• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝硬化患者急性阑尾炎的管理与结局:一项全国性分析

Management and Outcomes of Acute Appendicitis in the Presence of Cirrhosis: A Nationwide Analysis.

作者信息

Garcia Monika, Gerber Ari, Zakhary Bishoy, Finco Tiago, Kazi Albert, Zhang Xiaofei, Brenner Megan, Coimbra Raul

出版信息

Am Surg. 2019 Oct 1;85(10):1129-1133.

PMID:31657308
Abstract

Best management for acute appendicitis (AA) in adults with liver cirrhosis is controversial and needs more investigation. We aimed to examine the impact of different treatment modalities on outcomes in this complex patient population. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 2012 to 2014 was queried to identify AA patients with no cirrhosis, compensated cirrhosis (CC), and decompensated cirrhosis (DC). Each cohort was further stratified according to the treatment type: nonoperative management, open appendectomy, and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). Chi-square, ANOVA, and binary regression analyses were used to determine differences between groups and risk factors for mortality and complications, with < 0.05 considered statistically significant. A total of 108,289 AA patients were analyzed; of those, 304 with CC and 134 with DC were identified. Compared with CC and no cirrhosis, DC patients had significantly higher mortality, higher cost, and longer hospital length of stay. LA is accompanied by higher survival, lower cost, shorter duration of hospitalization, and lower incidence of complications across all groups. We conclude that LA is the best management strategy for AA in cirrhotic patients. Even in decompensated cirrhotics, which are associated with worse clinical outcomes, LA is still a favorable option over open appendectomy and nonoperative management.

摘要

成人肝硬化患者急性阑尾炎(AA)的最佳治疗方法存在争议,需要更多研究。我们旨在研究不同治疗方式对这一复杂患者群体预后的影响。查询了2012年至2014年的全国住院患者样本数据库,以确定无肝硬化、代偿期肝硬化(CC)和失代偿期肝硬化(DC)的AA患者。每个队列根据治疗类型进一步分层:非手术治疗、开腹阑尾切除术和腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)。采用卡方检验、方差分析和二元回归分析来确定组间差异以及死亡率和并发症的危险因素,P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。共分析了108289例AA患者;其中,确定了304例CC患者和134例DC患者。与CC和无肝硬化患者相比,DC患者的死亡率显著更高、费用更高且住院时间更长。所有组中,LA的生存率更高、费用更低、住院时间更短且并发症发生率更低。我们得出结论,LA是肝硬化患者AA的最佳治疗策略。即使在临床预后较差的失代偿期肝硬化患者中,LA仍然是优于开腹阑尾切除术和非手术治疗的选择。

相似文献

1
Management and Outcomes of Acute Appendicitis in the Presence of Cirrhosis: A Nationwide Analysis.肝硬化患者急性阑尾炎的管理与结局:一项全国性分析
Am Surg. 2019 Oct 1;85(10):1129-1133.
2
Laparoscopic appendectomy trends and outcomes in the United States: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2004-2011.美国腹腔镜阑尾切除术的趋势与结果:来自2004 - 2011年全国住院患者样本(NIS)的数据
Am Surg. 2014 Oct;80(10):1074-7.
3
Laparoscopic appendectomy--is it worth the cost? Trend analysis in the US from 2000 to 2005.腹腔镜阑尾切除术——是否物有所值?2000年至2005年美国的趋势分析。
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Feb;208(2):179-85.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.10.026.
4
Risk factors for serious morbidity, prolonged length of stay and hospital readmission after laparoscopic appendectomy - results from Pol-LA (Polish Laparoscopic Appendectomy) multicenter large cohort study.腹腔镜阑尾切除术(Pol-LA)多中心大样本队列研究:术后严重并发症、住院时间延长和再次住院的风险因素。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 15;9(1):14793. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51172-2.
5
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. Prospective randomized study of outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术。结局的前瞻性随机研究。
Arch Surg. 1997 Jul;132(7):708-11; discussion 712. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430310022003.
6
Hospital preference of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: Effects on outcomes in simple and complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的医院偏好:对单纯性和复杂性阑尾炎结局的影响
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 May;51(5):804-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.02.028. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
7
Does laparoscopic appendectomy impart an advantage over open appendectomy in elderly patients?对于老年患者,腹腔镜阑尾切除术比开腹阑尾切除术有优势吗?
World J Surg. 2012 Jul;36(7):1534-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1545-9.
8
Comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis in the obese population.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗肥胖人群急性非穿孔与穿孔阑尾炎的比较。
Am J Surg. 2011 Dec;202(6):733-8; discussion 738-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.06.034. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
9
A comparison of an open and laparoscopic appendectomy for patients with liver cirrhosis.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001 Jun;11(3):189-94.
10
Advantages of laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly.老年患者行腹腔镜阑尾切除术的优势。
Am Surg. 2006 Jun;72(6):474-80.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes after emergency appendicectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis: a population-based cohort study from England.肝硬化患者行急诊阑尾切除术的结局:来自英格兰的基于人群的队列研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Sep 18;408(1):362. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03072-3.