• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面向城市机构的预测分析:儿童服务的经验教训。

Predictive Analytics for City Agencies: Lessons from Children's Services.

机构信息

Center for Urban Science and Progress, New York University , Brooklyn, New York.

出版信息

Big Data. 2017 Sep;5(3):189-196. doi: 10.1089/big.2016.0052. Epub 2017 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1089/big.2016.0052
PMID:28829624
Abstract

Many municipal agencies maintain detailed and comprehensive electronic records of their interactions with citizens. These data, in combination with machine learning and statistical techniques, offer the promise of better decision making, and more efficient and equitable service delivery. However, a data scientist employed by an agency to implement these techniques faces numerous and varied choices that cumulatively can have significant real-world consequences. The data scientist, who may be the only person at an agency equipped to understand the technical complexity of a predictive algorithm, therefore, bears a good deal of responsibility in making judgments. In this perspective, I use a concrete example from my experience of working with New York City's Administration for Children's Services to illustrate the social and technical tradeoffs that can result from choices made in each step of data analysis. Three themes underlie these tradeoffs: the importance of frequent communication between the data scientist, agency leadership, and domain experts; the agency's resources and organizational constraints; and the necessity of an ethical framework to evaluate salient costs and benefits. These themes inform specific recommendations that I provide to guide agencies that employ data scientists and rely on their work in designing, testing, and implementing predictive algorithms.

摘要

许多市政机构都保存着其与市民互动的详细且全面的电子记录。这些数据与机器学习和统计技术相结合,有望做出更好的决策,提供更高效、更公平的服务。然而,被机构雇用实施这些技术的数据科学家面临着许多不同的选择,这些选择加起来可能会对现实世界产生重大影响。作为机构中唯一有能力理解预测算法技术复杂性的人,数据科学家在做出判断时承担着很大的责任。在这篇观点文章中,我使用了一个具体的例子来说明在数据分析的每一步中所做出的选择可能带来的社会和技术权衡,这个例子来自于我在纽约市儿童服务管理局工作的经验。这三个主题是:数据科学家、机构领导和领域专家之间频繁沟通的重要性;机构的资源和组织限制;以及评估突出成本和收益的伦理框架的必要性。这些主题为我提供了具体的建议,以指导雇用数据科学家并依赖他们设计、测试和实施预测算法的机构。

相似文献

1
Predictive Analytics for City Agencies: Lessons from Children's Services.面向城市机构的预测分析:儿童服务的经验教训。
Big Data. 2017 Sep;5(3):189-196. doi: 10.1089/big.2016.0052. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
2
Serving immigrant families and children in New York City's child welfare system.为纽约市儿童福利系统中的移民家庭和儿童提供服务。
Child Welfare. 2005 Sep-Oct;84(5):713-23.
3
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
4
Organizing for agency: rethinking the conditions for children's participation in service provision.为机构赋权:重新思考儿童参与服务提供的条件
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2018;13(sup1):1564515. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2018.1564515.
5
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.
6
Integrating children's services in England: national evaluation of children's trusts.整合英格兰的儿童服务:对儿童信托基金的全国评估。
Child Care Health Dev. 2009 Mar;35(2):257-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00928.x. Epub 2009 Jan 14.
7
Multi-agency working in services for disabled children: what impact does it have on professionals?为残疾儿童提供服务的多机构合作:对专业人员有何影响?
Health Soc Care Community. 2005 Mar;13(2):155-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00543.x.
8
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
9
Facilitators and barriers for co-ordinated multi-agency services.协调多机构服务的促进因素和障碍。
Child Care Health Dev. 2004 Nov;30(6):571-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2004.00468.x.
10
What are children's trusts? Early findings from a national survey.什么是儿童信托基金?一项全国性调查的早期结果。
Child Care Health Dev. 2006 Mar;32(2):137-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00573.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk scores, label bias, and everything but the kitchen sink.风险评分、标签偏差以及除了厨房水槽之外的一切。
Sci Adv. 2024 Mar 29;10(13):eadi8411. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adi8411.
2
Racial disparities in automated speech recognition.种族差异与自动化语音识别。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 7;117(14):7684-7689. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915768117. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
3
Using family network data in child protection services.利用家庭网络数据为儿童保护服务提供支持。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 29;14(10):e0224554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224554. eCollection 2019.