Heberer J, Eicher M
Dr. jur. Jörg Heberer & Kollegen, Rechtsanwaltskanzlei, Paul-Hösch-Str. 25a, 81243, München, Deutschland.
Unfallchirurg. 2020 Jan;123(1):6-15. doi: 10.1007/s00113-019-00736-y.
The number of treatment error procedures against physicians in Germany has been relatively constant at a high level for years, even though the allegation of a faulty medical procedure is confirmed statistically only in approximately one quarter of the cases.
Frequent and typical sources of error that can lead to the assertion of patient claims in the context of a medical treatment.
Evaluation of existing statistics of individual courts and arbitration boards.
From a legal point of view the most common mistakes under the medical liability law can be divided into seven categories, which are the subject of dispute in almost all judicial or extrajudicial treatment error procedures. Due to the civil legal evidence situation thereby errors in disclosure of information take the top spot.
Even by observing a few legal requirements, numerous liability traps can be avoided in the context of medical treatment.
多年来,德国针对医生的医疗失误诉讼数量一直居高不下且相对稳定,尽管从统计学角度来看,只有约四分之一的案件中医疗程序失误的指控得到证实。
找出在医疗过程中可能导致患者提出索赔的常见且典型的失误源头。
对各法院和仲裁委员会的现有统计数据进行评估。
从法律角度来看,医疗责任法规定下最常见的失误可分为七类,几乎在所有司法或非司法医疗失误程序中都是争议焦点。由于民事法律证据情况,信息披露失误位居榜首。
即使遵循一些法律要求,在医疗过程中也可避免众多责任陷阱。