From the Departments of Anaesthesia and Critical Care.
Community Health.
Anesth Analg. 2020 Mar;130(3):769-776. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004495.
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) expedites return to patient baseline and functional status by reducing surgical trauma, stress, and organ dysfunction. Despite the potential benefits of enhanced recovery protocols, limited research has been done in low-resource settings, where 95% of cesarean deliveries are emergent and could possibly benefit from the application of ERAS protocols.
In a prospective, randomized, single-blind, controlled trial, mothers delivering by emergency cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to either an ERAS or a standard of care (SOC) recovery arm. Patients in the ERAS arm were treated with a modified ERAS protocol that included modified counseling and education, prophylactic antibiotics, antiemetics, normothermia, restrictive fluid administration, and multimodal analgesia. They also received early initiation of mobilization, feeding, and urethral catheter removal. The primary end point was length of hospital stay. The secondary end points were complications and readmission rates. Mean length of stay in the intervention and control arms were compared using t tests. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 13 (College Station, TX).
A total of 160 patients were enrolled in the study, with 80 randomized to each arm. There was a statistically significant shorter length of stay for the ERAS arm compared to SOC, with a difference of -18.5 hours (P < .001, 95% confidence interval [CI], -23.67, -13.34). The incidence of complications of severe pain and headache was lower in the ERAS arm compared to SOC (P = .001 for both complications). However, pruritus was more common in the ERAS arm compared to SOC (P = .023).
Use of an ERAS protocol for women undergoing emergency cesarean delivery in a low-income setting is feasible and reduces length of hospital stay without generally increasing the complication rate.
通过减少手术创伤、应激和器官功能障碍,术后加速康复(ERAS)可加快患者恢复至基线和功能状态。尽管强化康复方案有潜在益处,但在资源有限的环境中,相关研究较少,而这些环境中 95%的剖宫产为紧急剖宫产,可能受益于 ERAS 方案的应用。
在一项前瞻性、随机、单盲、对照试验中,行紧急剖宫产的母亲被随机分配到 ERAS 组或标准护理(SOC)恢复组。ERAS 组患者采用改良 ERAS 方案治疗,包括改良咨询和教育、预防性抗生素、止吐药、体温正常、限制液体摄入和多模式镇痛。他们还接受早期开始活动、喂养和导尿管移除。主要终点是住院时间。次要终点是并发症和再入院率。采用 t 检验比较干预组和对照组的平均住院时间。使用 STATA 版本 13(得克萨斯州学院站)进行统计分析。
共有 160 例患者入组研究,每组 80 例。与 SOC 相比,ERAS 组的住院时间有统计学显著缩短,差异为 -18.5 小时(P <.001,95%置信区间 [CI],-23.67,-13.34)。与 SOC 相比,ERAS 组严重疼痛和头痛并发症发生率较低(两种并发症均 P =.001)。然而,与 SOC 相比,ERAS 组瘙痒更常见(P =.023)。
在低收入环境中,对行紧急剖宫产的女性使用 ERAS 方案是可行的,可缩短住院时间,而不会普遍增加并发症发生率。