University of Vermont, United States of America; Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Burlington, VT, United States of America.
University of Vermont, United States of America; Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Burlington, VT, United States of America.
Prev Med. 2019 Nov;128:105865. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105865. Epub 2019 Oct 26.
Participation in secondary prevention programs such as cardiac rehabilitation (CR) reduces morbidity, mortality, and hospitalizations while improving quality of life. Executive function (EF) is a complex set of cognitive abilities that control and regulate behavior. EF predicts many health-related behaviors, but how EF interacts with interventions to improve treatment adherence is not well understood. The objective of this study is to examine if EF predicts CR treatment adherence and how EF interacts with an intervention to improve adherence. Data were collected from 2013 to 2018 in Vermont, USA. 130 Medicaid-enrolled individuals who had experienced a qualifying cardiac event were enrolled in a controlled clinical trial and randomized 1:1 to receive financial incentives for completing secondary prevention sessions or to usual care. In this secondary analysis, effects of EF on CR adherence (defined as completing ≥30/36 sessions) were examined in 112 participants (57 usual care, 55 intervention) who completed an EF battery. Delay-discounting, a measure of impulsivity, predicted CR adherence (p = 0.01) and interacted with the incentive intervention, such that those who exhibited greater discounting of future rewards benefitted more from the intervention than those who discounted less (F(1, 104) = 5.23, p = 0.02). Better cognitive flexibility, measured with the trail-making-task, also predicted CR adherence (p = 0.02). While EF has been associated with adherence to a variety of treatment regimens, this interaction between an incentive-based intervention to promote treatment adherence and EF is novel. This work illustrates the value of considering individual differences in EF when designing and implementing interventions to promote health-related behavior change.
参与心脏康复(CR)等二级预防计划可降低发病率、死亡率和住院率,同时提高生活质量。执行功能(EF)是一组复杂的认知能力,可控制和调节行为。EF 可预测许多与健康相关的行为,但 EF 如何与干预措施相互作用以提高治疗依从性尚不清楚。本研究的目的是检验 EF 是否可预测 CR 治疗依从性,以及 EF 如何与干预措施相互作用以提高依从性。数据于 2013 年至 2018 年在美国佛蒙特州收集。130 名参加了医疗保险的患者经历了一次符合条件的心脏事件,他们参加了一项对照临床试验,并以 1:1 的比例随机分配接受完成二级预防课程的经济奖励或常规护理。在这项二次分析中,在完成 EF 电池测试的 112 名参与者(57 名常规护理,55 名干预组)中检查了 EF 对 CR 依从性(定义为完成≥30/36 次)的影响。延迟折扣,一种冲动的衡量标准,预测了 CR 依从性(p=0.01),并且与激励干预相互作用,即那些表现出对未来奖励更大折扣的人比那些折扣较少的人从干预中获益更多(F(1,104)=5.23,p=0.02)。用连线测试测量的更好的认知灵活性也预测了 CR 依从性(p=0.02)。虽然 EF 与各种治疗方案的依从性有关,但这种激励型干预措施与 EF 之间的相互作用是新颖的。这项工作说明了在设计和实施促进健康相关行为改变的干预措施时考虑 EF 个体差异的价值。