• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

罕见的颈动脉支架置入并发症:影像系列报道

Uncommon Carotid Artery Stenting Complications: A Series by Images.

作者信息

Vadalà Giuseppe, Sucato Vincenzo, Costa Francesco, Castriota Fausto, Nerla Roberto, Roscitano Giuseppe, Versace Antonio Giovanni, Galassi Alfredo Ruggero, Micari Antonio

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, University Hospital Paolo Giaccone, 90100 Palermo, Italy.

Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), University of Palermo, 90146 Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2024 Feb 26;14(3):250. doi: 10.3390/jpm14030250.

DOI:10.3390/jpm14030250
PMID:38540992
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10971077/
Abstract

AIMS

To describe through emblematic images rare but clinically relevant carotid artery stenting complications that occurred at two high-volume centres for carotid artery stenting (CAS).

BACKGROUND

CAS is an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis in patients judged to be at high risk for CEA. CAS complications range between 1 and 9% and are higher in older patients complaining of neurological symptoms at the time of presentation. Besides periprocedural or early-after-procedure stroke, which remains the true Achilles' heel of CAS, other dramatic complications might compromise the clinical outcomes of this procedure.

METHODS

Five infrequent complications, out of more than 1000 CAS performed in the years 2016-2021, have been described.

RESULTS

Among CAS complications, acute carotid stent thrombosis, rescue retrieval of a disconnected distal cerebral embolic protection device, plaque prolapse after carotid stenting, cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS), and radial artery long sheath entrapment requiring surgical intervention were found to account for 0.3% of the total number of procedures performed by operators with high CAS volume.

CONCLUSIONS

Unusual CAS complications may infrequently occur, even in hands of expert operators. To know how to deal with such complications might help interventionalists to improve CAS performance.

摘要

目的

通过典型图像描述在两个大量开展颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)的中心发生的罕见但具有临床相关性的CAS并发症。

背景

对于被判定为颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)高风险的患者,CAS是治疗颈动脉狭窄的一种替代方法。CAS并发症发生率在1%至9%之间,在就诊时伴有神经症状的老年患者中更高。除了围手术期或术后早期卒中(这仍然是CAS真正的致命弱点)外,其他严重并发症可能会影响该手术的临床结果。

方法

描述了2016年至2021年期间在1000多例CAS手术中出现的5例罕见并发症。

结果

在CAS并发症中,急性颈动脉支架血栓形成、远端脑栓塞保护装置断开后的抢救性取出、颈动脉支架置入术后斑块脱垂、脑过度灌注综合征(CHS)以及需要手术干预的桡动脉长鞘嵌顿,占高CAS手术量操作者所进行的手术总数的0.3%。

结论

即使是在专家操作者手中,不常见的CAS并发症也可能偶尔发生。了解如何处理此类并发症可能有助于介入医生提高CAS手术的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34bb/10971077/f8aaf64dcfe5/jpm-14-00250-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34bb/10971077/b6f9af116e75/jpm-14-00250-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34bb/10971077/25f0c1ff7216/jpm-14-00250-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34bb/10971077/0eaedd319afc/jpm-14-00250-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34bb/10971077/3f47be59859b/jpm-14-00250-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34bb/10971077/f8aaf64dcfe5/jpm-14-00250-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34bb/10971077/b6f9af116e75/jpm-14-00250-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34bb/10971077/25f0c1ff7216/jpm-14-00250-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34bb/10971077/0eaedd319afc/jpm-14-00250-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34bb/10971077/3f47be59859b/jpm-14-00250-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34bb/10971077/f8aaf64dcfe5/jpm-14-00250-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Uncommon Carotid Artery Stenting Complications: A Series by Images.罕见的颈动脉支架置入并发症:影像系列报道
J Pers Med. 2024 Feb 26;14(3):250. doi: 10.3390/jpm14030250.
2
Technical improvements in carotid revascularization based on the mechanism of procedural stroke.基于手术性卒中机制的颈动脉血运重建技术改进。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2019 Jun;60(3):313-324. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.19.10918-4. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
3
Results of carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection with improved systems: Protected Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients at High Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy (PROTECT) trial.采用改良系统的颈动脉支架置入术治疗伴有远端栓塞保护装置的结果:高危颈动脉内膜切除术患者颈动脉支架置入术保护(PROTECT)试验。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Apr;55(4):968-976.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.120. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
4
Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): a randomised controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis.症状性颈动脉狭窄患者的颈动脉支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术比较(国际颈动脉支架置入研究):一项包含成本效益分析的随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Mar;20(20):1-94. doi: 10.3310/hta20200.
5
Endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting: the quest continues.动脉内膜切除术或颈动脉支架置入术:探索仍在继续。
Am J Surg. 2008 Feb;195(2):259-69. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.07.022.
6
Initial experience with cerebral protection devices to prevent embolization during carotid artery stenting.颈动脉支架置入术中使用脑保护装置预防栓塞的初步经验。
J Vasc Surg. 2002 Dec;36(6):1175-85. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.129488.
7
Hypoperfusion cerebral infarction after carotid artery stenting: A case report.颈动脉支架置入术后脑灌注不足性脑梗死:一例报告
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 9;9:1077826. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1077826. eCollection 2022.
8
Carotid Artery Stenting Without Embolic Protection Device: A Single-Center Experience.颈动脉支架置入术无栓塞保护装置:单中心经验。
J Endovasc Ther. 2019 Feb;26(1):121-127. doi: 10.1177/1526602818816656. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
9
Mechanism of Procedural Stroke Following Carotid Endarterectomy or Carotid Artery Stenting Within the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) Randomised Trial.国际颈动脉支架置入研究(ICSS)随机试验中颈动脉内膜切除术或颈动脉支架置入术后程序性卒中的机制
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Sep;50(3):281-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.05.017. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
10
Carotid Endarterectomy or Stenting in Octogenarians in a Monocentric Experience.八十岁老人行颈动脉内膜切除术或支架置入术的单中心经验
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 May;33:132-7. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.10.039. Epub 2016 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Case Report: Difficult radial artery sheath removal: a report of two cases and review of the literature.病例报告:桡动脉鞘管拔除困难:两例报告及文献复习
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 May 2;12:1581346. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1581346. eCollection 2025.
2
Emergency carotid endarterectomy with stent retrieval in a patient with stent migration following failed carotid artery stenting.颈动脉支架置入失败后支架移位患者的急诊颈动脉内膜切除术联合支架取出术
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Feb;41(2):206-209. doi: 10.1007/s12055-024-01778-7. Epub 2024 Jul 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Imaging and Hemodynamic Characteristics of Vulnerable Carotid Plaques and Artificial Intelligence Applications in Plaque Classification and Segmentation.易损性颈动脉斑块的影像学和血流动力学特征以及人工智能在斑块分类和分割中的应用
Brain Sci. 2023 Jan 13;13(1):143. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13010143.
2
Carotid Artery Stenting: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.颈动脉支架置入术:JACC 最新技术评价。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jul 12;80(2):155-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.05.007.
3
Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Calcified Lesions During Carotid Artery Stenting.
血管内碎石术治疗颈动脉支架置入术中的钙化病变。
J Endovasc Ther. 2021 Feb;28(1):93-99. doi: 10.1177/1526602820954244. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
4
Update on cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome.脑高灌注综合征更新。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Aug;12(8):788-793. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015621. Epub 2020 May 15.
5
Shockwave intravascular lithoplasty for the treatment of calcified carotid artery stenosis: A very early single-center experience.冲击波血管内碎石术治疗钙化性颈动脉狭窄:非常早期的单中心经验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;96(6):E608-E613. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28963. Epub 2020 May 7.
6
Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗颈动脉狭窄的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 25;2(2):CD000515. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000515.pub5.
7
Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.急性缺血性脑卒中患者早期管理指南:2018 年急性缺血性脑卒中早期管理指南的更新:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会发布的医疗保健专业人员指南。
Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000211. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
8
Radial Artery Access for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions: Contemporary Insights and Novel Approaches.经皮心血管介入治疗的桡动脉入路:当代见解与新方法
J Clin Med. 2019 Oct 18;8(10):1727. doi: 10.3390/jcm8101727.
9
Procedural success with radial access for carotid artery stenting: systematic review and meta-analysis.经桡动脉入路行颈动脉支架置入术的操作成功率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Jan;12(1):87-93. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014994. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
10
Clinical Predictors of Hyperperfusion Syndrome Following Carotid Stenting: Results From a National Prospective Multicenter Study.颈动脉支架置入术后高灌注综合征的临床预测因素:一项全国性前瞻性多中心研究的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 May 13;12(9):873-882. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.01.247.