Department of Urology, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, TX.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, TX.
Urol Oncol. 2020 Jan;38(1):4.e1-4.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.09.008. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
There is growing interest in a bladder preservation approach using chemoradiation therapy with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), i.e., combined modality treatment (CMT), for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). We have initiated a pilot study to determine feasibility of conducting a larger-scale clinical trial comparing CMT to radical cystectomy (RC) in patients with MIBC. Here we present the screening logs from the recruitment phase of this trial.
Patients who were diagnosed to have MIBC after TURBT between April 2016 and August 2017 and considered to be candidates for surgery were enrolled in this prospective, single center, randomized controlled pilot feasibility trial and scheduled to undergo RC (with neoadjuvant chemotherapy if appropriate) or CMT.
Of 62 patients screened during the recruitment phase, only 5 were found to be suitable candidates for either treatment modality hence eligible for randomization. The reasons for exclusion were as follows: multifocal disease (n = 24, 40%), variant histology (n = 15, 25%), previous pelvic radiation (n = 6, 10%), severe lower urinary tract symptoms (n = 5, 8.3%), unwillingness to be enrolled (n = 8, 13.3%), and receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 2, 3.3%). One of the 5 eligible patients was randomized to CMT but was subsequently switched to RC because of a high tumor burden, 1 was randomized to RC, 2 were randomized to CMT but subsequently underwent TURBT and were considered ineligible because of extensive bladder disease, and 1 elected to undergo RC.
We identified many patients with MIBC over a period of 16 months. However, the number of patients eligible to receive chemotherapy and in whom cystectomy and radiation therapy were both valid options was not as high as previously reported in retrospective CMT series. Many patients were excluded after TURBT. Our preliminary data indicate that only a very small subset of patients with MIBC are ideal candidates for CMT. Further research is required to identify patients who are suitable for CMT.
采用含经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(TURBT)的放化疗(即联合治疗模式,CMT)治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)的膀胱保留方法引起了越来越多的关注。我们已启动一项研究,以确定在 MIBC 患者中开展一项比较 CMT 与根治性膀胱切除术(RC)的更大规模临床试验的可行性。在此,我们展示该试验招募阶段的筛选记录。
2016 年 4 月至 2017 年 8 月期间,在接受 TURBT 后诊断为 MIBC 且被认为适合手术的患者被纳入这项前瞻性、单中心、随机对照的初步可行性试验中,并计划接受 RC(如果合适,采用新辅助化疗)或 CMT。
在招募阶段,共筛选了 62 例患者,仅有 5 例符合两种治疗方式的入选标准,因此有资格进行随机分组。排除的原因如下:多发病灶(n=24,40%)、变异型组织学(n=15,25%)、盆腔放疗史(n=6,10%)、严重下尿路症状(n=5,8.3%)、不愿入组(n=8,13.3%)和新辅助化疗(n=2,3.3%)。5 例符合条件的患者中,1 例随机分配至 CMT,但由于肿瘤负荷高而转为 RC,1 例随机分配至 RC,2 例随机分配至 CMT,但随后因广泛的膀胱疾病行 TURBT 且被认为不适合入组,1 例选择行 RC。
我们在 16 个月的时间内发现了许多 MIBC 患者。然而,适合接受化疗,且膀胱切除术和放疗均可行的患者数量并不像回顾性 CMT 系列研究中报道的那么多。许多患者在 TURBT 后被排除在外。我们的初步数据表明,只有非常小部分 MIBC 患者是 CMT 的理想候选者。需要进一步的研究来确定适合 CMT 的患者。