• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的医院偏好:对单纯性和复杂性阑尾炎结局的影响

Hospital preference of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: Effects on outcomes in simple and complicated appendicitis.

作者信息

Tashiro Jun, Einstein Stephanie A, Perez Eduardo A, Bronson Steven N, Lasko David S, Sola Juan E

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Surgery, DeWitt-Daughtry Department of Surgery, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL.

South Florida Pediatric Surgeons, P.A., Plantation, FL.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2016 May;51(5):804-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.02.028. Epub 2016 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.02.028
PMID:26944182
Abstract

PURPOSE

We hypothesize that laparoscopic (LA) or open appendectomy (OA) outcomes are associated with hospital procedure preference.

METHODS

We queried Kids' Inpatient Database (1997-2009) for simple (ICD-9-CM 540.9) and complicated (540.0, 540.1) appendicitis.

RESULTS

On PS-matched analysis of simple appendicitis (91,118 LA vs. 97,496 OA), LA had increased transfusion (1.7) rates, but lower wound infection (0.6) and perforation/laceration (0.3) rates. LA had shorter length of stay (LOS; 1.7 vs. 2.1days), but higher total charges (TC; 19,501 vs. 13,089 USD) and cost (7121 vs. 5968) vs. OA. For complicated appendicitis (28,793 LA vs. 30,782 OA), LA had increased nausea/vomiting rates (1.9), but lower wound infection (0.5) and transfusion (0.6) rates. LA had shorter LOS (5.1 vs. 5.9), but higher TC (32,251 vs. 28,209). MVA demonstrated shorter LOS (0.9) for LA at laparoscopic-preferring hospitals vs. open-preferring hospitals for simple appendicitis. For complicated appendicitis, higher complication rates (1.1) were associated with OA at laparoscopic-preferring hospitals. Laparoscopic-preferring hospitals had higher TC in all categories.

CONCLUSION

Complications and resource utilization for appendicitis are associated with surgical technique and hospital procedure preference. Laparoscopic-preferring hospitals had higher complication rates with OA for complicated appendicitis and higher charges regardless of appendectomy technique or appendicitis type.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2c, Outcomes Research.

摘要

目的

我们假设腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)或开腹阑尾切除术(OA)的结果与医院的手术偏好有关。

方法

我们查询了儿童住院数据库(1997 - 2009年)中单纯性(ICD - 9 - CM 540.9)和复杂性(540.0、540.1)阑尾炎的数据。

结果

在对单纯性阑尾炎进行倾向得分匹配分析时(91,118例LA与97,496例OA),LA的输血率(1.7)升高,但伤口感染率(0.6)和穿孔/撕裂率(0.3)较低。与OA相比,LA的住院时间较短(LOS;1.7天对2.1天),但总费用(TC;19,501美元对13,089美元)和成本(7121对5968)较高。对于复杂性阑尾炎(28,793例LA与30,782例OA),LA的恶心/呕吐率升高(1.9),但伤口感染率(0.5)和输血率(0.6)较低。LA的住院时间较短(5.1天对5.9天),但总费用较高(32,251美元对28,209美元)。多变量分析显示,在倾向于腹腔镜手术的医院中,对于单纯性阑尾炎,LA的住院时间较短(0.9天)。对于复杂性阑尾炎,在倾向于腹腔镜手术的医院中,OA的并发症发生率较高(1.1)。倾向于腹腔镜手术的医院在所有类别中的总费用都较高。

结论

阑尾炎的并发症和资源利用与手术技术及医院的手术偏好有关。对于复杂性阑尾炎,倾向于腹腔镜手术的医院采用OA时并发症发生率较高,且无论阑尾切除术技术或阑尾炎类型如何,费用都较高。

证据级别

2c,结果研究。

相似文献

1
Hospital preference of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: Effects on outcomes in simple and complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的医院偏好:对单纯性和复杂性阑尾炎结局的影响
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 May;51(5):804-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.02.028. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
2
Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in management of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗单纯性和复杂性阑尾炎的疗效比较。
Ann Surg. 2011 Dec;254(6):927-32. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822aa8ea.
3
Advantages of laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly.老年患者行腹腔镜阑尾切除术的优势。
Am Surg. 2006 Jun;72(6):474-80.
4
Complicated appendicitis in children: is laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? A comparative study with the open appendectomy--our experience.儿童复杂性阑尾炎:腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否合适?与开腹阑尾切除术的比较研究——我们的经验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Oct;44(10):1924-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.03.037.
5
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. Prospective randomized study of outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术。结局的前瞻性随机研究。
Arch Surg. 1997 Jul;132(7):708-11; discussion 712. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430310022003.
6
Laparoscopic appendectomy--is it worth the cost? Trend analysis in the US from 2000 to 2005.腹腔镜阑尾切除术——是否物有所值?2000年至2005年美国的趋势分析。
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Feb;208(2):179-85.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.10.026.
7
Cost of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy.开腹与腹腔镜阑尾切除术的费用
Clin Ter. 2008 May-Jun;159(3):155-63.
8
Complicated appendicitis--is the laparoscopic approach appropriate? A comparative study with the open approach: outcome in a community hospital setting.复杂性阑尾炎——腹腔镜手术方法是否合适?与开放手术方法的比较研究:社区医院环境下的结果
Am Surg. 2007 Aug;73(8):737-41; discussion 741-2.
9
Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis is more favorable for patients with comorbidities, the elderly, and those with complicated appendicitis: a nationwide population-based study.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗阑尾炎对合并症患者、老年患者和复杂性阑尾炎患者更为有利:一项全国范围内基于人群的研究。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Sep;25(9):2932-42. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1645-x. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
10
Weekend vs. weekday appendectomy for complicated appendicitis, effects on outcomes and operative approach.周末与工作日进行复杂阑尾炎阑尾切除术对手术结果及手术方式的影响
Pediatr Surg Int. 2018 Jun;34(6):621-628. doi: 10.1007/s00383-018-4260-2. Epub 2018 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-Locking Polymeric Clips Are Safe for the Closure of Appendiceal Stump in Laparoscopic Appendectomy.自锁聚合物夹可安全用于腹腔镜阑尾切除术中阑尾残端的闭合。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 9;59(3):533. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030533.
2
Management of Complicated Appendicitis During Pregnancy in the US.美国妊娠期复杂性阑尾炎的管理
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e227555. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.7555.
3
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in pediatric patients with complicated appendicitis: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗小儿复杂性阑尾炎的Meta 分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Dec;33(12):4066-4077. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06709-x. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
4
A new right groin incision versus McBurney's incision for open appendectomy: a randomized controlled trial.开放性阑尾切除术采用新的右腹股沟切口与麦氏切口的随机对照试验
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 Nov;403(7):805-810. doi: 10.1007/s00423-018-1719-5. Epub 2018 Oct 20.
5
Weekend vs. weekday appendectomy for complicated appendicitis, effects on outcomes and operative approach.周末与工作日进行复杂阑尾炎阑尾切除术对手术结果及手术方式的影响
Pediatr Surg Int. 2018 Jun;34(6):621-628. doi: 10.1007/s00383-018-4260-2. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
6
Appendicitis: Rural Patient Status is Associated with Increased Duration of Prehospital Symptoms and Worse Outcomes in High- and Low-Middle-Income Countries.阑尾炎:农村患者的状况与高收入和中低收入国家院前症状持续时间延长和结局恶化相关。
World J Surg. 2018 Jun;42(6):1573-1580. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4344-5.
7
Acute appendicitis: should the laparoscopic approach be proposed as the gold standard? Six-year experience in an Emergency Surgery Unit.急性阑尾炎:腹腔镜手术方式应被视为金标准吗?一家急诊外科单位的六年经验。
G Chir. 2016 Jul-Aug;37(4):174-179. doi: 10.11138/gchir/2016.37.4.174.