• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

翻修失败的椎间盘切除术。

Revision after failed discectomy.

机构信息

Spine Center, Schön Klinik München Harlaching, Harlachinger Strasse 51, 81547, Munich, Germany.

Academic Teaching Hospital and Spine Research Institute, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2020 Feb;29(Suppl 1):14-21. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06194-9. Epub 2019 Oct 29.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-019-06194-9
PMID:31664564
Abstract

PURPOSE

Recurrent lumbar disc herniation is the most common complication after discectomy. Due to the altered anatomy with the presence of scar tissue, the surgical revision of already operated patients could be a surgical challenge.

METHODS

We describe the microsurgical revision technique step by step with the evaluation of our own clinical results in comparison with primary lumbar disc surgeries. The clinical data are based on a clinical register with 2576 recorded primary surgeries (PD) and 592 cases of revisions (RD) with 12- and 24-month follow-up (FU). The intraoperative dura lesion rates of the surgeries between 2016 and 2018 were recorded retrospectively. Data from 894 primary disc surgeries and 117 revisions were evaluated.

RESULTS

The ODI and the VAS for leg and back pain improved in both groups significantly with slightly inferior outcome of the revision group. The ODI improved from 46.3 (PD) and 45.9 (RD), respectively, to 12.6 (PD) and 22.9 (RD) at the 24-month FU. The VAS dropped down as well in both group [VAS back: 47.8 (PD) and 43.9 (RD) to 19.9 and 32.2 at the 24-month FU; VAS leg: 62.9 (PD) and 65.5 (RD) to 15.6 and 26.8 at the 24-month FU]. During the primary interventions, we observed 1.5% (11/894) and during revisions 7.7% (9/117) of dura lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no clear guideline for the surgical treatment of recurrent disc herniations. In most cases, a pure re-discectomy is sufficient and can be performed safely and effectively with the help of a microscope. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

摘要

目的

腰椎间盘切除术后复发是最常见的并发症。由于存在疤痕组织,解剖结构发生改变,因此对已手术患者进行再次手术可能具有挑战性。

方法

我们逐步描述了显微外科翻修技术,并将其与原发性腰椎间盘手术的临床结果进行了比较。临床数据基于一个临床登记处,其中记录了 2576 例原发性手术(PD)和 592 例翻修手术(RD),随访时间为 12 个月和 24 个月。回顾性记录了 2016 年至 2018 年手术过程中硬脑膜损伤的发生率。评估了 894 例原发性椎间盘手术和 117 例翻修手术的数据。

结果

两组患者的 ODI 和腿部及背部疼痛的 VAS 均显著改善,翻修组的结果略差。ODI 从 PD 的 46.3(45.9)分别改善到 RD 的 12.6(22.9)在 24 个月的 FU 中。两组患者的 VAS 评分也都有所下降[VAS 背部:47.8(43.9)至 RD 的 19.9(32.2)和 24 个月的 FU;VAS 腿部:62.9(65.5)至 RD 的 15.6(26.8)和 24 个月的 FU]。在原发性手术中,我们观察到 1.5%(11/894)发生硬脑膜损伤,在翻修手术中,观察到 7.7%(9/117)发生硬脑膜损伤。

结论

对于复发性椎间盘突出症的手术治疗尚无明确的指南。在大多数情况下,单纯的再椎间盘切除术是足够的,并且可以在显微镜的帮助下安全有效地进行。这些幻灯片可以在电子补充材料中找到。

相似文献

1
Revision after failed discectomy.翻修失败的椎间盘切除术。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Feb;29(Suppl 1):14-21. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06194-9. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
2
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy, microendoscopic discectomy, and microdiscectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: minimum 2-year follow-up results.经皮内镜下经椎间孔椎间盘切除术、显微内镜下椎间盘切除术和显微椎间盘切除术治疗症状性腰椎间盘突出症的比较:至少2年的随访结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):317-325. doi: 10.3171/2017.6.SPINE172. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
3
Recurrent lumbar disc herniation: results of operative management.复发性腰椎间盘突出症:手术治疗结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Mar 15;26(6):672-6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200103150-00024.
4
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy compared with microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: 1-year results of an ongoing randomized controlled trial.经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术与显微内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项正在进行的随机对照试验的1年结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):300-310. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE161434. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
5
Radiographic and clinical outcomes of huge lumbar disc herniations treated by transforaminal endoscopic discectomy.经椎间孔内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗巨大腰椎间盘突出症的影像学及临床疗效
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019 Oct;185:105485. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105485. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
6
Asymptomatic same-site recurrent disc herniation after lumbar discectomy: results of a prospective longitudinal study with 2-year serial imaging.腰椎间盘切除术后无症状同节段复发性椎间盘突出症:前瞻性纵向研究 2 年连续影像学结果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 1;36(25):2147-51. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182054595.
7
Longitudinal clinical outcomes after full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy for recurrent disc herniation after open discectomy.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗开放手术后复发性椎间盘突出症的纵向临床结果。
J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Feb;72:124-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.12.047. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
8
Four-year follow-up results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation after conventional discectomy.经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术作为传统椎间盘切除术后复发性腰椎间盘突出症翻修手术的四年随访结果
J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Feb;22(2):331-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.06.098. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
9
Retrolisthesis and lumbar disc herniation: a postoperative assessment of outcomes at 8-year follow-up.退变性腰椎滑脱症和腰椎间盘突出症:8 年随访的术后疗效评估。
Spine J. 2019 Jun;19(6):995-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.12.010. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
10
Incidence of Low Back Pain After Lumbar Discectomy for Herniated Disc and Its Effect on Patient-reported Outcomes.腰椎间盘突出症行腰椎间盘切除术后腰痛的发生率及其对患者报告结局的影响。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):1988-99. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4193-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of repeat discectomy alone versus with spinal fusion in recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies.单纯重复椎间盘切除术与联合脊柱融合术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症的疗效:一项随机研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 May 9;48(1):409. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03555-5.
2
Repeat Discectomy or Instrumented Surgery for Recurrent Lumbar Disk Herniation: An Overview of French Spine Surgeons' Practice.复发性腰椎间盘突出症的翻修椎间盘切除术或器械辅助手术:法国脊柱外科医生的实践概述
Global Spine J. 2025 Apr;15(3):1533-1543. doi: 10.1177/21925682241249102. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Review.复发性腰椎间盘突出症:综述
Global Spine J. 2019 Apr;9(2):202-209. doi: 10.1177/2192568217745063. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
2
Comparative Clinical Effectiveness of Tubular Microdiscectomy and Conventional Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.管状微切除术与传统微切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Jul 15;44(14):1025-1033. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003001.
3
Surgical Treatment of Recurrent Lumbar Disk Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Lumbar percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: a retrospective survey on the first 172 adult patients treated in Denmark.
经皮椎间孔内窥镜下腰椎间盘切除术:丹麦 172 例成人患者的回顾性调查。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Mar 27;166(1):155. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06038-6.
4
Minimally invasive tubular microdiscectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: step-by-step technical description with safe scar dissection.微创管状微椎间盘切除术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症:安全的瘢痕解剖分步技术描述。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Oct 5;18(1):755. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04226-1.
5
Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: Does Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Lead to Better Clinical and Radiological Outcomes than Redo-Discectomy?复发性腰椎间盘突出症:与再次椎间盘切除术相比,经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术是否能带来更好的临床和影像学结果?
Asian Spine J. 2023 Oct;17(5):862-869. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0210. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
6
Moderate to Severe Multifidus Fatty Atrophy is the Risk Factor for Recurrence After Microdiscectomy of Lumbar Disc Herniation.中重度多裂肌脂肪萎缩是腰椎间盘突出症显微椎间盘切除术后复发的危险因素。
Neurospine. 2023 Jun;20(2):637-650. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346054.027. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
7
A Review and Summary of Patients with Symptomatic Postoperative Discal Pseudocysts of the Lumbar Spine.腰椎术后症状性椎间盘假性囊肿患者的回顾性总结。
Orthop Surg. 2023 May;15(5):1256-1263. doi: 10.1111/os.13689. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
8
Posterior Dynamic Stabilization with Limited Rediscectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation.后路有限减压动态稳定系统治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症
Pain Res Manag. 2021 Dec 23;2021:1288246. doi: 10.1155/2021/1288246. eCollection 2021.
9
15-year survivorship analysis of an interspinous device in surgery for single-level lumbar disc herniation.单节段腰椎间盘突出症手术中棘突间装置 15 年的生存分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Dec 9;22(1):1030. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04929-8.
10
Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study with Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.全内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症:一项采用患者报告结局指标的回顾性研究
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2020 Nov 20;5(4):272-277. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2020-0159. eCollection 2021.
复发性腰椎间盘突出症的外科治疗:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Orthopedics. 2018 Jul 1;41(4):e457-e469. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20180621-01. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
4
Treatment for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation.复发性腰椎间盘突出症的治疗
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Dec;10(4):517-520. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9450-3.
5
The debate on most ideal technique for managing recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a short review.关于复发性腰椎间盘突出症最理想治疗技术的争论:简要综述
Br J Neurosurg. 2017 Dec;31(6):701-708. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2017.1368451. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
6
Tubular discectomy versus conventional microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: long-term results of a randomised controlled trial.管状切除术与传统微创手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项随机对照试验的长期结果。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017 Dec;88(12):1008-1016. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-315306. Epub 2017 May 26.
7
Surgical management of recurrent lumbar disc herniation and the role of fusion.复发性腰椎间盘突出症的外科治疗及融合术的作用
J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Jan;23:44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.04.024. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
8
Risk factors of recurrent lumbar disk herniation.复发性腰椎间盘突出症的危险因素。
Asian J Neurosurg. 2013 Apr;8(2):93-6. doi: 10.4103/1793-5482.116384.
9
Risk factors of recurrent lumbar disk herniation: a single center study and review of the literature.复发性腰椎间盘突出症的危险因素:一项单中心研究及文献综述
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 Jun;28(5):E265-9. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828215b3.
10
Asymptomatic same-site recurrent disc herniation after lumbar discectomy: results of a prospective longitudinal study with 2-year serial imaging.腰椎间盘切除术后无症状同节段复发性椎间盘突出症:前瞻性纵向研究 2 年连续影像学结果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 1;36(25):2147-51. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182054595.