Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, West Haven, Connecticut.
Respir Care. 2020 Feb;65(2):217-226. doi: 10.4187/respcare.07012. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
Commonly used thresholds for staging FEV have not been evaluated as standalone spirometric predictors of death in older persons. Specifically, the proportion of deaths attributed to a reduced FEV, when staged by commonly used thresholds in L, percent of predicted (% pred), and Z scores, has not been previously reported.
In 4,232 white persons ≥ 65 y old, sampled from the Cardiovascular Health Study, FEV was stratified as stage 1 (FEV ≥ 2.00 L, ≥80% pred, and Z score ≥-1.64), stage 2 (FEV 1.50-1.99 L, 50-79%pred, and Z score -2.55 to -1.63), and stage 3 (FEV < 1.50 L, < 50% pred, and Z score < -2.55). Notably, a Z score threshold of -1.64 defines normal-for-age lung function as the lower limit of normal (ie, 5th percentile of distribution), and accounts for differences in age, sex, height, and ethnicity. Next, adjusted odds ratios and average attributable fractions for 10-y all-cause mortality were calculated, comparing FEV stages 2 and 3 against stage 1, expressed in L, % pred, and Z scores. The average attributable fraction estimates the proportion of deaths attributed to a predictor by combining the prevalence of the predictor with the relative risk of death conferred by that predictor.
FEV stage 2 and 3 in L, % pred, and Z scores yielded similar adjusted odds ratios of death: 1.40-1.51 for stage 2 and 2.35-2.66 for stage 3. Conversely, FEV stages 2 and 3 in L, % pred, and Z scores differed in prevalence: 12.8-28.6% for stage 2 and 6.4-17.5% for stage 3, and also differed in the adjusted average attributable fraction for death: 3.2-6.4% for stage 2 and 4.5-9.1% for stage 3.
In older persons, the proportion of deaths attributed to a reduced FEV is best stratified by Z score staging thresholds because these yield a similar relative risk of death but a more age- and sex-appropriate prevalence of FEV stage.
常用于分期的 FEV 阈值并未被评估为老年人单独的预测死亡的肺功能指标。具体来说,用常用的 L、预计百分比(% pred)和 Z 分数阈值分期时,归因于 FEV 降低的死亡比例,尚未有报道。
在心血管健康研究中,从 4232 名年龄≥65 岁的白人中抽取样本,将 FEV 分为以下三个阶段:阶段 1(FEV≥2.00 L,≥80% pred,Z 分数≥-1.64),阶段 2(FEV 1.50-1.99 L,50-79% pred,Z 分数-2.55 至-1.63)和阶段 3(FEV<1.50 L,<50% pred,Z 分数<-2.55)。值得注意的是,Z 分数的阈值-1.64 将正常年龄相关的肺功能定义为正常范围的下限(即分布的第 5 个百分位数),并考虑了年龄、性别、身高和种族的差异。接下来,根据 L、% pred 和 Z 分数,计算了 10 年全因死亡率的调整比值比和平均归因分数,比较了阶段 2 和 3 与阶段 1。平均归因分数通过结合预测因素的患病率和该预测因素赋予的死亡相对风险来估计归因于预测因素的死亡比例。
阶段 2 和 3 的 FEV 在 L、% pred 和 Z 分数上的死亡调整比值比相似:阶段 2 为 1.40-1.51,阶段 3 为 2.35-2.66。相反,阶段 2 和 3 在 L、% pred 和 Z 分数上的患病率不同:阶段 2 为 12.8-28.6%,阶段 3 为 6.4-17.5%,死亡的调整平均归因分数也不同:阶段 2 为 3.2-6.4%,阶段 3 为 4.5-9.1%。
在老年人中,最好通过 Z 分数分期阈值来分层划分归因于 FEV 降低的死亡比例,因为这会产生相似的死亡相对风险,但更符合年龄和性别特点的 FEV 分期患病率。