National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Health Educ Behav. 2020 Jun;47(3):419-429. doi: 10.1177/1090198119885431. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
We aim to assess sedentary behavior (SB) and its determinants, as well as potential strategies to reduce SB among employees in a tertiary hospital in Singapore, using a mixed-methods approach grounded in the socioecological framework. All employees with email and security guards of a tertiary hospital in Singapore were invited to complete a questionnaire that captured sociodemographics and self-reported domain-specific SB. Environmental influences of occupational SB were assessed using an adapted version of the Checklist for Health Promotion Environments at the Worksite (CHEW). Focus group discussion (FGD) addressed perceptions, barriers, and strategies toward reducing workplace SB. Analyses were performed separately and integrated using an inductive comparative approach. The median occupational sitting time ( = 938) was 300 minutes/day, and highest among administrative staff (administrative, 421 minutes/day; allied health, 300 minutes/day; ancillary, 300 minutes/day; nursing, 120 minutes/day; medical/dental/others, 240 minutes/day; value: <.001). The CHEW assessment identified poor physical and information environment contributing to occupational SB. FGDs confirmed an unsupportive environment and elicited barriers such as low SB awareness, nature of work, and workplace norms. Besides environmental approaches, participants suggested having face-to-face communication and social modelling to promote more breaks from sitting. This mixed-methods study among diverse professional groups of a tertiary hospital indicated a large amount of occupational SB, particularly among administrative staff. Raising awareness of the health risks of SB and building a supportive organizational culture, information, and physical environment emerged as significant factors. To reduce occupational SB, multicomponent interventions addressing these diverse factors are warranted.
我们旨在使用基于社会生态学框架的混合方法评估新加坡一家三级医院员工的久坐行为 (SB) 及其决定因素,以及潜在的减少 SB 的策略。邀请新加坡一家三级医院的所有有电子邮件和保安的员工完成一份问卷,该问卷捕捉社会人口统计学和自我报告的特定领域的 SB。使用工作场所健康促进环境检查表 (CHEW) 的改编版本评估职业 SB 的环境影响。焦点小组讨论 (FGD) 探讨了对减少工作场所 SB 的看法、障碍和策略。分析分别进行,并使用归纳比较方法进行整合。职业坐姿时间中位数为 938 分钟/天,行政人员最高 (行政人员 421 分钟/天;联合健康人员 300 分钟/天;辅助人员 300 分钟/天;护理人员 120 分钟/天;医疗/牙科/其他人员 240 分钟/天; 值:<.001)。CHEW 评估确定了不良的物理和信息环境是导致职业 SB 的原因。FGD 证实了环境的不支持性,并发现了一些障碍,如 SB 意识低、工作性质和工作场所规范。除了环境方法外,参与者还建议进行面对面的沟通和社交示范,以促进更多的坐姿休息。这项针对三级医院不同专业群体的混合方法研究表明,职业 SB 大量存在,尤其是行政人员。提高对 SB 健康风险的认识和建立支持性的组织文化、信息和物理环境被认为是重要因素。为了减少职业 SB,需要针对这些不同因素采取多方面的干预措施。