• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

构建在线育儿技能与青少年药物预防项目的形成性评估:混合方法研究

Formative Evaluation to Build an Online Parenting Skills and Youth Drug Prevention Program: Mixed Methods Study.

作者信息

Scheier Lawrence Matthew, Kumpfer Karol L, Brown Jaynie Litster, Hu QingQing

机构信息

LARS Research Institute, Scottsdale, AZ, United States.

University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2019 Nov 5;3(4):e14906. doi: 10.2196/14906.

DOI:10.2196/14906
PMID:31687934
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6914279/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Family-based drug prevention programs that use group-based formats with trained facilitators, such as the Strengthening Families Program (SFP), are effective in preventing underage drinking and youth drug use. However, these programs are resource-intensive and have high costs and logistical demands. Tailoring them for Web-based delivery is more cost-effective and makes it easier to scale these programs for widespread dissemination. This requires the active involvement of all key stakeholders to determine content and delivery format.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to obtain consumer, agency stakeholder, and expert input into the design of a Web-based parenting skills training and youth drug prevention program.

METHODS

We conducted 10 focus groups with 85 adults (range 4-10, average 8 per group), 20 stakeholder interviews with family services agency staff, and discussed critical design considerations with 10 prevention scientists and e-learning experts to determine the optimal program content and technology features for SFP Online. Focus group participants also answered survey questions on perceived barriers to use, desired navigational features, preferred course format, desired content, preferred reward structures, course length, interactive components, computer efficacy, and technology use. Descriptive statistics were used to examine consumer characteristics; linear regression was used to examine relations between SFP exposure and four continuous outcome measures, including desired program content, interactive technology, and concerns that may inhibit future use of SFP Online. Logistic regression was used as a binary measure of whether consumers desired fun games in the SFP Online program.

RESULTS

Three broad thematic categories emerged from the qualitative interviews enumerating the importance of (1) lesson content, (2) logistics for program delivery, and (3) multimedia interactivity. Among the many significant relations, parents who viewed more SFP lessons reported more reasons to use an online program (beta=1.48, P=.03) and also wanted more interactivity (6 lessons: beta=3.72, P=.01; >6 lessons: beta=2.39, P=.01), parents with less interest in a mixed delivery format (class and online) reported fewer reasons to use the online program (beta=-3.93, P=.01), comfort using computers was negatively associated with concerns about the program (beta=-1.83, P=.01), having mobile phone access was related to fewer concerns about online programs (beta=-1.63, P=.02), willingness to view an online program using a mobile phone was positively associated with wanting more online components (beta=1.95, P=.02), and parents who wanted fun games wanted more interactivity (beta=2.28, P=.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Formative evaluation based on user-centered approaches can provide rich information that fuels development of an online program. The user-centered strategies in this study lay the foundation for improving SFP Online and provide a means to accommodate user interests and ensure the product serves as an effective prevention tool that is attractive to consumers, engaging, and can overcome some of the barriers to recruitment and retention that have previously affected program outcomes in family-based prevention.

摘要

背景

以家庭为基础的药物预防项目,如强化家庭项目(SFP),采用有训练有素的主持人的小组形式,在预防未成年人饮酒和青少年药物使用方面是有效的。然而,这些项目资源密集,成本高且后勤需求大。将其调整为基于网络的交付方式更具成本效益,并且更容易扩大这些项目以进行广泛传播。这需要所有关键利益相关者的积极参与来确定内容和交付形式。

目的

目的是获得消费者、机构利益相关者和专家对基于网络的育儿技能培训和青少年药物预防项目设计的意见。

方法

我们与85名成年人进行了10个焦点小组讨论(每组4 - 10人,平均每组8人),与家庭服务机构工作人员进行了20次利益相关者访谈,并与10名预防科学家和电子学习专家讨论了关键设计考虑因素,以确定SFP在线的最佳项目内容和技术特征。焦点小组参与者还回答了关于使用障碍、期望的导航功能、首选课程形式、期望内容、首选奖励结构、课程长度、互动组件、计算机效能和技术使用的调查问题。使用描述性统计来检查消费者特征;使用线性回归来检查SFP接触与四个连续结果指标之间的关系,包括期望的项目内容、互动技术以及可能抑制未来使用SFP在线的担忧。逻辑回归用作消费者是否期望在SFP在线项目中有有趣游戏的二元指标。

结果

定性访谈中出现了三个广泛的主题类别,列举了(1)课程内容、(2)项目交付后勤和(3)多媒体互动的重要性。在众多显著关系中,观看更多SFP课程的家长报告使用在线项目的理由更多(β = 1.48,P = 0.03),并且也希望有更多互动(6节课程:β = 3.72,P = 0.01;>6节课程:β = 2.39,P = 0.01),对混合交付形式(课堂和在线)兴趣较低的家长报告使用在线项目的理由较少(β = -3.93,P = 0.01),使用计算机的舒适度与对项目的担忧呈负相关(β = -1.83,P = 0.01),能够使用手机与对在线项目的担忧较少相关(β = -1.63,P = 0.02),愿意使用手机观看在线项目与希望有更多在线组件呈正相关(β = 1.95,P = 0.02),并且希望有有趣游戏的家长希望有更多互动(β = 2.28,P = 0.01)。

结论

基于以用户为中心的方法进行的形成性评估可以提供丰富的信息,为在线项目的开发提供动力。本研究中以用户为中心的策略为改进SFP在线奠定了基础,并提供了一种方式来适应用户兴趣,确保该产品成为一种有效的预防工具,对消费者有吸引力、引人入胜,并且可以克服一些以前影响基于家庭的预防项目结果的招募和留存障碍。

相似文献

1
Formative Evaluation to Build an Online Parenting Skills and Youth Drug Prevention Program: Mixed Methods Study.构建在线育儿技能与青少年药物预防项目的形成性评估:混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2019 Nov 5;3(4):e14906. doi: 10.2196/14906.
2
A Parenting Behavior Intervention (the Strengthening Families Program) for Families: Noninferiority Trial of Different Program Delivery Methods.一项针对家庭的养育行为干预措施(强化家庭计划):不同项目实施方式的非劣效性试验
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2019 Nov 18;2(2):e14751. doi: 10.2196/14751.
3
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
4
Designing a Mobile App to Enhance Parenting Skills of Latinx Parents: A Community-Based Participatory Approach.设计一款移动应用程序以提升拉丁裔父母的育儿技能:一种基于社区参与的方法。
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Jan 24;4(1):e12618. doi: 10.2196/12618.
5
Designing a physical activity parenting course: parental views on recruitment, content and delivery.设计一个体育活动养育课程:家长对招募、内容和交付的看法。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jul 5;12:356. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-356.
6
Socioeconomic factors and parents' preferences for internet- and mobile-based parenting interventions to prevent youth mental health problems: A discrete choice experiment.社会经济因素以及父母对基于互联网和移动设备的育儿干预措施预防青少年心理健康问题的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Internet Interv. 2022 Mar 8;28:100522. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100522. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
Identifying the Information Needs and Format Preferences for Web-Based Content Among Adults With or Parents of Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Three-Stage Qualitative Analysis.确定患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍的成年人或其子女的父母对基于网络内容的信息需求和格式偏好:三阶段定性分析
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Sep 11;7:e47409. doi: 10.2196/47409.
8
If You Build It, Will They Come? Patterns of Internet-Based and Face-To-Face Participation in a Parenting Program for Military Families.如果你建造了它,他们会来吗?军属育儿项目中基于互联网和面对面参与的模式。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jun 22;18(6):e169. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4445.
9
A Web-Based Psychoeducational Intervention for Adolescent Depression: Design and Development of MoodHwb.一种基于网络的青少年抑郁症心理教育干预:MoodHwb的设计与开发。
JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Feb 15;5(1):e13. doi: 10.2196/mental.8894.
10
Features That Middle-aged and Older Cancer Survivors Want in Web-Based Healthy Lifestyle Interventions: Qualitative Descriptive Study.中年及老年癌症幸存者对基于网络的健康生活方式干预措施的期望:定性描述性研究。
JMIR Cancer. 2021 Oct 6;7(4):e26226. doi: 10.2196/26226.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating facilitators and barriers of university-based administrative staff, residents and researchers to implement an active breaks intervention: a mixed-methods study.调查大学行政人员、住院医师和研究人员实施主动休息干预措施的促进因素和障碍:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 5;15(9):e093781. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093781.
2
Workplace active breaks for university workers: the UNIFIT pilot study protocol.大学教职工的工作场所主动休息:UNIFIT试点研究方案。
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2024 Sep 5;10(3):e002184. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002184. eCollection 2024.
3
Investigating Facilitators and Barriers for Active Breaks among Secondary School Students: Formative Evaluation of Teachers and Students.调查中学生主动休息的促进因素和障碍:教师与学生的形成性评价
Children (Basel). 2024 Jan 25;11(2):155. doi: 10.3390/children11020155.

本文引用的文献

1
Rationale and design for eHealth Familias Unidas Primary Care: A drug use, sexual risk behavior, and STI preventive intervention for hispanic youth in pediatric primary care clinics.电子健康家庭联合初级保健计划的基本原理和设计:在儿科初级保健诊所为西班牙裔青年提供药物使用、性风险行为和性传播感染预防干预。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Jan;76:64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Nov 17.
2
Addressing Barriers to Recruitment and Retention in the Implementation of Parenting Programs: Lessons Learned for Effective Program Delivery in Rural and Urban Areas.解决育儿项目实施过程中的招募与留用障碍:城乡地区有效项目交付的经验教训。
J Child Fam Stud. 2018 Sep;27(9):2925-2942. doi: 10.1007/s10826-018-1139-8. Epub 2018 Jun 16.
3
Children with Elevated Psychosocial Risk Load Benefit Most from a Family-Based Preventive Intervention: Exploratory Differential Analyses from the German "Strengthening Families Program 10-14" Adaptation Trial.具有较高心理社会风险负担的儿童从基于家庭的预防干预中获益最多:德国“强化家庭计划 10-14”适应试验的探索性差异分析。
Prev Sci. 2017 Nov;18(8):932-942. doi: 10.1007/s11121-017-0797-x.
4
eHealth Familias Unidas: Pilot Study of an Internet Adaptation of an Evidence-Based Family Intervention to Reduce Drug Use and Sexual Risk Behaviors Among Hispanic Adolescents.电子健康家庭联盟:一项基于证据的家庭干预措施的网络改编版的试点研究,旨在减少西班牙裔青少年的药物使用和性风险行为。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Mar 4;14(3):264. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14030264.
5
Cultural Adaptation and Implementation of Family Evidence-Based Interventions with Diverse Populations.针对不同人群的家庭循证干预措施的文化调适与实施
Prev Sci. 2017 Aug;18(6):649-659. doi: 10.1007/s11121-016-0719-3.
6
Effective Parenting Interventions to Reduce Youth Substance Use: A Systematic Review.减少青少年药物使用的有效育儿干预措施:一项系统综述
Pediatrics. 2016 Aug;138(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-4425.
7
Participatory Research as One Piece of the Puzzle: A Systematic Review of Consumer Involvement in Design of Technology-Based Youth Mental Health and Well-Being Interventions.参与式研究作为拼图的一部分:关于消费者参与基于技术的青少年心理健康与幸福干预措施设计的系统综述
JMIR Hum Factors. 2015 Jul 9;2(2):e12. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.4361.
8
Digital delivery methods of parenting training interventions: a systematic review.育儿培训干预措施的数字交付方法:一项系统综述
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2014 Jun;11(3):168-76. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12040. Epub 2014 May 19.
9
Surviving or thriving: quality assurance mechanisms to promote innovation in the development of evidence-based parenting interventions.生存还是繁荣:促进循证育儿干预措施发展创新的质量保证机制
Prev Sci. 2015 Apr;16(3):421-31. doi: 10.1007/s11121-014-0475-1.
10
Looking Forward: The Promise of Widespread Implementation of Parent Training Programs.展望未来:广泛实施家长培训计划的前景。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Nov;8(6):682-94. doi: 10.1177/1745691613503478.