Suppr超能文献

一项针对家庭的养育行为干预措施(强化家庭计划):不同项目实施方式的非劣效性试验

A Parenting Behavior Intervention (the Strengthening Families Program) for Families: Noninferiority Trial of Different Program Delivery Methods.

作者信息

Kumpfer Karol Linda, Brown Jaynie Litster

机构信息

Health Sciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.

Strengthening Families Program LLC, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2019 Nov 18;2(2):e14751. doi: 10.2196/14751.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Strengthening Families Program (SFP) is an evidence-based parent training and youth life skills and drug prevention program traditionally delivered in group settings. Families attend parent and youth classes conducted by trained facilitators. Recently, a 2-disk home-use DVD series was created with the same SFP skills as the group classes for parents and the youth to watch together at home. Additional lesson material was added that included healthy brain development, school success, anger management, dangers of alcohol and drugs, and mindfulness. The SFP DVD reduces SFP delivery costs for agencies and logistic burdens to families. Creative applications of the DVD include holding SFP DVD family discussion groups of multiple families and using SFP DVD video clips as part of a shorter 10-week group class version for parents and the youth.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine three different DVD implementation scenarios using a noninferiority trial, contrasting target outcomes with an age-matched sample culled from a national norm database of families who completed a standard SFP 14-week class.

METHODS

The partial eta-square was used to compare effect sizes between the different delivery modalities for relevant programmatic outcomes. We adjusted the effect sizes by demographic measures to determine whether there were site-specific features influencing program outcomes.

RESULTS

For the unadjusted effect size comparisons, 13 of the 15 indicated that the home-use DVD outperformed group norms with an average 0.13 effect size estimate difference across the comparisons (28% improvement in the effect size for DVD condition). Comparisons of the home-use DVD condition with the mixed DVD use conditions showed no discernable pattern where one condition consistently outperformed another. Adjusted effect sizes still reinforced the superiority of the DVD conditions; however, there was some shrinkage in the effect sizes as expected with the inclusion of relevant covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

The home-use DVD shows that it is possible to effectively deliver an affordable family-based intervention using alternative technology outside of the traditional group-based class format. In almost all of the comparisons, the DVD conditions outperformed the group norms, underscoring that low-cost DVDs or viewing the videos on the Web may provide a useful surrogate for costly group-based formats. Future studies may want to improve on the quasi-experimental design by examining programmatic differences based on delivery format using a randomized controlled trial, thus strengthening the causal framework regarding program effects. In addition, the assessment protocol relied on retrospective reporting, which, although this can limit response shift bias, does not separate data collection in time as with a true pre- and posttest design.

摘要

背景

强化家庭计划(SFP)是一项基于证据的家长培训以及青少年生活技能与药物预防计划,传统上是在团体环境中开展。家庭参加由训练有素的主持人主持的家长和青少年课程。最近,制作了一套包含2张光盘的家庭使用DVD系列,其内容与团体课程中的SFP技能相同,供家长和青少年在家一起观看。此外,还增加了包括健康大脑发育、学业成功、愤怒管理、酒精和药物危害以及正念等内容的课程材料。SFP DVD降低了机构的SFP实施成本以及家庭的后勤负担。DVD的创新性应用包括举办多个家庭参与的SFP DVD家庭讨论小组,以及将SFP DVD视频片段用作针对家长和青少年的为期10周的较短团体课程版本的一部分。

目的

本研究旨在使用非劣效性试验来检验三种不同的DVD实施方案,将目标结果与从完成标准SFP 14周课程的家庭全国常模数据库中挑选出的年龄匹配样本进行对比。

方法

使用偏 eta 方来比较不同实施方式在相关计划结果方面的效应大小。我们通过人口统计学指标对效应大小进行调整,以确定是否存在影响计划结果的特定场所特征。

结果

对于未调整的效应大小比较,15项中有13项表明家庭使用的DVD优于团体常模,各比较的平均效应大小估计差异为0.13(DVD条件下效应大小提高了28%)。家庭使用DVD条件与混合使用DVD条件的比较未显示出一种条件始终优于另一种条件的明显模式。调整后的效应大小仍然强化了DVD条件的优越性;然而,正如预期的那样,随着纳入相关协变量,效应大小有所缩小。

结论

家庭使用的DVD表明,在传统的基于团体课程的形式之外,利用替代技术有效地提供经济实惠的家庭干预是可行的。在几乎所有比较中,DVD条件都优于团体常模,这突出表明低成本的DVD或在网络上观看视频可能为成本高昂的基于团体的形式提供有用的替代方案。未来的研究可能希望通过使用随机对照试验来检验基于实施形式的计划差异,从而改进准实验设计,进而加强关于计划效果的因果框架。此外,评估方案依赖于回顾性报告,虽然这可以限制反应转移偏差,但不像真正的前后测试设计那样在时间上分开数据收集。

相似文献

8

本文引用的文献

10
Evaluation of a Swedish version of the Strengthening Families Programme.瑞典版家庭强化项目评估
Eur J Public Health. 2014 Aug;24(4):578-84. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt146. Epub 2013 Sep 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验