School of Psychological Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
School of Biological and Population Health Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
J Am Coll Health. 2021 May-Jun;69(4):370-377. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2019.1679151. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
We evaluated how applying post-stratification sampling weights to National College Health Assessment II (NCHA-II) data affects estimates of substance use prevalence and tests of medical and recreational marijuana legalization (MML and RML) effects. : We constructed weights for Fall 2015 and Spring 2016 surveys ( = 90,503) using population information on U.S. undergraduates' gender and race/ethnicity and three institutional characteristics (region, city population, public/private). We estimated substance use prevalence (e.g., e-cigarettes, prescription opioid misuse) and compared 30-day marijuana use rates in states with RML, MML, or neither policy. : When unweighted versus weighted data were used, prevalence estimates did not differ appreciably; conclusions from logistic regressions were similar (weighted 30-day marijuana use rates among undergraduates in RML, MML, and non-ML states were 30.0%, 20.3%, and 16.3%, respectively) but effect sizes differed. : The value of using weighted NCHA-II data depends on the analysis and the precision required for the research questions.
我们评估了对国家大学生健康评估 II (NCHA-II)数据应用事后分层抽样权重会如何影响物质使用流行率的估计以及对医用和娱乐用大麻合法化(MML 和 RML)效果的检验。:我们使用美国大学生的性别、种族和三种机构特征(地区、城市人口、公立/私立)的人口信息,为 2015 年秋季和 2016 年春季调查( = 90,503)构建了权重。我们估计了物质使用的流行率(例如电子烟、处方类阿片类药物滥用),并比较了在有 RML、MML 或无任何政策的州的 30 天大麻使用率。:当使用未加权数据与加权数据时,流行率估计值没有明显差异;逻辑回归的结论相似(在 RML、MML 和非-ML 州的大学生中,30 天大麻使用率分别为 30.0%、20.3%和 16.3%),但效应大小不同。:使用加权 NCHA-II 数据的价值取决于分析以及研究问题所需的精度。