Briggs Adam M, Dozier Claudia L, Lessor Amber N, Kamana Bertilde U, Jess Rachel L
Eastern Michigan University.
University of Kansas.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2019 Oct;52(4):956-973. doi: 10.1002/jaba.648.
Previous research indicates that manipulating dimensions of reinforcement during differential reinforcement of alternative behavior (DRA) for situations in which extinction cannot be implemented is a potential approach for treating destructive behavior. Therefore, we replicated and extended previous research by determining (a) the conditions under which DRA without extinction decreased and maintained low levels of destructive behavior and (b) whether intervention effects maintained during reinforcement schedule thinning for the alternative response (i.e., compliance). Results showed that effective treatments were developed in the absence of extinction by manipulating the quality of reinforcement for compliance for 2 participants and by combining manipulations of the magnitude and quality of reinforcement for compliance for the other 2 participants. However, maintaining treatment effects during reinforcement schedule thinning required combining the magnitude and quality of reinforcement for 3 of the 4 participants. We discuss the clinical utility of this approach, review limitations of the study, and suggest directions for future research.
先前的研究表明,在无法实施消退的情况下,对替代行为进行差别强化(DRA)时操纵强化维度是治疗破坏性行为的一种潜在方法。因此,我们通过确定(a)无消退的DRA降低并维持低水平破坏性行为的条件,以及(b)在替代反应(即依从性)的强化程序变薄期间干预效果是否得以维持,来重复并扩展先前的研究。结果表明,对于2名参与者,通过操纵依从性强化的质量,在无消退的情况下开发出了有效的治疗方法;对于另外2名参与者,则通过结合操纵依从性强化的量和质量。然而,在4名参与者中的3名中,在强化程序变薄期间维持治疗效果需要结合强化的量和质量。我们讨论了这种方法的临床实用性,回顾了研究的局限性,并提出了未来研究的方向。