Departments of Medical Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Department of Biostatistics, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;146(1):287-295. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-03060-5. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
Trastuzumab plus chemotherapy is an effective therapy in HER2 positive advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, the optimal maintenance treatment in patients benefited from the first line therapy remains unclear.
In this prospective observational study, patients with HER2 positive AGC who received six cycles of trastuzumab-based first line chemotherapy were divided into two arms according to the maintenance strategy: trastuzumab monotherapy (arm A) and trastuzumab plus mono-chemo-agent derived from the initial chemotherapy (arm B). The primary end point was overall survival (OS), the secondary end points were first line progression free survival (PFS), maintenance PFS, cost-effectiveness ratios (CERs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and safety.
30 patients were in arm A received trastuzumab monotherapy and 48 were in arm B. The clinical and pathological characteristics of two arms were well balanced. There was no significant difference of median OS (16.5 vs 20.0 months, HR 0.71 P = 0.169) or PFS (7.9 vs 11.0, HR 1.06, P = 0.892) between two arms, however, adding chemo-agent could lead to a 29% reduction in mortality risk. Adverse effects including cardiac safety were also similar. Subgroup analysis showed chemotherapy additional to trastuzumab benefited on OS in patients who had stable disease (SD) of response (HR: 0.084, P = 0.004), elder than 65 years old (HR: 0.4, P = 0.015), without liver metastasis (HR: 0.271, P = 0.008) or less than two organs of distance metastasis (HR: 0.263, P = 0.005). The average cost per patients in arm A was 153,137 RMB and 165,195 RMB in arm B. While, ICER in arm A was 1.29 times higher than arm B (CERs of two arms were 19,384 vs 15,018 RMB).
Mono-chemo-agent combined with trastuzumab showed an advantage of absolute value and hazard ratio on OS, in addition to ICER of PFS for patients who benefit from the initial six cycles of trastuzumab-based first line therapy, especially in patients with certain clinical or treatment-related characterisitics. A large sample randomized trial is warranted.
曲妥珠单抗联合化疗是治疗人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)阳性晚期胃癌(AGC)的有效方法。然而,一线治疗中获益的患者的最佳维持治疗仍不清楚。
在这项前瞻性观察性研究中,接受基于曲妥珠单抗的一线化疗 6 个周期的 HER2 阳性 AGC 患者根据维持策略分为两组:曲妥珠单抗单药治疗(A 组)和曲妥珠单抗联合初始化疗中使用的单化疗药物(B 组)。主要终点是总生存期(OS),次要终点是一线无进展生存期(PFS)、维持 PFS、成本效果比(CER)、增量成本效果比(ICER)和安全性。
A 组 30 例患者接受曲妥珠单抗单药治疗,B 组 48 例患者接受曲妥珠单抗联合单化疗药物治疗。两组的临床和病理特征均良好平衡。两组中位 OS(16.5 与 20.0 个月,HR 0.71,P=0.169)或 PFS(7.9 与 11.0,HR 1.06,P=0.892)无显著差异,但添加化疗药物可使死亡率降低 29%。不良反应,包括心脏安全性,也相似。亚组分析表明,对于疾病稳定(SD)反应的患者(HR:0.084,P=0.004)、年龄大于 65 岁(HR:0.4,P=0.015)、无肝转移(HR:0.271,P=0.008)或远处转移器官少于两个(HR:0.263,P=0.005),曲妥珠单抗联合化疗对 OS 有获益。A 组每名患者的平均费用为 153137 元,B 组为 165195 元。而 A 组的 ICER 比 B 组高 1.29 倍(两组的 CERs 分别为 19384 元和 15018 元)。
对于初始接受基于曲妥珠单抗的一线治疗中获益的患者,除了 PFS 的 ICER 外,单化疗药物联合曲妥珠单抗在 OS 上具有绝对优势和风险比,特别是对于具有某些临床或治疗相关特征的患者。需要进行大样本随机试验。