Moon Sarah E, Van Dam Pieter J, Kitsos Alex
Australian Institute of Health Service Management, University of Tasmania, Hobart TAS 7005, Australia.
School of Medicine, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart TAS 7005, Australia.
Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Nov 4;7(4):132. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7040132.
Transformational leadership (TL) is known to be essential to achieving Magnet recognition, an internationally prestigious status for nursing care excellence. Since its inception in the 1980s, empirical studies have identified benefits of implementing the Magnet Model involving improved patient care and nursing workforce outcomes. However, little is known about the leadership styles of nurse managers (NMs) working in a regional Australian context, which may hinder achieving Magnet status. To close the knowledge gap, a self-administered survey was conducted to measure leadership styles of NMs at a large health organization comprising hospitals with a wide range of service profiles in regional Australia using a validated tool-the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ-6S). One-way of variance (ANOVA) was used to identify statistical significance between respondents' demographic characteristics (e.g., age, education, gender) and their MLQ-6S scores. Respondents ( = 78) reported their leadership styles as more transformational, compared to transactional or passive/avoidant leadership styles. The findings indicated that NMs' higher education ( = 0.02) and older age ( = 0.03) were associated with TL styles, whereas passive/avoidant leadership was generally reported by female ( = 0.04) and younger ( = 0.06) respondents. This study has identified differences in reported leadership styles among NMs, providing a unique organizational insight into developing strategies to improve NMs' TL, which could help to facilitate the implementation of the Magnet framework. Healthcare organizations in similar settings could benefit from replicating this study to identify a dominant leadership style and customize strategies to improve TL.
变革型领导(TL)被认为是获得磁石奖认可的关键,磁石奖是国际上享有盛誉的卓越护理地位。自20世纪80年代设立以来,实证研究已经确定了实施磁石模式的益处,包括改善患者护理和护理人员工作成果。然而,对于在澳大利亚地区工作的护士长(NMs)的领导风格知之甚少,这可能会阻碍获得磁石奖地位。为了填补这一知识空白,我们进行了一项自我管理的调查,使用经过验证的工具——多因素领导问卷(MLQ-6S),来衡量澳大利亚地区一家大型健康组织中护士长的领导风格,该组织包括具有广泛服务类型的医院。单因素方差分析(ANOVA)用于确定受访者的人口统计学特征(如年龄、教育程度、性别)与其MLQ-6S得分之间的统计学显著性。与交易型或被动/回避型领导风格相比,78名受访者报告他们的领导风格更倾向于变革型。研究结果表明,护士长的高等教育程度(p = 0.02)和年长(p = 0.03)与变革型领导风格相关,而女性(p = 0.04)和年轻受访者(p = 0.06)通常报告采用被动/回避型领导风格。本研究确定了护士长报告的领导风格存在差异,为制定改善护士长变革型领导的策略提供了独特的组织见解,这有助于促进磁石框架的实施。类似环境中的医疗保健组织可以通过重复这项研究来确定主导领导风格并定制改善变革型领导的策略而受益。