Suppr超能文献

2012 - 2014年出院至专业护理机构的医疗保险受益人的住院医师护理与非住院医师护理的结果及成本

Hospitalist Vs. Non-Hospitalist Care Outcomes and Costs for Medicare Beneficiaries Discharged to Skilled Nursing Facilities in 2012-2014.

作者信息

Ryskina Kira L, Yuan Yihao, Polsky Daniel, Werner Rachel M

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 12-30 Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):214-219. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05459-9. Epub 2019 Oct 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospitals are increasingly at risk for post-acute care outcomes and spending, such as those in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). While hospitalists are thought to improve patient outcomes of acute care, whether these effects extend to the post-acute setting in SNFs is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To compare longer term outcomes of patients discharged to SNFs who were treated by hospitalists vs. non-hospitalists during their hospitalization.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants are Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries over 66 years of age who were hospitalized and discharged to a SNF in 2012-2014 (N = 2,839,779).

MAIN MEASURES

We estimated the effect of being treated by a hospitalist on 30-day rehospitalization and mortality, 60-day episode Medicare payments (Parts A and B), and successful discharge to community. Patients discharged to the community within 100 days of SNF admission who remained alive and not readmitted to a hospital or SNF for at least 30 days were considered successfully discharged. All outcomes were adjusted for demographics and clinical characteristics. To account for heterogeneity across facilities, we included hospital fixed effects.

KEY RESULTS

The 30-day rehospitalization rate was 17.59% for hospitalists' vs. 17.31% for non-hospitalists' patients (adjusted difference, 0.28%; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.44). Sixty-day payments were $26,301 for hospitalists' vs. $25,996 for non-hospitalists' patients (adjusted difference, $305; 95% CI, $243 to $367). There was a non-significant trend toward lower successful discharge to the community rate (adjusted difference, - 0.26%; 95% CI, - 0.48 to - 0.04) and lower mortality for patients of hospitalists (adjusted difference, - 0.12%; 95% CI, - 0.22 to - 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Among hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries who were discharged to SNFs, readmissions and Medicare costs were slightly higher for stays under the care of hospitalists compared with those of non-hospitalist generalist physicians, but there was a non-significant trend toward lower mortality.

摘要

背景

医院在急性后护理结果和支出方面面临的风险日益增加,比如在专业护理机构(SNFs)中。虽然人们认为住院医师能改善急性护理的患者结局,但这些效果是否能延伸至SNFs的急性后护理环境尚不清楚。

目的

比较在住院期间由住院医师与非住院医师治疗的、出院至SNFs的患者的长期结局。

设计

这是一项回顾性队列研究。

参与者

参与者为2012年至2014年期间住院并出院至SNFs的66岁以上医疗保险按服务付费受益人(N = 2,839,779)。

主要指标

我们评估了由住院医师治疗对30天再住院率和死亡率、60天期间医疗保险支付(A部分和B部分)以及成功出院至社区的影响。在SNF入院100天内出院至社区且存活、至少30天未再入院至医院或SNF的患者被视为成功出院。所有结局均根据人口统计学和临床特征进行了调整。为了考虑不同机构之间的异质性,我们纳入了医院固定效应。

关键结果

住院医师治疗的患者30天再住院率为17.59%,而非住院医师治疗的患者为17.31%(调整后差异为0.28%;95%可信区间为0.13%至0.44%)。住院医师治疗的患者60天支付费用为26,301美元,而非住院医师治疗的患者为25,996美元(调整后差异为305美元;95%可信区间为243美元至367美元)。住院医师治疗的患者成功出院至社区的比例有降低的趋势但不显著(调整后差异为 - 0.26%;95%可信区间为 - 0.48%至 - 0.04%),且死亡率有降低趋势(调整后差异为 - 0.12%;95%可信区间为 - 0.22%至 - 0.02%)。

结论

在出院至SNFs的住院医疗保险受益人中,与非住院医师普通内科医生治疗的患者相比,由住院医师护理期间的再入院率和医疗保险费用略高,但死亡率有降低趋势但不显著。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
Zero to 50,000 - The 20th Anniversary of the Hospitalist.从零到五万——住院医师制度诞生20周年
N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 15;375(11):1009-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1607958. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
9
The Minimum Data Set 3.0 Cognitive Function Scale.最小数据集3.0认知功能量表。
Med Care. 2017 Sep;55(9):e68-e72. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000334.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验