the European Scleroderma Observational Study.早期弥漫性系统性硬皮病中皮肤评分变化的模式和预测因素:来自欧洲硬皮病观察性研究。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Apr;77(4):563-570. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211912. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
3
系统性硬化症合并肺动脉高压2年后出现复发性多软骨炎。
Rheumatol Immunol Res. 2021 Sep 28;2(2):121-123. doi: 10.2478/rir-2021-0016. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
Is there still a role for cyclophosphamide in the treatment of systemic sclerosis?环磷酰胺在系统性硬化症的治疗中是否仍有作用?
J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2021 Jun;6(2):117-122. doi: 10.1177/2397198320961673. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
5
Domains and outcome measures for the assessment of limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis: an international collaborative scoping review.局限性皮肤系统性硬化症评估的领域和指标:一项国际协作范围综述。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Aug 3;61(8):3132-3148. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac049.
6
Systemic Sclerosis: From Pathophysiology to Novel Therapeutic Approaches.系统性硬化症:从病理生理学到新型治疗方法
Biomedicines. 2022 Jan 12;10(1):163. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10010163.
Efficacy of Mycophenolate Mofetil and Oral Cyclophosphamide on Skin Thickness: Post Hoc Analyses From Two Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials.
霉酚酸酯和口服环磷酰胺对皮肤厚度的疗效:两项随机安慰剂对照试验的事后分析。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Mar;70(3):439-444. doi: 10.1002/acr.23282. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
4
Standardization of the modified Rodnan skin score for use in clinical trials of systemic sclerosis.用于系统性硬化症临床试验的改良罗德南皮肤评分的标准化。
J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2017 Jan-Apr;2(1):11-18. doi: 10.5301/jsrd.5000231.
5
Survival and organ involvement in patients with limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis and anti-topoisomerase-I antibodies: determined by skin subtype or auto-antibody subtype? A long-term follow-up study.局限性皮肤型系统性硬化症合并抗拓扑异构酶-I抗体患者的生存情况及器官受累情况:由皮肤亚型还是自身抗体亚型决定?一项长期随访研究。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Nov;55(11):2001-2008. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew298. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
6
Prediction of improvement in skin fibrosis in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: a EUSTAR analysis.弥漫性皮肤系统性硬化症皮肤纤维化改善情况的预测:一项欧洲抗风湿病联盟系统性硬化症注册研究(EUSTAR)分析
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Oct;75(10):1743-8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208024. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
7
The American College of Rheumatology Provisional Composite Response Index for Clinical Trials in Early Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis.美国风湿病学会早期弥漫性皮肤系统性硬化症临床试验的临时综合反应指数。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Feb;68(2):299-311. doi: 10.1002/art.39501.
8
Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation vs intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: a randomized clinical trial.自身造血干细胞移植与静脉注射环磷酰胺冲击治疗弥漫性皮肤系统性硬化症:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2014 Jun 25;311(24):2490-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.6368.
9
Course of the modified Rodnan skin thickness score in systemic sclerosis clinical trials: analysis of three large multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trials.系统性硬化症临床试验中改良罗德南皮肤厚度评分的变化过程:三项大型多中心、双盲、随机对照试验的分析
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Aug;60(8):2490-8. doi: 10.1002/art.24681.
10
EULAR recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis: a report from the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR).欧洲抗风湿病联盟系统性硬化症治疗推荐:来自欧洲抗风湿病联盟硬皮病试验与研究组(EUSTAR)的报告
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 May;68(5):620-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.096677. Epub 2009 Jan 15.