• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环境氧气含量、安全鞋类型和举升频率对受试者 MAWL 和生理反应的影响。

Effect of Ambient Oxygen Content, Safety Shoe Type, and Lifting Frequency on Subject's MAWL and Physiological Responses.

机构信息

Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Exercise Physiology, College of Sport Sciences & Physical Activity, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 29;16(21):4172. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214172.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph16214172
PMID:31671827
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6862084/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the lifting capabilities of individuals in hypoxia when they wear different types of safety shoes and to investigate the behavior of the physiological responses induced by the lifting process associated with those variables.

METHODS

An experimental design was used, based on two sessions. The first was training and acclimatization session, then an experimental lifting phase. A total of ten male students of King Saud University were recruited in the study. A four-way repeated measures design, with four independent variables and six dependent variables, was used in this research. The independent variables that were studied in the experimental lifting phase were: ambient oxygen content (15%, 18%, and 21%), safety shoes type (light-duty, medium-duty, and heavy-duty), lifting frequency (1 and 4 lifts/min), and replication (first and second trials). The dependent variables were also: maximum acceptable weights lifting using the psychophysical technique, heart rate (HR), electromyography (EMG) of (biceps brachii, trapezius, anterior deltoid, and erector spinae), safety shoes discomfort rating, rating of perceived exertion, and ambient oxygen discomfort rating.

RESULTS

The maximum acceptable weights lifting that were selected by participants at lower levels of the independent variables (ambient oxygen content 21%, lifting frequency 1 lift/min, and first replication) were significantly higher than at high levels of the independent variables (ambient oxygen content 15%, lifting frequency 4 lift/min, and second replication). Several interaction effects were also significant.

CONCLUSIONS

It provides evidence that the ambient oxygen content increases the intensity of workload in lifting tasks. It showed that oxygen content affects the psychophysical selection of maximum acceptable weights lifting and the physiological responses represented in muscular activities and heart rate. It suggests that ambient oxygen content must be considered along with the type of safety shoes worn when the lifting task at altitudes occurs.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估个体在穿着不同类型安全鞋时处于低氧环境下的举升能力,并研究与这些变量相关的举升过程中生理反应的行为。

方法

采用基于两个阶段的实验设计。第一阶段是培训和适应阶段,然后是实验举升阶段。本研究共招募了 10 名沙特国王大学的男性学生。在这个研究中使用了一个四向重复测量设计,有四个独立变量和六个因变量。在实验举升阶段研究的独立变量有:环境氧气含量(15%、18%和 21%)、安全鞋类型(轻型、中型和重型)、举升频率(1 次/分钟和 4 次/分钟)和重复(第一次和第二次试验)。因变量还包括:使用心理物理技术的最大可承受重量举升、心率(HR)、(肱二头肌、斜方肌、三角肌和竖脊肌)肌电图、安全鞋不适评级、感知用力评级和环境氧气不适评级。

结果

参与者在低水平独立变量(环境氧气含量 21%、举升频率 1 次/分钟和第一次重复)下选择的最大可承受重量举升明显高于高水平独立变量(环境氧气含量 15%、举升频率 4 次/分钟和第二次重复)。几个交互效应也很显著。

结论

它提供了证据表明,环境氧气含量增加了举升任务的工作强度。它表明,氧气含量会影响心理物理选择的最大可承受重量举升以及肌肉活动和心率所代表的生理反应。它表明,在海拔高度进行举升任务时,必须考虑环境氧气含量以及所穿安全鞋的类型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c60/6862084/dd4ec7e2d5c5/ijerph-16-04172-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c60/6862084/cdd64fda1929/ijerph-16-04172-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c60/6862084/26b46329863b/ijerph-16-04172-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c60/6862084/9e6d9caa01dc/ijerph-16-04172-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c60/6862084/dd4ec7e2d5c5/ijerph-16-04172-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c60/6862084/cdd64fda1929/ijerph-16-04172-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c60/6862084/26b46329863b/ijerph-16-04172-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c60/6862084/9e6d9caa01dc/ijerph-16-04172-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c60/6862084/dd4ec7e2d5c5/ijerph-16-04172-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Ambient Oxygen Content, Safety Shoe Type, and Lifting Frequency on Subject's MAWL and Physiological Responses.环境氧气含量、安全鞋类型和举升频率对受试者 MAWL 和生理反应的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 29;16(21):4172. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214172.
2
Using Electroencephalography (EEG) Power Responses to Investigate the Effects of Ambient Oxygen Content, Safety Shoe Type, and Lifting Frequency on the Worker's Activities.利用脑电图(EEG)功率响应研究环境氧气含量、安全鞋类型和提升频率对工人活动的影响。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Apr 4;2020:7956037. doi: 10.1155/2020/7956037. eCollection 2020.
3
Effects of Lifting Method, Safety Shoe Type, and Lifting Frequency on Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift, Physiological Responses, and Safety Shoes Discomfort Rating.举升方法、安全鞋类型和举升频率对最大可承受举升重量、生理反应和安全鞋不适评级的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 26;17(9):3012. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093012.
4
Investigation of precision task demands on workers' muscular activities, heart rate, and perceived exertion rating.研究工人肌肉活动、心率和感知用力评级的精确任务需求。
Work. 2022;72(4):1443-1453. doi: 10.3233/WOR-205151.
5
Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females.中国女性不对称举重的最大可接受重量。
Appl Ergon. 2003 May;34(3):215-24. doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00010-3.
6
An investigation of perceived exertion via whole body exertion and direct muscle force indicators during the determination of the maximum acceptable weight of lift.
Ergonomics. 2000 Feb;43(2):143-59. doi: 10.1080/001401300184521.
7
An on-body personal lift augmentation device (PLAD) reduces EMG amplitude of erector spinae during lifting tasks.一种可穿戴式个人举升辅助装置(PLAD)可降低举重任务期间竖脊肌的肌电图幅度。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2006 Jun;21(5):456-65. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.12.021. Epub 2006 Feb 21.
8
Physiological and psychophysical responses in handling maximum acceptable weights under different footwear--floor friction conditions.在不同鞋类与地面摩擦条件下搬运最大可接受重量时的生理和心理物理反应。
Appl Ergon. 2007 May;38(3):259-65. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.06.006. Epub 2006 Sep 27.
9
Maximum acceptable weight of lift for side and back lifting.侧面和背部抬举的最大可接受抬举重量。
J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 1990 Jun;19(1):3-11.
10
Psychophysical lifting capacity over extended periods.
Ergonomics. 1991 Jan;34(1):23-32. doi: 10.1080/00140139108967285.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Lifting Method, Safety Shoe Type, and Lifting Frequency on Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift, Physiological Responses, and Safety Shoes Discomfort Rating.举升方法、安全鞋类型和举升频率对最大可承受举升重量、生理反应和安全鞋不适评级的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 26;17(9):3012. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093012.
2
Using Electroencephalography (EEG) Power Responses to Investigate the Effects of Ambient Oxygen Content, Safety Shoe Type, and Lifting Frequency on the Worker's Activities.利用脑电图(EEG)功率响应研究环境氧气含量、安全鞋类型和提升频率对工人活动的影响。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Apr 4;2020:7956037. doi: 10.1155/2020/7956037. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
The effects of protective footwear on spine control and lifting mechanics.防护鞋对脊柱控制和举升力学的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Apr;76:122-129. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.12.009. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
2
The Global Burden of Musculoskeletal Pain-Where to From Here?全球肌肉骨骼疼痛负担——路在何方?
Am J Public Health. 2019 Jan;109(1):35-40. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304747. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
3
Prevalence of work related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) and ergonomic risk assessment among readymade garment workers of Bangladesh: A cross sectional study.
孟加拉国成衣工人中与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病(WMSDs)和人体工程学风险评估的流行情况:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 6;13(7):e0200122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200122. eCollection 2018.
4
Determining Changes in Electromyography Indices when Measuring Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift in Iranian Male Students.测定伊朗男学生最大可接受举升重量时肌电图指标的变化
J Biomed Phys Eng. 2018 Mar 1;8(1):73-86. eCollection 2018 Mar.
5
Clinical recommendations for high altitude exposure of individuals with pre-existing cardiovascular conditions: A joint statement by the European Society of Cardiology, the Council on Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology, the European Society of Hypertension, the International Society of Mountain Medicine, the Italian Society of Hypertension and the Italian Society of Mountain Medicine.有心血管疾病既往史者高原暴露的临床推荐:欧洲心脏病学会、欧洲心脏病学会高血压委员会、欧洲高血压学会、国际山地医学学会、意大利高血压学会和意大利山地医学学会的联合声明。
Eur Heart J. 2018 May 1;39(17):1546-1554. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx720.
6
Difference between male and female workers lifting the same relative load when palletizing boxes.在码放箱子时搬运相同相对负荷的男性和女性工人之间的差异。
Appl Ergon. 2017 Apr;60:93-102. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.10.014. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
7
Changes in Back Compressive Force When Measuring Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift in Iranian Male Students.测量伊朗男学生最大可接受提举重量时背部压力的变化
Iran J Public Health. 2016 Sep;45(9):1199-1207.
8
Study on Oxygen Supply Standard for Physical Health of Construction Personnel of High-Altitude Tunnels.高原隧道施工人员身体健康供氧量标准研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Dec 22;13(1):ijerph13010064. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13010064.
9
Humidity: A review and primer on atmospheric moisture and human health.湿度:关于大气湿度与人类健康的综述及入门指南
Environ Res. 2016 Jan;144(Pt A):106-116. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.10.014. Epub 2015 Nov 21.
10
Regulation of cardiac output in hypoxia.缺氧时心输出量的调节
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Dec;25 Suppl 4:53-9. doi: 10.1111/sms.12619.