Suppr超能文献

使用眼动追踪方法对酒精使用障碍和暴饮暴食障碍中的冲动性进行跨诊断研究——一项试点研究

Transdiagnostic Investigation of Impulsivity in Alcohol Use Disorder and Binge Eating Disorder With Eye-Tracking Methodology-A Pilot Study.

作者信息

Schag Kathrin, Rauch-Schmidt Magdalena, Wernz Friederike, Zipfel Stephan, Batra Anil, Giel Katrin E

机构信息

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Competence Center for Eating Disorders Tübingen (KOMET), Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2019 Oct 18;10:724. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00724. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and patients with binge eating disorder (BED) are characterized by increased impulsivity, i.e. increased reward sensitivity and diminished response inhibition. In this pilot study, we compare both disorders directly concerning impulsivity using disorder-specific stimuli to gain insight into the relationship of both disorders and underlying mechanisms. We compared eye movements of 23 women with BED (age = 40.9), 21 participants with AUD (13 females, 8 males, age = 46.6), and age- and sex-matched control groups (BED-CG and AUD-CG, respectively). We measured reward sensitivity with the free exploration paradigm and response inhibition with the modified antisaccade paradigm. We presented disorder-specific stimuli vs. neutral stimuli, i.e. food stimuli in the BED and BED-CG and alcohol stimuli in the AUD and AUD-CG. BED and BED-CG initially fixated more often on food stimuli vs. neutral stimuli, whereas AUD and AUD-CG initially fixated more often on neutral stimuli vs. alcohol stimuli. AUD showed shorter dwell times on both stimulus categories in comparison with the other groups. When saccades towards stimuli should be inhibited, BED made more errors in first saccades for both stimulus categories in comparison with AUD-CG and in second saccades particularly for food stimuli in comparison with all other groups, whereas AUD did not differ from the control groups. This pilot study indicates that food and alcohol stimuli are at the first sight differently processed. Moreover, patients with BED and with AUD seem to process disorder-specific stimuli differently. Whereas patients with AUD avoid stimuli generally, patients with BED predominantly show deficits in inhibitory control.

摘要

患有酒精使用障碍(AUD)的患者和患有暴饮暴食症(BED)的患者具有冲动性增加的特征,即奖赏敏感性增加和反应抑制减弱。在这项初步研究中,我们使用特定疾病的刺激直接比较这两种疾病在冲动性方面的情况,以深入了解这两种疾病及其潜在机制之间的关系。我们比较了23名患有BED的女性(年龄 = 40.9岁)、21名患有AUD的参与者(13名女性,8名男性,年龄 = 46.6岁)以及年龄和性别匹配的对照组(分别为BED-CG和AUD-CG)的眼动情况。我们使用自由探索范式测量奖赏敏感性,使用改良的反扫视范式测量反应抑制。我们呈现特定疾病的刺激与中性刺激,即在BED和BED-CG组中呈现食物刺激,在AUD和AUD-CG组中呈现酒精刺激。与中性刺激相比,BED和BED-CG最初更频繁地注视食物刺激,而与酒精刺激相比,AUD和AUD-CG最初更频繁地注视中性刺激。与其他组相比,AUD在两种刺激类别上的注视时间都更短。当应抑制对刺激的扫视时,与AUD-CG相比,BED在两种刺激类别的首次扫视中出现更多错误,与所有其他组相比,在第二次扫视中尤其在对食物刺激时出现更多错误,而AUD与对照组没有差异。这项初步研究表明,食物和酒精刺激在第一眼看来的处理方式不同。此外,患有BED和AUD的患者似乎对特定疾病的刺激处理方式不同。患有AUD的患者通常会避开刺激,而患有BED的患者主要表现出抑制控制方面的缺陷。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8af4/6813717/0483dfe04876/fpsyt-10-00724-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验