Razvi Salman, Bhana Sindeep, Mrabeti Sanaa
Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 3BZ, UK.
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
J Thyroid Res. 2019 Sep 22;2019:4106816. doi: 10.1155/2019/4106816. eCollection 2019.
The pituitary hormone, thyrotropin (TSH), is regarded as the primary biomarker for evaluating thyroid function and is useful in guiding treatment with levothyroxine for patients with hypothyroidism. The amplified response of TSH to slight changes in thyroid hormone levels provides a large and easily measured signal in the routine care setting. Laboratories provide reference ranges with upper and lower cutoffs for TSH to define normal thyroid function. The upper limit of the range, used to diagnose subclinical (mild) hypothyroidism, is itself a matter for debate, with authoritative guidelines recommending treatment to within the lower half of the range. Concomitant diseases, medications, supplements, age, gender, ethnicity, iodine status, time of day, time of year, autoantibodies, heterophilic antibodies, smoking, and other factors influence the level of TSH, or the performance of current TSH assays. The long-term prognostic implications of small deviations of TSH from the reference range are unclear. Correction of TSH to within the reference range does not always bring thyroid and other biomarkers into range and will not always resolve the patient's symptoms. Overt hypothyroidism requires intervention with levothyroxine. It remains important that physicians managing a patient with symptoms suggestive of thyroid disease consider all of the patient's relevant disease, lifestyle, and other factors before intervening on the basis of a marginally raised TSH level alone. Finally, these limitations of TSH testing mitigate against screening the population for the undoubtedly substantial prevalence of undiagnosed thyroid disease, until appropriately designed randomised trials have quantified the benefits and harms from this approach.
垂体激素促甲状腺激素(TSH)被视为评估甲状腺功能的主要生物标志物,对指导甲状腺功能减退患者使用左甲状腺素治疗很有用。TSH对甲状腺激素水平轻微变化的放大反应在常规护理环境中提供了一个大且易于测量的信号。实验室提供TSH的参考范围及上下限,以定义正常的甲状腺功能。用于诊断亚临床(轻度)甲状腺功能减退的范围上限本身也存在争议,权威指南建议将治疗目标设定在该范围的下半部分以内。合并疾病、药物、补充剂、年龄、性别、种族、碘状态、一天中的时间、一年中的时间、自身抗体、嗜异性抗体、吸烟及其他因素会影响TSH水平或当前TSH检测的性能。TSH与参考范围的微小偏差的长期预后意义尚不清楚。将TSH校正到参考范围内并不总能使甲状腺及其他生物标志物也处于正常范围,也不总能缓解患者的症状。明显的甲状腺功能减退需要用左甲状腺素进行干预。对于有甲状腺疾病症状的患者,医生在仅根据TSH水平略有升高就进行干预之前,考虑患者所有相关的疾病、生活方式及其他因素仍然很重要。最后,TSH检测的这些局限性不利于对人群进行筛查,以确定未诊断甲状腺疾病的实际高患病率,除非有适当设计的随机试验量化了这种方法的利弊。