Suppr超能文献

在一项随机对照试验中,通过纵向实验室任务评估的与食物相关的冲动性在暴食症患者中降低。

Food-related impulsivity assessed by longitudinal laboratory tasks is reduced in patients with binge eating disorder in a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical University Hospital Tübingen, Osianderstraße 5, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.

Competence Center for Eating Disorders Tübingen (KOMET), Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 15;11(1):8225. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87231-w.

Abstract

Food-related impulsivity, i.e. a food-related attentional bias proposed to be due to increased reward sensitivity and diminished inhibitory control, has been cross-sectionally associated with binge eating disorder. To analyze changes in food-related impulsivity, we implemented longitudinal analyses of objective laboratory tasks in a randomized controlled trial called IMPULS. Patients who attended an impulsivity-focused group intervention (IG N = 31) and control patients who did not take part in the intervention (CG N = 25) were compared before (T0) and after the intervention period (T1) and at three months follow-up (T2). Patients' impulsive gaze behavior towards food vs. neutral stimuli was measured in two eye tracking paradigms, one addressing reward sensitivity and another addressing inhibitory control. Initial fixations of food vs. neutral stimuli were increased at T0 (IG: p = .014, CG: p = .001), but not at T1 and T2 in IG (T1: p = .178, T2: p = .203) and in CG after Bonferroni correction only at T2 (T1: p = .031, T2: p = .002). Patients from IG increased dwell time on neutral stimuli at T1 contrary to patients from CG (p = .016) and rated the presented food stimuli as less positive (e.g. pleasantness p < .001 at T1 and T2). A possible explanation for this observation is reduced reward sensitivity, which implies a short-term treatment effect. Both groups showed improvement in inhibiting eye movements towards food and neutral stimuli over time (i.e. first saccade errors overall p < .001, second saccade errors overall p < .003). This could indicate increased inhibitory control due to training effects from the study paradigm. The results suggest that food-related impulsivity represents an underlying mechanism of BED and that it is modifiable by cognitive behavioral interventions.

摘要

食物相关冲动性,即一种与食物相关的注意力偏向,据推测是由于奖赏敏感性增加和抑制控制减弱所致,与暴食障碍存在横断面关联。为了分析食物相关冲动性的变化,我们在一项名为 IMPULS 的随机对照试验中实施了客观实验室任务的纵向分析。参加冲动性聚焦团体干预的患者(IG,N=31)和未参加干预的对照组患者(CG,N=25)在干预前(T0)、干预后(T1)和三个月随访(T2)时进行了比较。在两个眼动追踪范式中测量了患者对食物与中性刺激的冲动性注视行为,一个范式用于测量奖赏敏感性,另一个范式用于测量抑制控制。IG 组在 T0 时对食物与中性刺激的初始注视增加(IG:p=0.014,CG:p=0.001),但在 T1 和 T2 时未增加(T1:p=0.178,T2:p=0.203),在 CG 组仅在经过 Bonferroni 校正后在 T2 时增加(T1:p=0.031,T2:p=0.002)。与 CG 组相反,IG 组的患者在 T1 时增加了对中性刺激的停留时间(p=0.016),并对呈现的食物刺激评价为不那么积极(例如愉悦感 p<0.001,T1 和 T2 时)。这种观察结果的一个可能解释是奖赏敏感性降低,这意味着短期治疗效果。两组患者在抑制对食物和中性刺激的眼动方面都随着时间的推移而得到改善(即总体第一扫视错误 p<0.001,总体第二扫视错误 p<0.003)。这可能表明由于研究范式的训练效应,抑制控制得到了增强。结果表明,食物相关冲动性是 BED 的一个潜在机制,可以通过认知行为干预进行调节。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c1a/8050257/52ed13edb02d/41598_2021_87231_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验