J Appl Psychol. 2019 Nov;104(11):1433. doi: 10.1037/apl0000467.
Reports an error in "Doing good, feeling good? The roles of helping motivation and citizenship pressure" by Katrina Jia Lin, Krishna Savani and Remus Ilies (, 2019[Aug], Vol 104[8], 1020-1035). In the article, there are several errors in Figure 3 and Table 4. For Figure 3, results from the simple slope analyses are reversed in the figure. The corrected values are noted below: The value for lower citizenship pressure (the solid line) should be b = 0.21**, and the value for higher citizenship pressure (the dotted line) should be b = 0.40**. In Table 4 under within-variance%, the percentage signs of the first three values are missing. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2019-05153-001.) Drawing on self-determination theory, this research investigates whether the motivation behind employees' helping behaviors is associated with their positive affect and their subsequent help provision, and whether citizenship pressure moderates these relationships. A recall-based experiment and an experience-sampling study capturing helping episodes among fulltime employees found that when employees helped coworkers because of higher autonomous (controlled) motivation in a helping episode, they experienced higher (lower) positive affect, and they had stronger (weaker) helping intentions and helped coworkers more (less) subsequently. We further found that citizenship pressure enhanced the positive relationship between episodic autonomous motivation and positive affect. Overall, the results challenge the universality of the "doing good-feeling good" effect and explicate the joint roles of citizenship pressure and helpers' episodic motivation in influencing employees' positive affect and their subsequent helping behaviors. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
报告了 Katrina Jia Lin、Krishna Savani 和 Remus Ilies 的文章“做好事感觉好吗?帮助动机和公民压力的作用”(,2019[8 月],第 104 卷[8],1020-1035)中的错误。在文章中,图 3 和表 4 中有几处错误。对于图 3,简单斜率分析的结果在图中颠倒了。更正后的数值如下:较低公民压力(实线)的值应为 b = 0.21**,较高公民压力(虚线)的值应为 b = 0.40**。在表 4 中的“within-variance%”下,前三个值的百分号缺失。(原始文章的摘要如下出现在记录 2019-05153-001 中。)本研究借鉴自我决定理论,探讨了员工帮助行为背后的动机是否与他们的积极情绪及其随后的帮助提供有关,以及公民压力是否调节这些关系。一项基于回忆的实验和一项经验抽样研究,记录了全职员工的帮助事件,发现当员工在帮助事件中出于更高的自主(控制)动机而帮助同事时,他们会体验到更高(更低)的积极情绪,并且他们有更强(弱)的帮助意愿,随后更(更少)帮助同事。我们进一步发现,公民压力增强了阶段性自主动机和积极情绪之间的正相关关系。总的来说,这些结果挑战了“做好事感觉好”效应的普遍性,并说明了公民压力和帮助者阶段性动机在影响员工积极情绪和随后的帮助行为中的共同作用。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。